What directors does this chart describe?

t. low IQ

Michael Bay

Sam Raimi

Hitchcock

i drew this in 2018

>Nolan
>it doesn't make sense so it sucks!
>It's genius! Bazinga!
>It's shallow sophistry

Attached: iq.jpg (594x415, 21.1K)

Michael Mann

Attached: DSF3i76UIAANCMs.jpg (417x361, 23.77K)

Zack Snyder

Michael Bay to a T

Michael Bay
Zack Snyder

Scorsese

This

No, Kubrick would be a sinusoidal curve where the least enjoyment is ~87 and the highest enjoyment is ~120. pic related

Attached: 1585698383013.png (594x415, 33.33K)

Don Siegel

Unironically Sylvester Stallone.
I've never met an average person that likes his movies, only retards and high IQ.

uwe boll

How about this???

Attached: runner_paradox.png (818x439, 6.47K)

that version goes for all allegedly good modern directors, nolan is just the most egregiously memed

Scorsese. At least his mob movies and the Wolf of Wall Street

fight

This is bait, right?

Few if any examples. High IQ people can enjoy dumb action movies that stupid people love, but usually midwits don't dislike them any more

PAUL VERHOEVEN
THE MIDWIT FILTER

Based

Attached: snyder.jpg (1079x1009, 75.76K)

>PAUL VERHOEVEN
But I thought everyone liked his films?

Christopher McQuarrie

midwits adore dishonest artsy trash and whatever else is memed by other midwits for making them feel smart. both retards and patricians reject these for different reasons

I'm not a fan of Verhoeven personally, but he's probably the best example for the purpose of this since a lot of people write his movies off as violent action flicks

You're correct but that goes more for not-enjoying movies than for enjoying them. The inverse tends to be less of a stark distinction

Maybe on Yas Forums, where we are all high-IQ aesthetes.

fpbp

verhoeven is a high level midwit himself

This

my bad i thought we were talking about the other graph for some reason

Unironically the Adam Sandler kinography "CLICK"

What movies follow this curve?

Attached: Screenshot_20200331-202009.png (1440x2960, 370K)

>implying artistic ability and intelligence are correlated

Never fucking post on Yas Forums again you degenerate phoneposter

>sophistry
I don't think you know what this word means.

fell for the bait lol

>dude just pretending loooool
Come back when you're 18

dude that's not even me wtf lol

Would just be a line with a negative slope

Michael Bay

filtered

Attached: iamyourking.gif (225x162, 465.23K)

Great post

Alfonso Cuaron

Attached: BRAVO SNYDER.png (1920x1080, 1.92M)

Kathryn Bigalow.
Nolan is a good call but I nominate David Fincher
That’s Gasper Noe right there
That’s Lars Von Trier
Clever, took me a minute to realise the axis had changed and I had to throw out my choice
Behind the scenes documentary of any Michael Bay movie

I am prepared to be judged

nah, he's on the inverted curve

based

Attached: solitaire-thief-michael-mann-1981-L-QDg7EZ.png (635x353, 256.09K)

I'd say OP image describes Signs

>implying they're not
the farther a medium is from pure creation (music, visual arts) the more craft and therefore intelligence it requires. movies are pretty far in the craft direction. a lot of moving parts and if any of them suck the whole thing suffers. there are no great idiot savant directors. verhoeven makes good movies but he's not a deep thinker.

Yes

I guess I might agree with you if directors were responsible for every aspect of film production.