Have they ever said anything heartfelt and unironic?

Have they ever said anything heartfelt and unironic?

Attached: fqpk4l5hz3sx.jpg (1280x720, 101.67K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=EPx9OA9sz7A
youtube.com/watch?v=OrNBEhzjg8I
vice.com/read/camille-paglia-believes-that-revenge-of-the-sith-is-our-generations-greatest-work-of-art
newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/what-the-seven-star-wars-films-reveal-about-george-lucas
youtube.com/watch?v=Ibkmh72_1pw
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Is this what happens if you turn 40 and still don't have a wife?

Jay became Chad.

Jay is gay and has a boyfriend.

That really really old video of Mike and his friends having a Phantom Menace viewing party and he said George Lucas just massacred his entire childhood.

That was probably the last honest thing he ever said, because his psyche was shattered into a million pieces.

Lol rich and Mike hit the wall fucking hard!

Here's every Half In The Bag

Jay: "Hey did you hear about this new movie"
Mike: "Oh yeah you mean the newest installment of the franchise where the guy does the thing"
Jay: "Yes exactly. Well it turns out that this one is shit too"
Mike: *spits out his beer* WHAAAAAAAAAAT?????????

Their Picard reviews are pretty genuine and heartbreaking

mike is really wasting his good looks by being a fat ass

You got the obligatory fuck the people that take films seriously.

That only proves how the Plinkett reviews were totally hit pieces. Fuck Mike.

They're still completely and totally accurate. It is just unfortunate that he isn't equally as harsh on the new trilogy.

Jay is a snide little faggot.

>It is just unfortunate that he isn't equally as harsh on the new trilogy.
Well thats because he emotionally distanced himself from it enough that it was okay that they were shit.
You can tell by his opinions on the prequel trilogy that he was personally hurt and offended by how bad they were.

>ironic
Wisconsinites are incapable of any higher order thought, making irony impossible. You might be describing that thing where a nobody criticizes something in a cunty tone.

>look at that fucking discrageful photo
I can't imagine going an entire life being an ugly fucking monkey just to pile onto it by getting fat during the last years you have a chance in hell of fucking.

Ya it's pretty fucked up

Fucking please. It's because Disney put some cash in his wallet.

>That only proves how the Plinkett reviews were totally hit pieces.
well duh you stupid fuck. youre dumb

Mike is pretty sincere about Star Trek, but he's too timid to really express himself and quickly returns to his shroud of irony.

I wonder if anyone believes this unironically?

Mike and Rich talking about Trek
Jay talking about indie horror
also Mike talking about ghosts which is the weirdest thing

>Mike and Rich talking about Trek
most people do not know that Mr. Plinkett series started off with Star Trek

youtube.com/watch?v=EPx9OA9sz7A

>Mike is a superstitious alcoholic in his 40's obsessed with children's media
Yeesh.

WHERE THE FUCK IS THE STAR TREK PICARD SEASON FINALE REVIEW!?!?!

Attached: maxresdefault (4).jpg (1280x720, 91.39K)

yeah thats the one

Jay and giallo films. Also Friday the 13th, in the F13 The Game livestream Jay started nerding out.

>heartfelt and unironic?
Jay Bauman, director of Space Cop, on the director Todd Philips
>I was always fascinated by him, even though his movies are shit. Joker is clearly a derivative of movies like Taxi Driver or King of Comedy and it shows.
Jay Bauman, director of Pork Pork in Space, on women in film
>Dude I enjoy the most grotesque and despicable movies imaginable but if there's a rape scene in there we're going to have a problem. A female nudity is the worst thing to ever happen on film, besides a rape scene
Jay Bauman, director of Space Cop, on the director Rian Johnson.
>I wouldn't call The Last Jedi bad. It's messy. It's a messy movie, but it's definetaly not a bad movie. I must point out, even though it's completely irrelevant, that rey isn't a mary sue in this film. Mike, are you read to mention how we hate TLJ, even though we never say it was a bad movie?
Mike Stoklasa, director of The Recovered on the director JJ Abrams and George Lucas
>JJ Abrams should have directed the prequels and George Lucas should have directed people to their seats in the theater.
Rich Evans, producer of Gorilla Interrupted on Ready Player One
>the main character shouldn't be a boring wet straight white rice male motherfucker.
Mike Stoklasa, director of Oranges: Revenge of the Eggplants on Star Wars The Force Awakens
>I loved it. It was everything I hoped it would be. But I was disappointing but the lack of interracial romance in film. I hoped there would be romance between Rey and Finn, or Finn and Poe. The movie really lacked that.
Rich Evans, actor from Recipe for Disaster: A Monkey Man Tale on The Last Jedi and Solo: A Star Wars Story
>The character of luke was fine TLJ. In fact, it was one of the best parts of the movie. Also, Solo: A Star Wars Story was the best Star Wars movie since Return of the Jedi. I really loved it.
Jack Packard, creator of Hey Hey Hee hee(The Pee Pee Song) video
>I'm not a fan of AVGN poop toilet humor

all of this is unironic

Attached: 1545878095316.jpg (1101x755, 190.15K)

Mike sincerely wanted interracial gay sex in TFA.

how shit is your life if you consider Jay a chad

Mike really loved something so he has passion for it. Now he's tired and all his effort is gone, his reviews outside of the first 3 are lazy, which is fine, he can't manufacture care

I have checked their channel a dozen times today.
Where is it. WHERE IS IT.
On Patreon they're already talking about some new Half in The Bag.

Attached: 1575000178049.png (840x900, 868.22K)

this is the cringiest thing available to view online

Rich Evans on the prequels after Phantom Menace
>This new trilogy is going to suck, and it's going to fade away. George Lucas is going to die, sooner or later nobody will care
When you claim this publicly you can see how they are adamant to defend the sequels.

You know nothing. Check the rest of the channel.

Mike is the typical post-war American. Alienated from his ethnic and religious heritage, able only to consume.

The fact that these guys are still posted here amazes me. There's really no avoiding it, I've grown up, and Yas Forums simply remains infancy. Look, RLM are the living embodiment of the smug, detached Gen-X ethos. What do I mean by this?

Well, I'd venture to guess none of them has felt a single sincere conviction about anything since childhood. They exist as polyps upon the colon of culture, satiating themselves on the perceived failures of others (i.e. "The Man") while adding nothing new to the discourse aside from ironic complaint.

They're a group of insecure, lost, rapidly aging burnouts who silently believe they could do a better job of making films than the professionals in the industry. Yet they lack the ambition and ability to actually enter the very industry they're obsessed with. They choose instead to fuck around and make student film piss-takes well into middle age.

They are awful, awful people. I've met thousands just like them, and the last thing we need is for these people to gain any attention for their navel gazing.

Please, Yas Forums, do not aspire to become anything like these people. Theirs is a lonely and pathetic road leading to depression and a life devoid of real purpose.

I hope they disappear and their disaffected followers stop subsidizing their lifestyle. Perhaps that would force them to do something productive with themselves.

Attached: 1578630656324.jpg (1078x618, 129.72K)

Are you under the impression their reviews are ironic? They’re literally just expressing their honest opinions. Are you retarded?

>They're still completely and totally accurate.
Objectively and provably incorrect. He gets the events of the films wrong multiple times.

Lol Mike sounds like he's 7 years old

>durrr he says Anakin doesn’t show up til halfway through the movie when ACSHULLY he shows up 39 minutes into the movie

>It's a Mike pretends to be cooler than the other nerds by hiding behind a jaded, more-cynical-than-thou persona while exclusivly talking about Marvel and Star Trek and entertaining baseless conjecture episode
Oh eait, that's every episode.

Mike Stoklasa has become the very thing he once ridiculed. Look at the Avatar review for instance; he spends 90 minutes going on about Cameron's blatant pandering to the lowest common denominator, marveling (no pun intended) at Cameron's proficiency for manipulating the audience to make them feel how he wants them to feel, how he wants them to think.

Fast forward a couple of years later. Jurassic World is released -- its heavily established to be a soft reboot operating on the hype of faux-nostalgia and Pratt's recent Guardians of the Galaxy success.

Mike loves it. Hits all the right buttons. Really gets his inner manchild going. He basically reveres the film to Jay Bauman's utter disgust.

This is the first sign of Stoklasa's downfall, his immediate descent into the anti-thesis of Mr. Plinkett. He's become lazy, brainwashed, unwittingly indoctrinated into the modern Hollywood machine sculpted by the likes of Disney executives.

It's October 2015. Disney gets in touch with Red Letter Media. They offer him a deal he simply can't refuse; he's instructed to praise Disney's numbered Star Wars episodes while taking critical albeit nonsensical liberties with the standalone films, all the while consistently spewing a casual commitment to every Marvel film that is released. Mike and his goons are heavily compensated for this, successfully turning the likes of the internet's pseuds into DDs (Disney Dudes).

The real enemy isn't Collider, or Loot Crate boxes.

It's Mike Stoklasa.

Attached: 1510084691856.png (768x510, 828.74K)

the older i get, the more i think rich is the best

his whole life is literally built upon bitching about star trek

>just unfortunate that he isn't equally as harsh on the new trilogy.
Theres hundreds of channels that all do that now and got their content out the day after the movies came out. There isnt much more to say that hasn't been said already.

Mike just likes the bright lights and effects because they take him out of the ennuai of his life for two hours. You could dress up in a starfleet uniform, jingle your keys in front of him, and get the same result.

Jurassic World was fun.

>Thoroughly criticise every aspect of the trilogy over several hours
>Hit pieces
With a quick mind like yours I can see why you like the films of George Lucas.

Rich is a high school fedora fag who never grew up I know too many people like him.

Exactly. The difference between Luke's intro and Anakin's is like 15 minutes.

RLM thread #90000

Can somebody explain these obsessive RLM schizo threads to me?

They use sarcasm and irony to convey honest thoughts, which if you're dumb comes off as disingenuous

Boredom.

Rich is way worse than Beard and AIDS combined
>morbidly obese manchild
>always wears comic shirts, but cant answer ANY comic question Jay or Mike have
>has a video game show, but says stupid things like 3D mario games shouldn't have controllable cameras and is blatantly bad at video games in general
>thinks being a cynical, nitpicking autist is the same as intelligence
>flat out didn't understand basic character motivations for Civil War despite being a huge MCU fan
>starts REEEEEEing when chat constantly BTFOs him
>nostalgiafag who only likes shit from his youth
>has an obnoxious "I fucking love science" attitude
>can't pronounce words
>forced catchphrases
>meme laugh
>actual plebbitor
>confused by Yas Forums
>has a tranny fiance
>allows Mike to bully him on a daily basis
>doesn't oppose people being tracked by the government with chip implants
>only ever funny by accident when he fucks up and gets made fun for it, his real sense of humor is "lel so randumb XD" tier
>claps at the end of films
>has never had actual fruit in his life and is convinced he'll hate it because he doesn't like sodas with fruit flavors
When did you realize Rich was actually worse RLM and is the embodiment of amerifat retard?
I'm gonna go ahead and say that I personally think Rich is the worst member of the crew. Even though Beardfat takes things too seriously, he always sounds like he knows what he's talking about and he showed several times that he has technological knowledge and AIDSmoby offers insightful commentary many times. Rich manages to be both an embarassing nerd and seemingly have no real input into the movies they're talking about and is only there because he's Mike's friend. When Mike isn't around to put him down, he acts like an obnoxious prick and the only real value he offers is that he does the grunt work for them (buying merchandise for videos, building props, etc). He's basically their employee and is only in videos because Mike likes him.

Attached: 5bjibgaa2zez.png (887x1236, 1.02M)

You've never seen the prequel trilogy if you think his reviews are effective take downs. He was too low iq to see that the Jedi were supposed to be blind and ossified.
Mike is Yas Forums incarnate. When encountreing anything more thematically complex than Red Bad Blue Good, he goes into shitpost mode just like Yas Forums.
>so you're le saying it was le bad on le purpose?
Mike+Yas Forums

youtube.com/watch?v=OrNBEhzjg8I
Loneliness

Yeah and if you're smart it comes off as cowardly
>hehe if I can hide behind my ironic shield I'll never be in a vulnerable position

Did Rich die?
Why no Picard finale video?

It's still taking a position so what you're saying makes no sense

Never seen this before, it's brilliant. Rich's idea for a Jar Jar punching bag is so obvious I'm surprised Lucas didn't steal it.

It's not surprising that the same people who attack the prequels are always unversed in real film or anything artistic, and that the people who praise the prequels (Zizek, Paglia, Brody, etc) are always literate, educated, and versed in real film.

vice.com/read/camille-paglia-believes-that-revenge-of-the-sith-is-our-generations-greatest-work-of-art
newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/what-the-seven-star-wars-films-reveal-about-george-lucas
youtube.com/watch?v=Ibkmh72_1pw

The fact that everyone points to Plinkett as the authority on why the prequels are bad speaks volumes. Mike Stoklasa is one of the least artistic people on the planet - he can't process movies outside of the conventions of Hollywood films, his approach to narrative is tempered with the same surface-level requisites listed on tvtropes.

Any complaint that people have about the prequels illustrates a weak grasp on film. How many art films would they claim has 'too much sitting and talking'? They would watch the end of Breaking the Waves and whine about dated CGI. Their sensibilities for 'good dialogue' in what is intentionally pulp comes from bad pulp, ie, the original Star Wars, the only pulp they've ever seen. They would similarly view any homage-driven art film and miss the entire point.

Lucas' only mistake in the prequels was doing something daring, original, artistic and literate, not realizing that the manchildren conditioned by the original SW trilogy to loathe anything cerebral would lash out against his cinematic risks.

They are Hollywood plants. Yes they grew up in Wisconsin but they work for Hollywood. Their status as outsiders is fake. RLM is totally dishonest.

>When did you realize Rich was actually worse RLM and is the embodiment of amerifat retard?
After like the first half a dozen episodes of BOTW it was obvious. The comic book stuff is completely obvious if you watch and of the comic based reviews he's in, but he's said multiple times he hasn't read a comic in like 7-10 years at this point.

Mike unironically has more comic book knowledge than Rich