Why isn't television and film shot at 60fps?
The hobbit movies looked like shit at 48fps, but 60fps video looks fine, and they don't use it. I don't get it.
Why isn't television and film shot at 60fps?
Colton Lewis
Other urls found in this thread:
Chase Wright
>live to see the end of the Lord of the Rings trilogy
>cry in tears as Hollywood has achieved the peak of art, even knowing to use CGI as touchup and not as vomit
>await in eagerness the wonders that Hollywood will release now that it has reached this level of professionalism
>still waiting in 2020
Jaxon Murphy
Because it would cost jews more money. They want their shitty tech so they don't have to shell out more.
Which is why places like Youtube and streaming will overtake them eventually.
William Taylor
Soul vs soulless
Oliver Young
The human eye can't see more than 24 fps. The reason they did 48 fps is because you have 2 eyes. 24 * 2 = 48. Go read a Wikipedia article and educate yourself.
Adrian Parker
60fps is just as uncanny as the 48fps.
Movies should stay 24
Nolan Martin
aren't really shitty BBC dramas shot at 60 fps?
Caleb Jackson
Movies are usually 24 fps
Hobbit looked like shit because it had too many fps
Mason Edwards
movie cameras are expensive, they wont just throw them out.
60FPS CGI is twice as expensive to produce.
theaters would need to buy in new projectors, they cant cope with 60FPS.
Jordan Rivera
Shitty console hardware can't handle it LMAO