/film/

Thread for the intellectual discussion of arthouse and classic cinema.

Attached: au0p7w5m8x021.jpg (780x449, 9.69K)

Other urls found in this thread:

letterboxd.com/yellowromeda/list/tv-s-guide-to-entry-level-art-house/
drive.google.com/file/d/1uZHpOLoRR39O283FFhejxXtKpIkc54ZR/view
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Aнoн, ты зaкoнчил мoю фильмoгpaфию, нe тaк ли?

Attached: tumblr_oiyvbkUa1R1sym5yvo1_500.jpg (493x612, 62.76K)

Cнид

Why is Rivette so underrated compared to other FNW directors? (especially considering that he was the best one)
Da, Andrei

Attached: 2XK2WQGGZYI6LG2LNHSUVITZ34.jpg (1440x2043, 412.58K)

Why is it that this thread always advertises itself as intellectual, yet I've never seen any intellectual discussion in these threads.
>this is underrated
>this is overrated
>watch this, 10/10
>wow, cool surrealism, slow, so thoughtful
>wow this movie really makes you think
Always the same shit...

Give me some starter arthouse

This please

your to dumb

bergman, tarkovsky the list could go on

You don't find the Godard discussions, Dreyer theatrical and Bay praising posts to be highly intellectual?
Also people like you are the worst people
>i will just complain and never contribute myself that will be great
Kys, you fucking retard.

because your mother fucks niggers with her anus

letterboxd.com/yellowromeda/list/tv-s-guide-to-entry-level-art-house/
L'Eclisse and Marienbad are not entry level imo. I would replace them with La Notte and Hiroshima Mon Amour. Bergman is a good start since he makes short good films.

But there are no niggers in my city and barely any in my country. Highly improbable.

I'm in love bros...

Attached: file.png (1200x911, 2.19M)

they are all hidden under your mommy's bed
you are most probably a stinky mutt yourself

She doesn't have a bed though. Seems like you are projecting and you are a mutt yourself.

what do you guys think of Yi'nan Diao?

Attached: wild.goose.lake.SHOES.webm (1024x540, 2.79M)

why did he do it?

Attached: 1569700705432.png (777x437, 148.99K)

Wong Kar Wai and In the Mood for Love. It perfectly captures my mood right now.

He preferred fucking the witch to his stupid fucking family. Who can blame him?

>/film/
>Thread for the intellectual discussion of arthouse and classic cinema.

Attached: 20180511thanusxxsupersoyan_shadbase_soy.jpg (1000x1243, 835.89K)

Yadda yadda yadda, who is the best contemporary American director? Pic not updated

So far we have
>PTA
>Baker
>Baumbach
>Barney
>Bay
>Bonnetta
>Carruth
>Clark
>Decker
>Eggers
>Granik
>Haynes
>Jarmusch
>Kaufman
>Kogonada
>Korine
>Lockhart
>Loktev
>Lowery
>Malick
>Reichardt
>Safdies
>Silva
>Stratman
>Sutton
>Swanberg
>Todd
>Yogi
>Zahler
>Zhao

Been told to remove
>PTA
>Baker
>Barney
>Baumbach
>Bay
>Carruth
>Eggers
>Jarmusch
>Lowery
>Malick
>Safdies
>Swanberg
>Zhao

Possibly adding
>Aster
>Benning
>Chazelle
>Chung
>Coppola
>Fincher
>Garland
>Jost
>Polish Bros
>Riley
>Saulnier
>Taymor
>Wang
>Wiseman

Not adding so stop asking
>Wes Anderson
>Soderbergh
>Snyder
>Tarantino

Attached: films_Recommended_Contemporary_American_Directors_v3.png (1026x2060, 1.56M)

Also, if anyone has any suggestions for what film I should put for each director, I'm all ears. Right now I'm just using their most popular film

>PTA
Keep
>Baker
Keep
>Barney
Can remove
>Baumbach
Can remove
>Bay
Keep
>Carruth
Keep
>Eggers
Keep
>Jarmusch
Keep
>Lowery
Keep
>Malick
Keep
>Safdies
Keep
>Swanberg
Can remove
>Zhao
Can remove

This being said, this board will never reach any sort of conclusion so you can just keep it as it is.

I like The Wild Goose Lake. Kind of reminds me of Seijun Suzuki for the noir color work, though the context is different

You can only know God if you renounce the flesh, or sacrifice your material ties and possessions

Fuck off nigger, stop bothering us, your mama is the best American contemporary director, now stfu

Post films that are good but overrated by normies, such as picrel

Attached: ZMwlUFL3CDDMgsvBiMLhyDcWcdSAli_large.jpg (1288x1600, 330.29K)

>This being said, this board will never reach any sort of conclusion so you can just keep it as it is.
Yeah, I'll probably just make one more edit, then I'm done
Just trying to start some sort of different discussion so we're not just talking about the same stuff over and over.

He was a real jerk.

great tits

What do you mean?

...

which Pawlikowski films are worth watching? have seen Ida and will be watching Cold War tonight

Attached: Ida.jpg (1200x686, 303.29K)

any of you anons has a link to watch Days by Tsai ming liang? On youtube it says it's a private video

Another general where the OP has nothing useful to share. Not even a pastebin.

drive.google.com/file/d/1uZHpOLoRR39O283FFhejxXtKpIkc54ZR/view

name one good foreign film that isn't on the Criterion Collection

Cringe. They don't even have Béla Tarr yet

thank you

He kicked Rohmer out of Cahiers because Rohmer thought the magazine should stick to film criticism rather than politics. A real jerk move.

Why would Godard discussions be intellectual when the man himself isn't?

Rohmer refused to refocus the magazine. They wanted to write more about contemporary and non Hollywood films. Rivette was supported in this shift by others like Godard etc. Rohmer even acted in Out 1 years after this so they seemed to be friendly.

What did my soviet film mean by this?
Movie was a mess at first but got sad at the end so it was ok i guess

Attached: Sredi serykh kamney (Kira Muratova, 1983).avi_snapshot_01.22.59_[2020.04.09_16.15.28].png (700x1151, 702.98K)

Angelopoulos, most of Vlacil, Tarr

What is he then?

An autistic pseud, just like the majority of Yas Forums.

>uses the term "foreign film"
Go back

based

Name 3 (THREE) directors.

Le Passion de Jeanne D’Arc Variety review (December 31, 1927 11:00pm PT)

Here is a deadly tiresome picture that merely makes an attempt to narrate without sound or dialog an allegedly written recorded trial in the 15th or 16th century of Joan of Arc for witchery, leading to her condemnation and burning at the stake.

One grows terribly weary of seeing her judges reappear, of the long series of captioned questions and answers, of Joan double-crossed, and of Joan doing a long-distance burning sequence, with the French mobs as inserts. Totally a cheaply economic film as a product.

There is some photographic value through the continuous allure of whole-screen closeups of faces only, mostly of the hard-visaged elderly men in cloistered costumes. They look like stone images brought to life.

In appearance, Joan is at all times immobile in countenance and always staring into the camera when she isn’t washing tears off her face.

Biggo Titti, Magnissimo Fellato and Molesto Vagino

Whatever your opinion may be. I'm not a fan of him either, the discussion about the merits or lack of merits of his films can be interesting.

>Bay
What did he mean by this?

Ashes of Time

Suicide Club

Attached: 2786285.jpg (505x720, 71.02K)

This film is fucking amazing. Can't believe someone else hare has seen it

>Thread for the intellectual discussion of arthouse and classic cinema.

Attached: soy291.png (1159x665, 230.73K)

So I saw In the Realm of the Senses, Visitor Q, and Dumplings today.

All 3 movies disturbed me but seemed excellent overall.

Yes.

Attached: ChadwardYang.jpg (540x666, 31.32K)

He felt like he didn't earn the salvation and decided to keep on his promises he made earlier in the film.

>best
In the Mood for Love
>worst
The Grandmaster
>overrated
Chungking Express (second half only; first half is kino)
>underrated
Ashes of Time

Attached: Wong Kar-wai.jpg (659x659, 48.25K)

>3 movies per day
Don't you have anything to do?