>adultery?
>sure
>kill one dude to save tens of thousands more?
>no, it would be dishonorable!
>adultery?
>sure
>kill one dude to save tens of thousands more?
>no, it would be dishonorable!
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
the most interesting character in the whole movie was the German, but they immediately killed him off
Honor before hoes
It was a disappointing movie
And I’m not a Christian, but the way it made Christians the 1D bad guys and completely left out the fact Muslims had been invading Christian lands for centuries first was a little retarded
Just saying that it was a two way street. If the Christians are bad for counterattacking then the Muslims are equally bad
And Saladin sold most of the Christians of Jerusalem into slavery, he didn’t give them safe conduct
Can you remind me what are you talking about? I don't remember it exactly.
You know you can fuck girls and still have a code of honor right?
The best part was when the 50 or so cavalry charged the whole saracen vanguard for some reason.
Welcome to Ridley "The Agenda" Scott.
Watch the movie
>what is character development
also that guy murdered his brother
that being said knight committing adultery with the queen is a common medieval trope
Most got out of ransom and for those who couldn't pay, Saladin bought them himself released them immediately
>And I’m not a Christian, but the way it made Christians the 1D bad guys and completely left out the fact Muslims had been invading Christian lands for centuries first was a little retarded
Yeah, because they expect viewers not to be retards (unlike you) and know what the backdrop to the fucking Crusade is. How the fuck would they display hundreds of centuries of wars in a movie? It's not a documentary
>If the Christians are bad for counterattacking then the Muslims are equally bad
Only simpletons like you think in a good/bad dichotomy
>And Saladin sold most of the Christians of Jerusalem into slavery, he didn’t give them safe conduct
Yet his christian contemporaries like richard the lionheart still praised him, unlike dumb Yas Forumstards like you
who to believe about saladin, richard the lionheart or this fat little amerimutt?
>Templars bad
>Knights Hospitaller good
in fact templars also protected muslim pilgrims and hospitallers also raided muslim caravans
>that being said knight committing adultery with the queen is a common medieval trope
yeah today, back then it would have been a very serious thing and should be treated as such in a movie
there were just a few christian characters portrayed as bad, like raynald of châtillon, who was viewed negatively by both muslims and christians
His post was perfectly innocent. Why are you so triggered?
because he's a retard, likely to be some kind of spic beaner nigger mutt
>tfw
calm down, kid
You know such a code was steered by religion more than anything right?
>Most got out of ransom and for those who couldn't pay, Saladin bought them himself released them immediately
For nobility, yes.
At least 15,000 people were sold into slavery.
>How the fuck would they display hundreds of centuries of wars in a movie?
By mentioning why they Crusade instead of saying it was for land and wealth. Like maybe pointing out that all of North Africa, Egypt, and the Levant used to be Christian before the Caliphate
You're not wrong.
this
before that they were pagan
And Jewish!
and black
I am so mad this hollywood action movie wasn't completely historically accurate.
No.
What a weapon.
youtu.be
Don't label historical then. Say it's a fictional story based in historical events or something like that.
>"You ride to certain death."
>"All death is certain. I shall tell your father what I've seen you become."
Kino
>Legolas to God
are you retarded? it IS historical fiction, it never claimed to be a documentary.
Balian of Ibelin existed in reality, what are you talking about?
en.wikipedia.org
Wait, he wasn't a French blacksmith?
Why do people think fucking some random hoe willingly is a worse moral sin than taking a life?
judeo-islamo-christian morals
Even in Christianity/Judaism, murder comes before adultery in the ten commandments.
the commandments aren't rankings, they're all equally bad
He was born in the Kingdom of Jerusalem and in the movie is when he was in England making a course on blacksmith.
It's probably the most retardedly written of Ridley Scott's better films.
Sorry, in France.
who said he didn't exist? it's still not a documentary, it's a dramatisation, why would you ever expect hollywood trash to be accurate, it's not trying to educate you.
do you get mad at other movies like braveheart, gladiator, last samurai for not being a 1:1 retelling of historical events?
He was a widower, he didn't commit adultery.
Also his whole motivation for going to Jerusalem was that he killed his own brother in a fit of rage because he decapitated his wife's corpse and told him she's going to hell. He didn't want to be responsible for murder, even if it was for a greater cause.
>didn't get Iain Glen to play Richard the Lionheart in Robin Hood
Jesus, Ridley is such a hack.
correct
What a rabid, autistic response. Chill the fuck out
hair kino
Tiberius or whatever his name is, the hospitaller dude, is hands down the most interesting character, with some people thinking it is God incarnated in order to speak to Ibelin (hence his appearance out of nowhere at times)
it was 90% for land and wealth, religion was an excuse
he's a jew
and trans
she wasnt a widow
she was a nigger lover?
Yes, but unironically
Based and correct post
jesus, you really don't know anything about the topic
He also married Byzantine princess
Nobles could pay their own ransom
I'm talking about poorfags who couldn't pay their own, in that case the ransom was paid by others such as Balian, Bishop of Jerusalem (he's portrayed as a bitch in the movie when he was a good guy IRL) and Saladin himself