The Passion of the Christ (2004)

>Who says this?
Religitards.
t. was raised very Catholic

>Uh, what? How do you even being to justify this? Is it just because he doesn't say a lot of lines? That IS his character.
Nah, he's just underwritten and boring. For a better Jesus performance from the same actor, watch The Thin Red Line.

Mel is a brainlet.

did eli roth direct this shit? yeah we get it jesus had a rough time. but what he went through wasn't the point, it's why he went through it. fuck mel gibson

>I am from Occupied Palestinian Territory

Which is absurd given some of the Pharisees are shown defending Jesus, something not even in the bible. The movie is more anti-roman than anti semetic. Where the Pharisees are reacting to a perceived threat the Romans are just cruel assholes to be cruel assholes

(((they))) want you to think it's bad

Attached: TPOTC.jpg (3000x1250, 2.39M)

I can't be bothered to google, but I think the cinematographer might be jewish.

not only was he making good movies but he was showing a lot of range from his own acting, comedy to drama and action films, really is a shame to think about what could have been

>Catholic
Here's your problem
>underwritten
This word has zero meaning.

This scene is heart wrenching.
youtube.com/watch?v=FQnJ3sifNQQ

low effort
I accept your concession.

Not just Jewish but father to one of the cutest actresses in Hollywood

Attached: 1570763777888.jpg (383x512, 45.92K)

>Bad critic score
>Good audience score
What did they mean by this?

Attached: hmm.png (750x345, 195.63K)

>what he went through wasn't the point
Absolute retard. You don't know anything about this topic.

Attached: Andrea_Mantegna_089.jpg (616x1374, 218.42K)

I'm dead fucking serious. The world has zero meaning. It's a buzzword. There's no such thing as "under-writing."

Attached: 1583940325912.gif (257x200, 1.24M)

Do you not even understand what The Passion is? You shouldn't speak unless you understand the topic, yank.

By chance, are you American?

>nooo why jesus have to get boo-boos... me want cute baby jesus in manger and making water into wine hee hee hee

People be like @ Jesus "how dare you"

Attached: 1584895809473.png (250x250, 69.68K)

>and according to religitards he's a bad guy.

>ask kikes whether they want to murder an innocent man or release a convicted criminal.
>ask them again just to make sure they're serious
>wash your hands of the matter and regret that you won't be around in 37 years when the romans return to btfo jerusalem.

He's based.

This user fucks. There is no meaning to 90% of "critical" vocabulary. It's almost all opinion and envy masquerading as learning and science.

The only bad part is when he rises at the end like superman

It's pretty bad
Stay mad, your fairy tale is a pretty shit story and history is more interesting.

Yeah it had nothing to do with watching a man getting actually tortured to death for 2 hours

i think the after credits where he storms a synagogue with an uzi is kinda over the top, but otherwise entertaining flick

>underwritten
>over directed
These two are easy ways to filter out brainlets from the discussion

For literally no reason. It’s a fantastic film.

>It was unironically jews seething about being depicted as bad as they were.
Which is exactly what I've heard, and isn't even true. Some of the Pharisees defend Jesus. The man who helps Jesus bear the cross is called a "Jew" in a derogatory fashion before he rises to defend Jesus.
The movie is more anti-Roman than anti-Semitic.

I too think the building of the romance in Attack of The Clones is given the time and attention it deserves in the script.

Jesus Christ is history. Any historian of any worth whatsoever will tell you the same.

>mobie bad becos is fairy tail
This coming from the same slack jawed faggot that loves the Avengers. Go kill yourself and burn in hell you degenerate piece of filth.

Yes goy, Jesus rising from the dead it literally history.

This broke my fucking heart.

Why does Passion get snubbed and slammed while trash like Last Temptation gets praised?

Attached: The Last Temptation Of Christ (1988) - 1.webm (1000x543, 2.86M)

hello jew

>your orders were to punish this man, not scourge him to death

If the writing is bad, it's bad. If the writing is good, it's good. Don't try to make your opinions seem more objective by adding meaningless prefixes to them.

Hey buddy I hate our hook-nosed friends as much as the next user but this movie ain't anti-jew

The actual man known as Jesus Christ existed, that isn't really up for debate and is universally accepted as historical fact by all but the most edgy of atheists. His divinity is all that can be debated. Also, the jews hate Jesus more than literally anything in the entire history of the universe. Why the fuck would they be out there trying to convince people that Jesus rose from the dead, when that would invalidate their entire religion, you retard?

based trips

this guy enjoys transformers

>the jews are suppressing proof that death immunity is a documented fact
based

You are an anti intellectual, as expected from a religitard.

Are you mentally disabled? I'm genuinely asking. I haven't seen illiteracy like this since the last time I talked to an American.

>nails through the hands
never happened

last temptation is kino doe

Americans love Passion tho

Americans are also illiterate retards, which is the relevant part when I'm talking to an illiterate retard.

I'm curious, was that not standard roman practice?

you assume too much

I don't need to assume you're an illiterate retard. I can see it.

Why is language so neglected in movies? Passion of the Christ, Apocalypto, The Witch and the Lighthouse are pure linguistic kino. Instead of this, we get a million movies where romans have british accents and americans faking a terrible german accent while cosplaying as nazis. Embarrasing.

He's literally making it up. There's only one actual piece of crucifixion evidence and it's a heel.

too difficult for mainstream audiences. Don't underestimate how dumb other people are

palm flesh and bones can't support a man's body weight
the nail would have been driven through the wrists

people have experimented on cadavers, retard and there's also historical evidence that roman soldiers were told to drive the nail through the wrist

The Roman soldiers in this movie are comically sadistic

Because people more than often just make films to make money, not to artistically express and portray a time period truthfully.

rude af niqqa

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crucifixion#Nail_placement
There's a section where it discusses it

Because it hurts sales. People like seeing people talk like they talk

>palm flesh and bones can't support a man's body weight
Pretty sure Jesus had a more molecularly dense body than normal people. He could also alter his mass according to the walking on water story.

Except there isn't. And the palm wasn't what supported the body's weight either, retard. It was the heel nails that supported the body's weight. This is a commonly spouted myth by retards. Not to mention that crucifixions didn't have a standard. Seneca talks about how they would sometimes nail the person's dick to the wood or crucify them upside down and some stretched the arms and some didn't. You're parroting myths you read on reddit.

from here >In 1968, archaeologists discovered at Giv'at ha-Mivtar in northeast Jerusalem the remains of one Jehohanan, who had been crucified in the 1st century. The remains included a heel bone with a nail driven through it from the side. The tip of the nail was bent, perhaps because of striking a knot in the upright beam, which prevented it being extracted from the foot. A first inaccurate account of the length of the nail led some to believe that it had been driven through both heels, suggesting that the man had been placed in a sort of sidesaddle position, but the true length of the nail, 11.5 cm (4.53 inches), suggests instead that in this case of crucifixion the heels were nailed to opposite sides of the upright.[43][44][45] The skeleton from Giv'at ha-Mivtar is currently the only recovered example of ancient crucifixion in the archaeological record.[46]

based /x/ crossposter

Says literally nothing about the hands.

So he was like Vision in the MCU? Was Jesus also powered by an Infinity Stone?

>It was the heel nails that supported the body's weight
Except when the victim would invariably lift themselves up just to breathe. That would've ripped their hands from the cross.

>Not to mention that crucifixions didn't have a standard.
That's true, Jesus could've just been nailed to a simple stake instead of a cross for all we know

Can smell that you're a yank.

We see him in flash backs being a human being. Joking with his mother, doing his sermons. And you see him take an absurd amount of punishment yet he just takes it. And then that moment of silence just as he’s about to die. Its been years, but the movie is well acted.

Ignore all the gaytheists, fagnostics and kikes in this thread. The Passion of the Christ is the greatest film ever made in the history of cinema.

The reason they do not appreciate this film is the same reason they do not appreciate the Bible. For a non-believer the whole meaning of the story is completely lost on them. But for a believer, when you're watching the man who was savaged, beaten and crucified so that you could be delivered from your transgressions against God, it has an entirely new meaning and really brings into perspective the sacrifice that our saviour made for us.

LONG LIVE OUR KING WHOSE NAME IS CHRIST JESUS

Attached: 1584189529905.jpg (538x640, 49.94K)

It's okay but honestly I feel it is a bit overrated, if anything. Gore aside, most of the time it has a made for tv feel to it.

My parents church organized the entire congregation to watch it opening day. Apparently this was pretty common, I was just 7 so I barely remember it.

Long live king of the Jews

>So he was like Vision in the MCU? Was Jesus also powered by an Infinity Stone?
Well God and Jesus are typically associated with the color white, and white through a prism is the colors of the infinity stones, so The Avengers universe is sort of a God-is-dead commentary, with Thanos being the advocate of religion.

I assume from the article they just tied the hands or something

I doubt the dick could support one's entire body weight.

Not him but underwritten is a specific complaint of bad writing. Just leaving it at bad writing is oversimplification, as there can be many reasons why something is considered poorly written.

Underwritten means that an aspect of plot/characterization that is supposed to be important (as judged from context) is not given enough time, development, or care relative to its importance.

Thank you daddy Thanos

Why would you do that when it says literally nothing about hands?

BTW: The sequel "Resurrection" is announced for 2021.

Long live Jesus Christ our Lord.

based Atheist poster

Attached: Yes.jpg (643x605, 61.45K)

I'm not a big fan of fantasy desu

Why is every sequel named either Resurrection, Redemption, Resurgence etc?????