>greets harry, extends his hand in friendship
>says his name
>ugly ginger laughs @ him, of course feels humiliated
>defends himself and is seen as bad guy
Reminder Malfoy did nothing wrong
this post scares the Potter
Freddie Stroma is relentlessly handsome.
Ron is in fact a seething uggo who can't stand Malfoy's superior genes, thus he attempts to mock him in the hopes that he can get one over the ubermensch of wizarding society.
You know who did something wrong? Rowling, by writing the books that would lead to the creation of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Someone post the gif of him shrugging
>anglo-saxon bad!
If this is not a copypasta then I salute you, user.
It is an incredibly widespread pasta, present on every Harry Potter thread. And many non-harry potter threads. I suspect you of being new.
what
Go back
Definitely a copypasta bucko. The fun part is that whoever posts usually makes a unique intro relating to the OP.
shameful
>falling for the bait
There are over 9000 instances of this in the various Yas Forums archives.
>falling for the double reverse b8
I've been on this site since 2012 yet I feel ashamed and new.
Not sure if this is bait or reddit
Fucking reddit fags
>falling for the reverse double reverse bait
Harry Potter is like a Boomer moms perfect world come to life and it's a fucking nightmare if you spend just one second thinking about it.
You literally get sorted by how "special" you are and count as a villain as soon as you think a little bit pragmatical and not like you've grown up on consumerist Hollywood Schmalz. Fuck Harry Potter.
I've never encountered this copypasta before, and I've been here for years, does this make me a newfag anyway?
recently read a fanfic wherein Harry Potter becomes a pimp by abducting various girls and using magic to transform them into perfect fucktoys, then sell them off to magical brothels and whorehouses for a fortune. It was based as all fuck, and weirdly enough was written by a tumblr femoid despite being the most miss soggy knees thing I've ever read.
yes
What was his tax policy?
malfoy got destroyed at every turn early on. for what? he never asked to be in this position. created a monster for what?
youtube.com
Reminder that Voldemort did nothing wrong and that racemixing with muggles actually decreases magical abilities, thus muggles will eventually fight and overcome wizards in the long run.
No it makes you a retard
>Getting bullied by poor people
link it
Why didn't they do the kino thing and make Malfoy defy his father and then become friends with Harry at the end instead of running away?
>starts off with him wanting to be friends
>ends with him just running away
It would have been pottery if he became friends instead
Because they need a villain for the next movies
Because that would have made Harry less right. Harry thought Malfoy was bad from the beginning, so Malfoy has to always be bad.
Based
the problem with Voldemport and the "pureblood"s position in general is that there doesn't appear to be any evidence whatsoever to support the idea that purebloods are inherently more powerful at magic. In fact all evidence in the show seems to suggest that magic either just works or it doesn't, and the only real modifiers for success is the quality of wand you own and how quickly/skillfully you can perform the components (which is pretty much just a matter of IQ).
Taking into consideration the personality of Rowling, she probably intended the pureblood concept to be factually wrong and just a racism allegory.
bc Rowling is a hack
archiveofourown.org
Not sure if it's very good but it's got a Harry Potter that keeps sex slaves, so it fits the bill of being somewhat based. And unexpected, considering the kind of people who write on AO3 probably hyperventilate at the mere mention of rape.
desu some of the spells in Harry Potter are so shit that just taking a 9mm to a wizard is enough to kill most of them.
there's probably an easy charm spell that deflects mundane projectiles
also a wizard could just use that disarm spell if they see a gun.
which makes you wonder why they even give a shit about the muggles if they're no real threat to them
I don't think it would be a trivial thing to kill a skilled wizard but that doesn't mean muggles aren't a threat. They can still kill their children and it would probably be difficult to deal with something like a large bomb.
Realistically though Rowling is still a hack though even if you're nice and make some assumptions to make the world work, becuse wizards are a shadowy hidden force that literally know mind control spells and aren't afraid to use them. The wizards willing to use the mind control spell should have long ago taken over the muggle world
indeed, but Rowling is a moralfag.
>40652 words
based
How can one be so based and also redpilled?
Read Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality. Harry rejects Ron knowing him to be a Quidditch-loving retard of low intelligence and social standing and opts to become friends with Malfoy instead, knowing him to be intelligent and of a powerful family.
Most Reddit thing ever written.
Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality was just neil degrasse tyson levels of fedora tipping to me, I couldn't take it seriously at all.
>she probably intended the pureblood concept to be factually wrong
Considering Hermione is a mudblood, and the top three most powerful wizards, Voldemort, Dumbledore, and Snape are all half bloods while Bellatrix is the only remotely powerful pureblood, I would have to agree
Malfoy had the best banter in the books.
>Honestly, if you were any slower, you’d be going backwards
>Longbottom, if brains were gold you’d be poorer than Weasley, and that’s saying something
>You know how I think they choose people for the Gryffindor team? […] It’s people they feel sorry for. See, there’s Potter, who’s got no parents, then there’s the Weasleys, who’ve got no money – you should be on the team, Longbottom, you’ve got no brains
>You’d better hurry up, they’ll be waiting for ‘the Chosen Captain’ – ‘The Boy Who Scored’ – whatever they call you these days
>Why didn't they do the kino thing and make Malfoy defy his father and then become friends with Harry at the end
Well he sorto of did. He knew it was Harry, Hermione and Ron who was taken to the Malfoy manor, but he didn't say it was.
they just couldn't handle the banter, typical normies...
>and the top three most powerful wizards, Voldemort, Dumbledore, and Snape
>Snape
>while Bellatrix is the only remotely powerful pureblood
Wtf are you on about?
James Potter and Sirius Black was the best in their year according to Lupin. Snape wasn't even near Dumbledore or Voldemort's powerlevels
Yes
>See, there’s Potter, who’s got no parents, then there’s the Weasleys, who’ve got no money – you should be on the team, Longbottom, you’ve got no brains
exquisite
Snape was easily the 3rd most powerful wizard. Sure, he couldn't beat Dumbledore or Voldemort, but he was still the 3rd best.
mcgonagall beat him
have an upvote good user sir
Didn't he easily deflect her shit when she was ACTUALLY trying to kill him as she didn't know he was good?
There was a deleted scene at the end of DH Part 2 where Draco redeems himself by throwing Harry his wand to help him beat Voldermort.
they should have ended up together
You cant tell shit from this
Okay Yates.
Never forget:
HOWEVER
xD!!!!
Is this new bait, or are you genuinely clueless?
He let her win to protect the students from harm.
Dumbledore's a pureblood
This. He even deflects her attacks into the death eaters and takes their wands.
> all the strongest wizards are purebloods
uh, what the yuck rowling