Marx

Insane schizo

Attached: 1582394160368.png (549x395, 206.5K)

Libertarians don't think, so they don't have anything in common with any philosopher.
No Ayn Rand wasn't a philosopher she was just a hateful cunt who wrote weird porn.

>The number of pages Marx and Engels devote to attacking Stirner in the unexpurgated text of The German Ideology exceeds the total of Stirner's written works.

Attached: MAx Stirner.jpg (200x237, 11.26K)

>Libertarians don't think, so they don't have anything in common with any philosopher.
That's a very interesting opinion.

Yeah. That's how philosophers win. Nobody fucking knows who Stirner is anymore now do they?

It works as Black is a kike himself.

Oooh Marx seething!

>comedy movie with jack black as a lazy, NEETish marx
I'd watch it

You'd probably get a kick out of Asscreed Marx being a succdem who condemns violence and advocates liberal democracy

Attached: ETfw1nOUwAEdUbN.jpg (2200x2278, 967.33K)

>popular=right

Attached: 1577197823836.png (380x366, 3.37K)

Was he Yas Forums?

Attached: marx.png (669x218, 51.04K)

Why do you post gay Koreon cartoon pornography in every thread?

Do you know anything about Marx? He wasn't a dictator you retard, he was some guy who wrote a tonne of social science and neglected his family.

To cause your bowels to become upset

Attached: ETtbbl0UUAEi-m_.jpg (2977x1045, 702.23K)

I like that artist, I just want to know what your endgame is.

Geoffrey Tambor

The agitation of anons

Attached: DyhaslnVYAAGY73.jpg (1200x824, 166.58K)

Jack black is jewish

Charlatan

And?

You dont seem to know much about libertarians...
or philosophy...
or anything for that matter...

Too be fair Marx and Engels were machines when it came to writing

Attached: Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe_(MEGA2).jpg (1430x2800, 1.33M)

It seems that Corona has rotted your brain, I'm so sorry.

Whats with commies and trying to distance themselves from liberals these days. I thought they wanted the same thing

This movie is pretty good btw

Attached: Young Karl Marx.jpg (1631x2520, 809.32K)

>He hasn't seen the anime

Attached: MarxAnime.png (641x541, 278.68K)

Marx was based. Wrong about the future of proletariat and deluded prophesies of a workers revolution but some thing he got right. Marxian economics are overrated, and he was a dirty jew but nonetheless, he was an important philosopher for the whole world.
Frankfurt school neomarxists disagreed with him too of the future of the proletariat. I may agree with some of them but their obsessive thought of objective evil is where I disagree with those jews. They think fascism is objectively evil, and don't even try to understand the causes for it. Most of the "scholars" who study fascism today are just neomarxist redditors who are bigoted and entrenched in their views of black/white world of good and evil.

I hope the jews get what they deserve and their ideological prophets exposed to the world what they really are. enemies of true free thinkers, enemies of free peoples of europe. enemies of working class. I hope you americans, all volks and tribes, mutts and pureblooded will be free of your jewish overlords some day.

Attached: 8920029d.jpg (900x593, 128.47K)

>never had a job yet considered himself an expert on them
>hated capitalism yet was supported by his rich friend
lol this fucking guy was the greatest charlatan in history.

>liberals these days
>these days
Liberalism has always been about the preservation of capitalism, just unlike straight reactionary capitalism it'd tout token "liberties" and "freedoms" that needed to be fought for
Things that had no impact whatsoever on the underlying system, but gave the appearance of "struggle" against inequality
Marx even at the beginning rejected feminists and those euros who wanted reparations and apologies for colonialism because he knew it didn't matter how many millionaire women or how many colonies you turned into liberal democracies, they'd still operate under the same horrors of capital
Likewise liberals first rejects icons of leftist sentiment while they're alive, then sterilize and castrate and reshape them when they're dead
MLK had to fight very hard to get even the minor victory of Civil Rights, but they murdered him the instant he started talking about financial inequality and expunged it from the histories taught in schools and pop
Che was completely turned into a product after his death
They're working on stripping Karl and Lenin of all revolutionary process and paint "leftist struggle" as mere peaceful demonstrations and democracy
They support nothing in terms of the abolition of property, public/worker ownership, freedoms of democratic process (they're the first to tout democracy when they win, but throw it away when they lose), the redistribution of wealth and abolition of stockholders
tl;dr - Liberals are in no way fucking left

Attached: 4963626597da2d75.jpg (1339x1615, 1.39M)

He also survived on the money given to him by a rich socialist (Engles).

Imagine Jojo Rabbit but with cartoon Stalin or Mao

Jews are trying to destroy the white race

Werner Herzog.

Attached: 160122_sundance8769-1.jpg (780x1168, 245.64K)

Yes, that was Marx's goal after all.

>"struggle" against inequality

You seem to be under the impression that this is a good thing.

Which means they already fucked your brain.

Why?

Yes the actual struggle against inequality, manifesting post-industrial as wage slavery, is a viable struggle
The liberal "struggles" don't matter
It doesn't matter if half the billionaires are black trannies, the control of all wealth, and thus individual freedoms in a system that relies on wealth, is still in the hands of an oppressive minority class

Attached: c8eab2b27b23de23.jpg (1075x1432, 387.69K)

That would be true if Marx said he himself was going to be revolutionary. But he didn't, he said the proletariat would be the revolutionary class, not his, so its not hypocrisy at all.

Marx wasn't jewish. He was Lutheran.

based.

>opressive minority class
Yeah thats just human nature. No matter what system you use there always has to be a bunch of people at the bottom and a few at the top.

No, you're thinking of Kant.

>"human nature"
>only applies to 1% of the human race
Okay...

No, he was baptised as a Lutheran. Which would make perfect sense as the religion Marx would pick if you even vaguely know anything about Marx and Martin Luther.

Where in my post did it say it only affected 1% of humans?

>popularity
Sounds like spooks to me

Attached: compassion.jpg (436x526, 109.84K)

t's defeatist rhetoric to say "That's just the way it is" when history has shown we can and have managed to have much more equal systems in terms of the distribution of oppressions and horrors

Attached: DxRR1w7UYAAB6rp.jpg (900x1200, 147.04K)

In a macro scale maybe. We could sacrifice efficiency for the sake of our mental welfare and go back to our primitive roots. Rule ourselves in our villages, living real life. Connected to our work, family and tribe, not wageslaving in a city of million strangers.

If such a small percentage of the human race exploits the rest for profit, then its a pretty poor argument to say that it's just "human nature" to behave that way.

Hirachy is rooted in our DNA, equality is a worthless concept and leads to injustice.

>managed to have more equal systems
Like what? Eventually the inevitable happens and entities will naturally comw together to form sttonger and more unified groups
>its defeatist
Not really. Always someone that needs replacing at the top. Its just that people don't like to admit that theres usually a cost for being the top dog.
Theres more then just two groups of people. I would say only about 50 or 40 percent of people are completely boned

I believe the argument is that everyone will behave the same way. There cannot be a philosopher-king who doesn't find the power and greed irresistible. Even the most devoted communist will think to himself that *he* will never let power or greed corrupt him.

A counter argument could be something about Platons utopia.
but how is this related to Yas Forums anyway? I just want more philosophical drama.

"equality...leads to injustice"
That's not even a coherent concept.
Your argument is such a shitpost. For most of its existence the human race survived without a complex hierarchy. Once we started developing hierarchy we accelerated the destruction of our species rapidly.

It's really easy to refute your belief that everyone would behave the same way, simply because if you read history, everyone hasn't behaved that way. Native American tribes and other indigenous people didn't behave that way. Aboriginal Australians didn't behave that way. Africans didn't behave that way - except when certain chiefs were corrupted by european colonizers.

I don't know what the OP is saying but I don't think the invention of hierarchies started ruining us. Try managing hundreds of people without some set command structure

Generally just mild to extreme socialist systems managed to vastly improve the lives of hundreds of millions of people simply by making it a guarantee that food and shelter would be provided
The current system is "you will work or you will die, and if you attempt to survive outside of our system you are a criminal and we will either kill you or limit your minimal freedoms"
Even going back hundreds of years, when tradesmen owned their tools, their shops and likewise farmers owned the land and whatnot, they were more "free"
They had homes they could live in and provide for themselves and if they wanted more they could work harder/produce more than necessary
>Hirachy is rooted in our DNA
No it isn't, peterson
The pursuit of an equal starting point, in the needs of having your base needs met, in no way leads to "inequality" except in the fact that yes, those who were in an obscene wealth or authority would have their positions, and their exploitation, greatly diminished

Attached: Dl8TkqDVAAACq-L.jpg (417x342, 48.81K)

Sorry, rereading your post, I realize that you didn't actually state that that was the opinion you hold.

The man behind nazis and communists

>socialist system where food and shelter would be provided
How will you pay and or get resources to maintain this way though? You could have the people work but that wouldn't be any different from our current system
>tradesman and farmers
Thats still just working except the punishment was "I will work or I will starve because I failed to tend my crops or I failed to sell enough tools" and thats not even counting local lords or kings you would have to listen to. At least now a days you can work a hell of a lot less for more output unless you really want to try to live like olden day peasanta.

I believe it is not tied to culture in any way. Human nature is not to be underestimated but generalizing anything about human behavior is a mistake. It's incredible this subject has been studied for over two millennia and nobody really knows what is the utopia and are we going towards it or are we running from it.

Justice is a river. Science is political. All lifeforms are selfish. Taxes are forced altruism. We live in a society. I hate women.

Attached: efa95fb92f43872129b93cf0dcdf57c9.jpg (850x400, 67.5K)

Wrong dude meant to go to

The power level of a chieftan compared to any colonial ruler is much different. If the roles were reversed you would have the same shit happening