Do Marvel movies have good cinematography?

how does someone "stan" for a movie franchise

based and Doylepilled

>Christopher Doyle is an Australian-Hong Kong cinematographer.
>Christopher Doyle was born in Sydney, Australia in 1952. He left his native country on a Norwegian merchant ship at the age of eighteen. While living in other countries, he took on several odd jobs, such as an oil driller in India, a cow herder in Israel, and a doctor of Chinese medicine in Thailand.[2] In the late seventies, Doyle took an interest in Chinese culture, and received the Chinese name Dù Kěfēng, which translates to "like the wind".[3] Following his time as a language student in Taiwan, he started working professionally as a photographer. A couple of years later, he became a cinematographer, working with director Edward Yang in the 1983 film That Day, on the Beach.[4]

what a life

Ragnarok and GOTG had decent visuals. Unfortunately the MCU covers many more "movies" than that.

Common misconception, it actually derives from 14 year olds on Tumblr wanting to have rough unprotected sex with Sebastian Stan.

Based

>OMG WHY DIDN'T THEY FILM IN OUTER SPACE OR OTHER PLANETS IN A DIFFERENT GALAXY OR ALTERNATE DIMENSIONS! THIS MOVIE SUCKS!!

Protip: You're not funny or smart.

Besides Iron Man 1 and a few individual sequences, no

here, you dropped this

Attached: il_570xN.1857486390_758a.jpg (570x425, 37.99K)

Aren't all of those scenes stolen 1:1 from comics

he knows

Attached: kino.jpg (1280x533, 43.43K)

Stalker/Fan

I know a guy named Christopher Doyle wtf

could you explain to us why is this good cinematography?

thats beautiful man

IMPRESSIVE

how to receive chinese name

you have to drink the soup first

For real?

Only thing worse than the cinematography is the 2-3 hours of sample trailer music they use as the 'soundtrack'

No, it's from the M&M song

it tells a story. You don't need context to understand it or the feelings it is trying to convey.
You most likely look immediately at the person because they are bigger and in focus, and then your eyes are drawn along their outstretched arm towards Superman. this both gets you to focus on the outstretched arm, sympathizing with the person, as well as get you to literally look up to superman.
Superman is obscured by the sun behind him, both a symbol for the source of his superpowers as well as for him being a light in the darkness. Also, his relaxed posture contrasts with the billowing cape, showing a sort of strength/ability that is above nature.

only mcu that matters desu

Attached: 1585966299162.png (700x6975, 1.09M)

You're about as pretentious and retarded as Zack Snyder himself my dude

BDH is my mommy

hey you asked. If you think good cinematography isn't important that's fine. I'm pretty sure cinematography is pretty low on the list of things that make a good movie but I think it does add to it and is an interesting topic. Especially with comic book movies because with a comic book you only have still frames to tell a story with in the first place, and nobody wants to read an essay attached to a few cartoon panels, so you'd think the movies would be a bit better with it.

youtube.com/watch?v=RhvVog_3v4U

>no hendricks to be found
incomplete

>Cinematography (from ancient greek κίνημα, kìnema "movement" and γράφειν, gràphein "to write") is the art of motion-picture photography and filming either electronically by means of an image sensor, or chemically by means of a light-sensitive material such as film stock.
cgi is not cinematography

Attached: 1538024802839.jpg (1894x795, 134.79K)

what is the meaning of this shot? no memeing

don't answer, it's a trick. Once you explain he calls you a pretentious faggot

>no arguments

Wrong. CGI imitates digitally or chemical motion picture photography.
There is still a virtual camera in 3D space and all rules of "real" cinematography apply.
Therefore even an fully animated movie has elements of cinematography in it.

no but Daredevil does

Attached: 5077560-2161905167-.jpg (900x600, 65.81K)

wtf do you mean? She's the last one

monster hidden under the surface

Tip of the iceberg. Not everything/everyone is as they seem. Danger lurks beneath where the eyes can't see/see well.

but it looks too funny, i just can't take it seriously

all the shots in these marvel movies ive seen are washed out, lame ass, poorly lit, cgi spammed wallpaper engine-looking shitstains. its like no one working for the entire company for the duration of the entire franchise understands framing/pacing/composition/etc so they just take some grey/brown/blue stock action movie footage and slap a bunch of bad filters on it and call it a day.

mommy

Nigger ook-ooking that brainwashed white people have picked up because being articulate is racist

You're wrong, but I respect your opinion, because you tried to explain it with arguments.

BvS is full of kino shots like this

when there are no actors on screen i think so

You can't capture cinematography in a still. You're all debating photography.

This is trash too. Modern superhero movies (like most modern movies/tv) suck, DC or Marvel.

What exactly is wrong about my argument that there is a virtual camera present in 3D and all artistic rules of classic photographic cinematography apply?
James Cameron created an virtual camera rig so he can move the rig and have the motion translated into the 3D scene so he could frame the rendered shot in an traditional way of "looking through a lens".
It doesn't get more cinematographic than that.
The classic art of cinematography is alive inside the virtual 3D world. There is no doubt about it and you immediately recognize this whenever you see work of an 3D artist who is shit at it.
t.3D artist who is actually pretty decent with framing, composition and movement.

>being this autistic

>not liking superhero shit equals to being autistic

nice reasoning there user

i was talking about the fact that he thinks that every super hero movies are the same