Also why didn't she try to gouge his eyes out?
Why did Landa strangle her if he was going to defect anyway?
Landa was a self-serving psychopath. He obviously didn't love Hitler or really hate jews -- he just liked being a cat who could toy with it's kill. He strangled her for personal satisfaction.
fpbp
Badly written movie
this
For being a dirty lying hoe who thought even for a second that her charade was fooling him. What an insult desu.
Because he was based.
FPBP. He simply was good at performing and orchestrating violence. Much like how Walt White doesn’t give a shit about meth itself but he’s good at making it
Gotta go with these. He didn't have any allegiance to Germany, he was just a master manipulator who liked being able to do whatever he wanted. Kind of like how Jabba the Hutt kept sexy aliens around even though he didn't fuck them.
FEET
Yeah these guys get the picture. He didn't actually care about the war, only how he could serve his own interests. See in that moment he decided to strangle her for the trouble she'd caused, and probably for the sexual thrill. It was more of a power thing than a logic thing. He just did it because he could.
This scene makes me rock fucking solid to this day. Not sure why, though.
Serious case of FPBP here. All four hit the nail on the head.
What a lot of people don't understand is that Landa wasn't loyal to Hitler or Nazism or Germany; he was self-serving. In other words, everything he did was orchestrated to serve himself and his own interests.
See, Landa was a master manipulator. Tarantino clues you in on this by how well he manipulates the other characters. So in essence, he wasn't acting logically by strangling Nic Cage's slampiece from National Treasure, he just did it because he wanted to. You see, it served his own self-interests, which was very in line with his character.
I'll be 100% honest here, when I came into the thread I was ready to give a simple FPBP, but after looking at these replies there are SPQPs (several posts quality posts).
Let me elaborate.
All five of these wildcats honed in on a central theme of the story: that Landa is a self-serving psychopath; like a cat who toys with its kill. He doesn't love Hitler, he doesn't hate jews, he just likes to be a self-serving psychopath with no allegiance to either Hitler or Germany, but conversely no hatred of jews.
Now, here's where things really heat up.
Landa is also good at performing and orchestrating violence. You may think that I'm a fucking film savant for picking up on this shit, but remember that stated the same thing and he's a colossal fucking faggot. So kind of like how Walter White doesn't really care about meth, Landa doesn't really care about killing the jews. There's some subtext that you need to be intelligent to pick up on, but basically Landa is a bad guy in the movie.
Now get this, all of this ties into his self-serving psychopathic and orchestrational tendencies, because these traits are typically associated with bad guys in film.
I'm glad I share a board with a myriad of anons who, just like , are huge cocksucking faggots who feel the need to repeat a point after it's been made. Yes, I'm made.
Oh, by the way, go back and read the first letter of each paragraph. ;^)
Autists
spot on my good sirs.
what people often fail to realize is that Christoph Waltz's character Hans Landa, while being technically a nazi, isn't really a nazi. he is more of a self serving psychopath. he has no allegiance towards the reich, in fact as op pointed out he was going to defect from it.
basically what this intelligent user is trying to convey, but without the try-hard faggotry
>Oh, by the way, go back and read the first letter of each paragraph. ;^)
ilanlnio? I don't get it
Landa was gay right? And the german soldier that was with him and got shot was his lover?
I don't know who you are. I don't know what you want. If you are looking for upvotes, I can tell you I am not a faggot redditor. But what I do have are a very particular set of skills, skills I have acquired over a very long career. Skills that make me a nightmare for people like you. If you stop right now, that'll be the end of it. I will not look for you, I will not pursue you. But if you don't, I will look for you, I will find you, and I will shove my fist so far up your ass that I will use you as a ventriloquist dummy at children’s birthday parties in order to lull them into a false sense of security so that I can rape their parents.
this should be a pasta
I appreciate your support, but it's too specific to this thread to be all that versatile as a copypasta.
I just came in to say, this is a very good thread and I'm all very proud of you
>I just came in to say, this is a very good thread and I'm all very proud of you
weak
>watch as, cornered and lacking in imagination, he makes the same shit joke AGAIN.
Maaaaan, I remember cruisin' Yas Forums (back then we called it "slash b") looking for the freshest memes. Rickrolling, advice animals, rage comics, greentexts... it seemed like the world was our oyster. Like the memes would never stop flowing.
It's all changed now, the meme game. "The Only Game" as my good friend Brad Dunwhittey called it (rip in piece, bro). Memes aren't just something Joe Schmo can take a look at and understand. Memes require an in-depth understanding and appreciation of film to truly "get". Kino, capeshit, waifu-core... it doesn't matter what your taste is, each meme has to be hand-crafted by dedicated artisans to truly deliver that dank experience.
Sometimes I miss those old days...
>weak
>>watch as, cornered and lacking in imagination, he makes the same shit joke AGAIN.
>“When I did ‘Inglourious Basterds,’ and I went to Diane [Kruger], and I said, look, I’ve got to strangle you,” the director said. “If it’s just a guy with his hands on your neck, not putting any kind of pressure and you’re just doing this wiggling death rattle, it looks like a normal movie strangulation. It looks movie-ish. But you’re not going to get the blood vessels bulging, or the eyes filling it with tears, and you’re not going to get the sense of panic that happens when your air is cut off.”
>What I would like to do, with your permission, is just…commit to choking you, with my hands, in a closeup,” Tarantino continued. “We do it for 30 seconds or so, and then I stop. If we need to do it a second time, we will. After that, that’s it. Are you down to committing to it so we can get a really good look. It’ll be twice, and only for this amount of time, and the stunt guy was monitoring the whole thing.”
Do it again, I'm starting to get hard.
The real answer is that Tarantino is a depraved sexual lunatic and wanted an excuse to personally act out one of his salacious fantasies on screen.
>Do it again, I'm starting to get hard.
He's calling you a braindead unoriginal zoomer faggot, user.
Once more, for good luck. I know you've got a whole folder full.
*Autist
It's the same guy
I like Tarantino because his movies are good and because he has the exact same sexual fetishes as me.
>Once more, for good luck. I know you've got a whole folder full.
Nah, don't really like that one, bit obvious. Got anything better?
They even have a clue in the dialogue. Hans Landa purporting in the film's classic opening scene how much he loves the moniker of "Jew Hunter" and using it as a means of intimidation. But then in the later scene with Aldo and Utivich he claims the nickname was something he was saddled with and resents.
Landa is a sadist, but he's an opportunist first and foremost. On top of taking pleasure in the kill simply because he enjoyed the game, he probably also killed Von Hammersmark because he didn't want anything to stand in the way of him making a deal with the Allied forces.
Operation Kino indeed.
All these posts fail to grasp the fact that Christophers character, while technically a Nazi, wasnt really concerned with Hitler or Nazi germany or even defeating them. Like a cat with its prey, he simply enjoyed toying with his kill. I actually have a PHD in psychology and in my professional opion he was a classic self serving psychopath.
Think of it this way - Landa was a conductor, and instead of having an orchestra made up of instruments like a horn section, a strings section and possibly a pianist his instruments were violence.
While technically a Nazi, his magnum opus wasnt the Reich or the SS but toying with his prey, serving his own interests that he orchestrated by kidnapping Brad Pitt or whoever. In the final crescendo, however Brad Pitt proved that sometimes you get served with your own petard, and while in some sense he wasnt a Nazi, just out to prey on his own orchestra, like a cat to the flame he was branded with the swastika, which technically served him right
Ok so following the vein of this thread, I have the same question but about another Tarantino character: why did Dr. King Schultz kill Calvin Candy when they were one step away from leaving Candyland unharmed?
>I just came in to say, this is a very good thread and I'm all very proud of you
I don't know exactly what's going on in this thread but I fucking love it
>the vein of this thread
Was hoping it was going to be a thread for depraved coomers like myself, but we end up with actual movie discussion for once. What the fuck?
He was a dentist and candy bad for teeth lolz :)
How the fuck should I know? I've never seen Django Unchained.
>haha I fucking love it! Just like I FUCKING love SCIENCE, bro! haha lol!
Leave the thread.
boo. you're ruining it
Bro thats ben stillers wife
Because Tarantino wanted to strangle Diane Kruger and wrote the scene from that.
>I don't know exactly what's going on in this thread but I fucking love it
woosh
this movie is so unrealistic in that landa didn't rape her before/after he murdered her
>why did Dr. King Schultz kill Calvin Candy when they were one step away from leaving Candyland unharmed?
Because Schultz literally can' take that his plan didn't go 100% through. The guy fucking loves the smell of his own farts and believes that he is superior to everybody, so the fact that a dumbass like Candie bested him in any way or form was unbereable.
coz he's an evil nazi
Nigger I started it. I'm not OP, but I started that sick chain of meme replies.
Don't like it? Leave.
well said. when you think about it he was less of a human being and more of a cat... a cat who liked to toy with his prey, or a kid who liked to play with his toys.
Schultz was a self-serving psychopath. He obviously didn't love Django or really hate slavers-- he just liked being a cat who could toy with it's kill. He shoot him for personal satisfaction.
>nigger
lolz he said it again :) ;)
Truly, good takes such as these are the reason I come back to Yas Forums
You see folks, it's simple. Landa wasn't really loyal to Hitler, nor did he really hate Jews, he was entirely self-serving, and any action on his part was simply a matter of a display of power, like a cat playing with its prey, like, for example, Bane when he asks CIA what's the point of shooting a man before throwing them out of an airplane?
It is all an elaborate mindgame that he enjoying partaking in, as he is quite sadistic and likes seeing people squirm in his presence.
if you didn't have the grammar of an eight year old, that joke might have landed
Damn, that's some serious trust placed in his hands.
>I'm the one everyone is mocking
Good on you champ.
no but seriously he said the jews are like rats so we might actually be on to something with this cat thing. expand on that
haha literally in his hands!
this thread is pure kino
shit like this is why me and my discord sub will never leave lul
Dare i say he is chaotic neutral?
Good damn
Great answer guys
An incisive take. I never picked up on the rats/cats thing before with the jews.
Keep an eye on this poster, he's going places!
essentially he's less of a man and more of a wolf in human skin - in essence, a cat who likes to toy with his prey
he's lawful evil you schmuck. He wears a uniform and kills people ffs
I copy-pasted the first comment you fucking dumbass nigger
Well informed answer. I am proud of you user
agreed, just shake the guys hand and get the fuck out of there. He paid for the woman's freedom and it was heavily implied throughout the movie that the Shultz was rich and that the $12,000 he spent wouldn't have meant much financially. Senseless to throw his life away like that.
*nods respectfully toward you*
Aye. A fine thread, and well worth the upvote
>can't work out tenses
clearly not, considering your "copy-pasted" comment read like a 4th grader having a stroke while trying to string a sentence together.
>tfw you make the first post in a thread to point out the obvious and when you come back after lunch it's turned into the stupidest fucking thread you've ever seen on Yas Forums
can we just post more strangling scenes please
All this is the same autistic poster.
Calvin Candie was a sadist and all about personal satisfaction - kind of like a cat who toys with its kill. there's no way he'd want to look like a pussy in front of everyone. what he didn't know was that Schultz was the top dog in the room... and his bite was worse than his bark. I guess you could say he really pressed "paws" on the entire plan
Seems like you're the autistic one.
>this thread