DEVS

Best show I've seen in a long while. If you're like the 4 billion other people quarantined with plenty of time on your hands, I highly recommend giving this one a watch.

Attached: devs-review-sci-fi-series.jpg (810x456, 28.54K)

Come on, boy, work for it. Really sell me on it. What is it about? What makes it good? What makes it stand out compared to other shows?

What was Kenton thinking?

All right, all right. It's loosely (in my own layman terms) about a fictional tech company building a powerful computer strong enough to map out everything. Literally everything. Thematically it's about determinism and whether or not free will exists. It's Alex Garland's project and he had full reign of this one, so similar to Ex Machina and Annhilation, although having full control of this project it has everything great about Anihilation without all the dumb shit that was forced in. Great cinematography style, incredible use of soundtrack, great acting, cool subject matter

You have succeeded in piquing my interest. It sounds like what Westworld wants to do but less bloated and cringe. I will give it a try.

Soulless midwit shit meant to "blow your mind" but is actually predictable and lame.

Absolutely. This is like Westworld but aimed at the kind of people who are actually interested in these themes topics as opposed to being aimed at GoT normies. None of the fat, none of the BS, just a tightly crafted sci-fi show

whats a good show then

Dark

Attached: MV5BMmIyZjA3NGUtYjlhNS00ZDlkLWI0MDgtMDc2YWNjNGMwYWZhXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMzY0MTE3NzU@._V1_.jpg (1382x2048, 1.48M)

I was waiting this show but I wait for the whole season to be released because it looks like one of those shows with the big mystery and cliffhangers in the end of the episodes

they should have balls and shown how some families there really were.
lack the courage or did you not have the" permission " to show?

Attached: devs.jpg (1920x1080, 85.48K)

in English, doc

I'm enjoying it so far. The skinny asian chick is painful to look at though with a face that has a look of confusion at all times. She looks like a human stick figure that they tried to make look like a butch dyke. She also has this strange way she walks like an old chinese woman sort of leaning back and swinging the legs in a sauntering way...its just odd and it bothers me that i notice it. The Rich company owner guy is good and the short asian boyfriend is good but he plays a doormat. They need to move it along though. Enough of the asian chicks story and her drama. I'd actually rather even watch the Rich guy and the moonface chick drama instead.

>they should have balls and shown how some families there really were.
>lack the courage or did you not have the" permission " to show?

Attached: 300px-Mike_Wazowski-Sulley_Face_Swap.jpg (300x272, 10.69K)

the twist will be they were in the computer the entire time. quote me on it

simulation hypothesis: the show

no shit sherlock

Whoa holy shit give this guy the Nobel Peace Prize

He wasn't. His ego was.
Lily is spot on as a female coder stereotype. Scrawny and spergy. Jamie is a shameless simp. But it beats being an azncel.

and the reason the computer can't predict past 12am is because that's when they shut off the computer in base reality

retarded

yes

Attached: mpv-shot0001.jpg (1920x1080, 264.22K)

WHERE IS YOUR "GOD" NOW?

Attached: devs-alex-garland-scaled.jpg (2560x1824, 757.17K)

Without fail, there's always a pretentious twat that wants to dismiss something obviously good to prove that they're intellectually superior. Fake and gay. Devs is a masterpiece.

g u e s s

That's not a twist.

I wonder if he went back and watched Marilyn Monroe getting fucked in HD.

I actually predicted it from the very first episode, but I have no way of proving that I did. so just take my word for it

It's the basic idea of the show, not a prediction.

so what who fucking cares you are anonymous

garland must have read "the last question" and "The Dead Past" by asimov

Attached: mpv-shot0002.jpg (1920x1080, 264.64K)

I think this might be one of the greatest pleb bait ever considering how many people call it genius when it's full-on disappointing garbage

If you assume the laws of reality are as simple as they can be, to me I can't think of anything simpler than n+1. But something as simple as that contains infinity, the simple act of adding 1 forever will get you every conceivable reality. 0+1+1+1+1, forever. If you can compute every number, somewhere within those numbers will be a string of 1s and 0s that represent this Yas Forums thread, this reality, this world.
I'm pretty fucking drunk so I hope what just I said makes sense

Fuck this shit

Dude are you high

At this point its more like adding either 1 or 0 for infinity, every possible permutation.

my point is if numbers are real then everyhthing is real, if every number exists then everything you can imagine exists, every state of reality can be represented by a number

>my point is if numbers are real then everyhthing is real

Attached: how-can-mirrors-be-real--if-our-eyes-arent-real[1].jpg (1280x720, 474.74K)

broh....

explain 'real'

real as in it's not just it's not just an theoretical construct we invented, it actually exists somewhere in some form

if every number actually exists, then that means every possibly reality exists. somewhere among infinity will be a string of 0s and 1s that can represent any state of reality you can think of. like a literal library of babel

giant little girl upskirt pictures when?

>If teeth exist, then the tooth fairy must be exist!

That's how you sound.

gotta watch the show for that

you don't understand the nature of infinity. if every number exists then everything exists. just think about it for a fucking second and you'll realize I'm right. everything can be represented by numbers. zeroes and ones to describe text, to describe the placement of atoms. if n+1 for infinity is the only law of reality, you will compute every conceivable reality

I'm up to date on Devs and and I'm not 100% convinced by it. It's going to have to stick the landing for me to recommend it to anyone.

Explaining the series to this level of detail is cheating people out of the first two episodes. Without that experience I really doubt they'll want to go through the next few.

One more episode bros

pretentious hipster bullshit

Attached: devs.png (1920x1080, 1.5M)

i told my dad it's about a computer that can predict the future

i've been enjoying it. the first fe eps were very intriguing, and i'm enjoying it overall. poor qt boy(girl) is gonna get it soon :(

he(she) already fell off a dam to her(his) death

or it's because the writer wrote a movie with girls in it, but us counter-culture anons can't enjoy that because girls are icky! also the lead is an asian woman, literal white genocide feminist propaganda!
no i'm not being serious, the show is garlandkino, so is annihilation, so is 28 days later, so is ex machina, so is dredd, etc

>Explaining the series to this level of detail is cheating people out of the first two episodes. Without that experience I really doubt they'll want to go through the next few.
I disagree. I get what you're saying but the first episode will still peel your wig off even with the information provided above.

so is deez nutz

perhaps Garland is /ourguy/?

he surely is up there

annihilation was great
I'd say garland is pretty fuckin based

I need to start reading seriously. I'm 31 though, I feel like I'll never "catch up".

You're just a pretentious wanker mate.

this that deep shit is why i'm here, inb4 another pseudo-intellectual incel says it's "for plebs"

You misspelled best show on television.

>the show is garlandkino

AGREED

that was just my drunken rantings, it has nothing really to do with the show
I'm obsessed with thesimulation hypothesis and I have a lot strange ideas about it