You contrarian cunts told me this was trash

you contrarian cunts told me this was trash

why the fuck do you hate everything it's actually really good

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 100.12K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=RtBC0ief_Co
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Name?

Eisenberg and Poots do a lot of movies together?

It's not remotely good you stupid fucking lazy nigger

Vivarium, torrent was recently uploaded

I really don't understand why you think that. I mean even if it's not your taste, what the fuck is so bad about it? I've been honestly wondering and read some bad reviews on RT, and apparently most people don't like that there was no big conclusion to the mistery. But that's exactly what I liked. I thought it would just be another case of good buildup, poor and disappointing answer, but instead it just keeps a lot of stuff open and just has certain hints.

Nah it's literal garbage. to save anons the time:

>opening credits are of a cuckoo being raised by another bird and killing the bird's chicks
>qt imogen poots and hideous jew eisenberg go for a viewing of a suburban house with an eccentric estate agent
>he leaves them there and they are the only people on the estate which they can't leave because it folds back in on itself
>they are spontaneously given a boy to raise (cuckoo, geddit?!)
>they raise the boy who ends up killing them both when he grows into an adult
>the boy replaces the agent who showed them round the house

that's it. oh and it's got the most hideous cheap CGI imaginable in nearly every scene. It's a garbage 2/10 film and would struggle to fill a 40 minute twilight zone episode

Still don't see the problem. Who gives a shit about bad CGI.

dude just admit you have shit taste and watch more movies. the film was forgettable garbage that was way too long for what it was

You're retarded. Your only arguments so far were bad CGI and that you understood the underlying theme. But keep educating me on movies, go on

I'm not retarded. It was a boring paper-thin film with eyesore aesthetics and an awful shitty actor who only lands roles because he's a jew. It could have been condensed into a 40 minute twilight zone episode and nothing of value would have been lost. The ONE scene that intrigued me was when Poots followed the boy under the curb but in the end it led to nothing

Thanks, really appreciate that.

Slimy pathetic loser

lmao what's with all the hook nosed yids on Yas Forums today?

>no big conclusion to the mistery
kek

There didn't need to be a conclusion, but a small look behind the curtain would have helped.
Weirdly the only film I haven't hated Eisenberg in... Just sat there wondering why the don't kill the fucking kid? They know it's not theirs, they're stuck in this weird out of reality suburb, killing the kid isn't going to carry moral consequences.
Why did they age so badly? Bad makeup??? Eisenberg could have dug more hole in a life. Eisenberg did a shit hole, should have ramped the sides. Ultimately, little emotional involvement with the characters and no real reason to give a fuck about the movie.
Sub-par.

I love all of those, except Jeepers Creepers. And I honestly think this is better than Identity. Haven't seen the other two I think.

I'm here to find out what people seem to hate so much about it. So far I'm still wondering.

you can guess the end of the movie right from the start when they receive the baby. the movie starts off interesting but plateaus really hard really fast. you are basically waiting for a twist that never comes. it sounds cool on paper but the execution left much to be desired towards the end, it was really uninspired. couldn't really focus on the acting because they didn't interact as much.

I hated the film but they didn't kill the kid because they were told they would be released if they raised him, and if they had killed him they probably surmised they would have been given another one to raise. the way they acted was semi-logical, it's still a shit film though

try this also user

Attached: the-signal.jpg (650x650, 106.53K)

>Why did they age so badly? Bad makeup??? Eisenberg could have dug more hole in a life

They didn't age because they were only there for about a year you retard. If you would have paid attention you would have noticed that when the child was suddenly a small boy the marks on the door said 90 days or something. That was one of the unsettling things about it.

>So far I'm still wondering.
it was really dull and kept treading over the same ground.
>omg we are stuck here
>omg lets try to find a way out
>omg the little boy is so weird
over and over over and over till the end
really not interesting at all

>implying you don't enjoy having a hooked nosey burrowing itself up your asshole

This film is great, very underrated

>they didn't kill the kid because they were told they would be released if they raised him

Nobody said that. Eisenberg wanted to kill it, Poots didn't want to because she still saw it as a child. She was an elementary teacher, you know. They wrote it like that for a pretty obvious reason.

And when she figured out how to get the child to give her any useful information and it transformed like that, she was completely freaked out and simply scared shitless so she didn't try anything. She literally says it in the next fucking scene you idiot, that she is scared of it.

At least now I know why you people didn't like the movie, you haven't even watched it.

>p*l sp eds
the lowest form of human life

In all fairness, I did lose attention after the first half hour. They both looked like something had happened to them as they died, I thought it was bad aging.

I still would have hit the child with the shovel after it did the bubbly neck thing. Why raise an autistic child?

Thanks for the recommendation.

>Why raise an autistic child?

They didn't raise it. it was there, and forced her to give it food. Her maternal instincts and love for children made her protect the kid from Eisenberg. When the bubbly neck thing happened, she was understandably scared.

>unsettling
Lol. Maybe if you are a pussy.

Shouldn't you be busy spamming Hereditary threads, telling everyone that you couldn't stop laughing throughout the whole movie?

>hereditary
That was the little kid learns not to stick head out of the window flick?

I'd argue that feeding and teaching a child are pretty much raising... They might not have gotten far along that (as the kid changed), but she definitely fucked up not letting Eisenberg twat it with the shovel.

this and vivarium are the ultimate abducted[ kino

Pretty much this. Okay premise that wasn't sufficiently built upon, undermined partially by mediocre acting.

Yea it's a bit stretched out and Eisenberg automatically downgrades everything he's in, but the film still holds up really well. I'm glad the director didn't spell out everything. He managed to create a real sterile atmosphere that fits perfectly with the theme. And that final sequence was legit spooky

Attached: Untitled.jpg (1445x797, 136.62K)

hopy fucken shit poots looks exactly like jude law in that cap

Attached: 006THD_Jude_Law_054.jpg (852x480, 75.06K)

still a bit surprised that the most beautiful woman in the world is British

>I'm glad the director didn't spell out everything.
lmao, what was there to piece together? the movie is bland and obvious.

First competent post so far. Thank you

Then tell me, who brought them there? Who was the boy meeting? Who wrote the book? How does all of it looping make sense? And like a thousand other things that were literally not spelled out.

It's total fucking garbage.

>who brought them there?
the 'agent', didn't you watch the movie?
>Who was the boy meeting?
an offspring of a cuckoo-type of interdimensional species
>Who wrote the book?
the cuckoo dudes
>How does all of it looping make sense?
that's how the species propagate, same as the fucking birds

ask me how do I know you're an american

Somebody pls shoop her face into the young pope's face and title it The Young Poots
I can't into shoop

>the 'agent', didn't you watch the movie?
that's not what I mean, who was behind the whole shit. you are describing what you saw, well done. but you still don't know shit about what was behind it, because it wasn't spelled out

its literally a "dude aliens lmao" movie. a lot of it won't even make sense based on science but you can 'guess' a lot based on what you saw. you can't really know what was purposed behind all of that besides the survival of the species. the trippy imagery at the end is just there to not make you feel like you wasted your time watching the movie, but it also provides no payoff, as you already expected a lot of people went through the same experience. it becomes kinda pointless when the boy starts watching tv all the time and leaving the hose to talk to aliens and learn more. why were they there in the first place if they had no influence on the kid.

>why were they there in the first place if they had no influence on the kid
So he can learn to mimic human behavior

Right, that's why the first realtor guy had different mannerisms, inherited from his human "parents".

it would be a lot easier to just have a TV to watch normal human television. the 'guy' behaves like and turbo autist at the end either way

which is another thing that's not spelled out, what's up with the TV.

thanks for saving my time instead of believing faggot OP

back to redd.it then

So what’s the “message” of the movie? The suburbs suck, just be rich lol

I liked it, fag. Excellent anti-immigration movie.

How is it anti-immigration?

>So what’s the “message” of the movie? The suburbs suck, just be rich lol
I don't think there is one really. Simply a creepy story about a parasitical alien system

European movie that features a (((white))) couple being tricked into raising an alien.

It's barely "ok"

my guess was that they probably see normal images or text through those QRcode like symbols

the downfall of a happy couple by an unwanted child, shackled in their house by their monetary situation. they hate the kid and that causes fights between them. the dad leaves the house everyday and burries himself in more and more work to avoid going home. the mother hates the kid but can't help but feel sorry for him. the kid them grows up to continue spreading that same hate on the world. but of course not lmao, this shit movie sucks

Attached: yotsuba_disturbed.png (355x541, 179.05K)

You need to take a break from pol unironically

Shining is the story of a hotel full of Jewish ghosts driving a white man insane with work and forcing him to try to kill his family

These people are completely unable to see anything without their Yas Forums glasses

That board is living in your head, not mine.

But Jack was already a degenerate alcoholic prior to getting a job at the Overlook. Yas Forums hates degenerates (despite being internet addicts of course)

>nobody mentions Yas Forums
>schizo commie goes stright to Yas Forums
just so you know, Yas Forums accounts for circa 60% of the entire bhutanese glacial fishing anime forum's traffic

being a Yas Forums regular is among the most degenerate traits possible, including and especially Yas Forums

>SQUAWK Yas Forums SQUAWK Yas Forums

You're worse than they ever were.

You'll never pass

Why do jews hate the suburbs so much? Literally every criticism they levelled at the suburbs could be applied to any other type of household dwelling, the only difference is that suburbs tend to be white and free from crime/niggers

It was just another piece of anti-white, anti-family propaganda

>apparently most people don't like that there was no big conclusion to the mistery. But that's exactly what I liked
I bet you're a huge TLJ fan.

>Get off pol
>NO U