Any kino with this feel ?

thatch literally gladiator summed up in one pick

t.

Attached: GREEKFAGS.jpg (450x313, 44.37K)

>bros chilling out having a good time

woah...

Attached: Akropolis_by_Leo_von_Klenze.jpg (1486x1018, 184.81K)

those are just aristocracy faggots

Attached: 83667a8005313ca195808d9262b91586.jpg (1260x630, 128.37K)

>"Husband, let me tell you about these children who were born during your uninterrupted absence of five years"

Spirited Away from your picture gives me similar vibes. Also My Neightbor Tototro

t.

Attached: GREEKHOMOS.jpg (1024x1000, 119.57K)

can someone shoop some robots in the background

>you will never be a rich greek spending all day philosophizing about random shit

Attached: ImportantMadGiantschnauzer-max-1mb[2].gif (260x260, 851.21K)

>two men wrestling
>nordcuck automatically assumes their gay

Attached: nordicarchitecture.jpg (2213x1660, 709.38K)

how did meds go from the most advanced to medicore shite while nords went from literal african niggers to one of the most advanced

they stole roman technology and the binding force of christianity.

Attached: 4745895.gif (200x200, 978.49K)

the greeks were fags

History is strange bro.

Attached: 120318-77-Ancient-History-Egypt-Architectur-Palace-Cities-Urban.jpg (800x436, 161.26K)

christianity is gay and ruined rome though

Lord of the rings

I could if i wanted

no, it saved rome, you degenerate homo.

Civilisations like humans rise and fall

before christianity
>rome exists
after christianity
>rome no longer exists
checkmate atheist

They only learned that from surviving Atlantean influence

The empire divided in half. The east empire (referred to as the byzantine) was Christian and survived for awhile. You're wrong

Rome existed for hundreds of years after Christianity

AHHHAHAHAHAHAHA
I fucking doubt it
they literally lent the goths in because they tought they were christian brothers
if only julian didnt died on the battlefield

also im 100 % sure that the pontifex maximus wouldnt have called att*la the scourge of jupiter

Attached: GJ2GaGH.jpg (1920x1088, 542.63K)

Rome was going down before then. Christianity was only able to thrive because the roman elite created a hostile, corrupt material world.

Attached: 06afeedd-c6c3-40ff-88c8-035fd5e2da4d.jpg (568x346, 42.84K)

the eastern roman empire died with heraclius the last roman in 610

after that it was just a greek christian state

gothic civilization was a higher civilization than rome

how many before?

>meds go from the most advanced to medicore shite
racemixing
>nords went from literal african niggers to one of the most advanced
Feudal manoral system genetically selected for the breakup of clans, and during the medieval ages the upper classes replaced the lower classes 2x in cumulative terms. Also execution for petty crimes reduced the "violent genes" per se in the population. Overall resulting in a genetic change from 1000 AD - 1600 AD whereby the noblemen and aristocracy's genetics of 1000 AD were similar to the poor man's of 1600 AD. Over this period the average IQ of NW Europeans raised from 82 to the modern 100.

700 if you count the death of Jesus as the beginning of christianity

Sperg shit. Major historical movements aren't determined by shit like this because God is not a sperg.

how did they determine the old IQ of 82?

he's a retard and is literally pulling all these "facts" out of his ass, see this for the IQ part
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect

Without "genetic changes influencing things" we wouldn't have history as we know it.
>God is not a sperg
Controlling every detail of the universe seems pretty spergy. Besides if we were made in his image that includes spergs
There's a couple ways they do this, analyzing genetic info and comparing to modern populations, this can include molecular genetics. Also just skull(brain) measuring, which is obviously less reliable but useful for either short term changes or prehistoric long term periods, but not really across populations.
I think the Alternative Hypothesis guy on his video on the European Revolution might have talked about that number a bit.

What's your point, that IQs raised everywhere? Oh wait, except they didn't raise nearly as much in the case of Mediterraneans, who averaged about 90 in Rome and are now 96. (Sure the average went up- but NW Euros surpassed them in the Renaissance)

>Oh wait,

don't do that passive aggressive gay reddit shit here

Attached: 1567697305157.png (782x689, 560.18K)

bump

>Black Knight 2 never EVER
I wish swords and sandals wasn't dead

Attached: Screenshot_20200403-232015_YouTube.jpg (1422x922, 441.14K)

mediaval isnt sword and sandal

Um, ok sweetie... oh you sweet summer child. Faith in humanity lost. I mean, boy, that escalated quickly. That's enough internet for me today. Your post was bad, you should feel bad. Right in the feels. This is why we can't have nice things. Some men just want to watch the world burn. I think there's a relevant XKCD about your post. Just sayin'... you really rustled my jimmies. Stahp. I'll show myself out.

Athens was the San Francisco of the Ancient World. You think their based because academia focuses on their writings only

>IQ is determined solely by genetics
A claim as unscientific as it is stupid but okay, could be plausible (even though it's not)
>we can accurately predict IQ based on the genetic tests despite the fact that genes variations are one of the most complex things in science
Now you are just wading straight in the full blown "retarded" territory.

I suggest you read a book instead of some schizo online blogs/youtube channels.

>IQ is determined solely by genetics
Never claimed this. In the modern US IQ is about 80% heritable. In the past due to a wider variation in environments, it was probably a somewhat lower heritability, but was always significantly heritable.
>we can accurately predict IQ based on the genetic tests
>Now you are just wading straight in the full blown "retarded" territory
We can't predict IQ with extreme specificity, but we can get pretty close, and give pretty good evidence for changes within a population over time. This is obviously even a lot easier than comparing across populations or when there is a mixing/replacement event because in cases like the European change the morphology remains otherwise very similar.
You also don't NEED to use molecular genetics. We don't need to know every gene associated with intelligence, to compare based on genetics. Molecular genetics help and we can use known gene variations associated with intelligence to compare with the past, but this only gives a partial picture. If we only used molecular genetics then things like twin studies and adoption studies couldn't exist for example, but they do and are significantly more reliable than our current limited molecular genetics information.

the roman empire has literally never fallen, as long as there is a pope the empire lives on

>Christianity
>Rome

KYS

you first, you degenerate pagan with no beliefs or morals.

>you degenerate pagan with no beliefs or morals.

Attached: fastpass to heaven.png (366x258, 144.84K)

imagine being this much of a sperg, the entire roman empire was literally built around absorbing everything around them, from greek religon and lifestyle to giving citizenship to those they conquered. Read a book faggot and then neck yourself.

Im no pagan or atheist you dumbass

>takes over 500 years to accept christianity
>we wuz christians n sheeeeeet

>Greek religion

Jupiter and Mars were there from the beginning of Rome

You neck yourself, Christianity literally doomed Rome

Julian and diocletian were right

>MUH WEATFIELDS OF EURVPA

lol sad af

and also even by the 400s, only 5 % of the roman empire was christian
its only by the dark ages and the 600 that 100 % of the people began to adopt christianity