only incels dislike the harry potter films
Only incels dislike the harry potter films
yeah I'm an incel, got a problem with that?
I like the first three films
the later ones take themselves too seriously
2=1>3=4>5>>.1>>>>.2
The first couple movies are cool
Idk if I’d say they’re good
2=1>3=4>8>7>5>6
>3=4
lolwut
the first 3 are really nice tho
4,5 and 6 were meh, the rest were good with 3 being the best
But I've never even seen them...
I don't think having the sex life of Casanova or Christian XXX would even blunt having to watch the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
a-at least the books were good though
"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Meds: not taken
Voices on the wall: heard
Math class: failed
Yep, it's schizo time.
4 is the film where the characters most feel their age desu
why trannies like them so much
4>1>2>3>5>6>7pt1>7pt2
bad, not funny pasta
he just tried to be really expressive, u npcs so hungry
I’m an incel and I love HP
Trannies also like burgers and fries.
With that information you can finally eat healthier and stop being fat.
why would Ron leave such a loving and caring gf
Fine intro but no clifford so 5/10
>2=1>3=4>5>>(Dead).1>>(Dead)>>(Dead).2
what did he mean by this?
Only women and estrogen fueled faggots like Harry Potter flicks.
Fact.
i once made an OC harry potter apu based on that pic lol
so i do, thanks for your concern
Lol I got my dick sucked last night and Harry Potter is awful.
I don't dislike them, I've never seen them and I never will. But I'm also obsessed with Emma Watson's anus
I like it user! well done!
:)
This is probably true but Book 6 was the best.
3>5>6>2>1>4>7.1>7.2
>books
based
2 is probably the worst one in my opinion
I’ve technically seen some of them, but usually I was sucking face with whatever chick had me over to watch them
Saved
Thanks fren
You never read them? I read them back in 3-4th grade. Man I couldn’t put the damn things down. Those were the days.
the way that Hermione ended up with a guy like Ron Wesley is such a boner killer desu
4>3>7.1>6>1>2>5>7.2
It's still one of the best teenage movies I've seen so far.
thank you frens
I hated how the costume design team got lazy third film and on, everyone wearing muggle clothes in their spare time and shit.
I read the 7th one before the final films came out
mother dearest also read some of the last book to me. very comfy times
I also listened to the audio books with my family when we used to go on long car journeys to see my extended family
The only reason she ended up with Ron was Rowling felt that pairing her author avatar character with the hero Harry was too arrogant feeling, so she stuck Hermione with a complete loser like her first husband was.
>Ron was a loser
Didn't he save harry's dumb ass multiple times?
yeah but be real he has that loser vibe around him.
It's canon that the Weasley kids wear muggle clothes on holidays while their parents wear wizard clothes. Yet somehow Mr. Weasley still doesn't know how to dress like a muggle when the need arises. It's mentioned somewhere near the start of the GoF book I think.
based
truth but no surprise Yas Forums has a daily thread for it
Nah. Harry potter films destroyed modern film making in hollywood.
Finished
This, sadly the 4th movie ruined my interest in the series. It's honestly worse than the average young adult fantasy fiction movie, which is already a low bar to meet.
dont care the films are still good
even so please elaborate
>hang around with the famous boy
>gets constantly assmad that Harry and his brothers get attention and noone gives a shit about him because he has 0 zero personality or interesting traits
Younger siblings are hilariously pathetic desu.
He was a shitty ass friend at times, like how he ditched Harry in GoF.
>best mate keeps saying he didn't enter the deadly tournament
>dont believe him until he almost fucking dies against a dragon
Most people wouldn't take such a fairweather friend back afterwords, Harry is just mentally fucked up from his shitty childhood he can't let go of the first kid to be his friend.
I want to hug luna!
>youngest sibling lets older ones live in their head rent-free then whine about not being able to form their own identity
>massive inferiority complex and manlet-tier paranoia that older siblings are laughing at them when they actually don't think about them at all
Yeah, sounds about right.
3>7>1>6>5>4>2>8
1=3>52
lmao what no
that would be the prequels my friend
The story telling is dog shit bad and led to Jj Abrams shit. Heres the problem abd the plot
Harry and friends find themswlvee in a bind boom some new unknown magic or character saves them
Over and over again. Its literally deus ex machina that rowling tried to explain in later books..
Palp coming back from the dead randomly has nothing on how bad a single harry potter movie is like this.
Just shitty story telling. Its like rowling started at mid act 2 every book then went to act 1 then to act 2 again then to 3 back to 1...
Just batshit
>4 best
patrician taste
really brainy film critique there
Who else has he got besides Hermione though?
Seamus, Dean and Neville are just as fairweather. Parvati and Lavender are Stacy brainlets. Anyone from other houses turn on him at the drop of a hat. The Weasleys let him pretend to have a family. He wouldn't give that up over Ron being a dipshit.
incel
This is Yas Forums fren
Seriously its ever potter boom and movie repeat
Crazy shits happening
Magic or character you didnt know saves them
Repeat
Then at the end the characters, rules and settings are revealed...
Thats such a back asswards and bad way to tell a story lets be honest
worth the $28 i paid for it
normie chicks loves these movies