Ay Tone

Ay Tone

Attached: IMG_2071.png (884x810, 841.84K)

Other urls found in this thread:

hdot.org/debunking-denial/ab4-civilian-ovens-comparison/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Attached: 1513141370260.jpg (326x255, 12.48K)

Haha user, what are you talking about. Who needs to worry about such crazy thoughts. Let’s all just go to sleep haha.

lel

schizo user is back.

To keep this Yas Forums I suggest you watch Mr. Death: The Rise and Fall of Fred A. Leuchter, Jr.

> This is contradicted not only by statements from former prisoners and Auschwitz commandant himself. The basic German document on crematorium throughput, prepared by the Central Construction Board in Auschwitz on June 28, 1943, states that the five crematoria in the Auschwitz and Birkenau camps, together, can burn 4,756 corpses in a 24-hour period. This document indicates that the Birkenau crematoria could burn 1.6 million bodies per year.

I'm not a denier or anything but how hot would a furnace have to be to burn three bodies a minute?

correction how hot would it have to be to burn 1.6 bodies a minute?

>This is contradicted by people who said they seen it
not really that reliable though, is it.

>This document indicates that the Birkenau crematoria could burn 1.6 million bodies per year.

Damn, it's a shame that this technology was lost after the war and we can now only burn bodies at 1/100th of that rate. Those Nazis really were advanced...

maybe they just had lots of them

what if you just pack 200 ppl in a room for 40 minutes and the clean up for 20, 24 times a day

and that tech was lost in time...

Attached: 1480437998291.jpg (1080x1350, 117.63K)

>4,756 corpses in a 24-hour period
Im-fucking-possible

its sad that the technology was lost in WW2. Italy could really use it right now

not with advanced nazi tech. humankind was thrown back a few decades after ww2.

you wouldn't be able to get anywhere NEAR those ovens at that temperature required to do what they do in order to clean up to fit more bodies in also that would require a lot of labor wouldn't it?

its not advanced tech. Its just how hot you burn the ovens. "domestic" crematoria are not the same as "industrial" ones.

I tell you the Italians could learn a thing or two from these "nazi" guys.

>also that would require a lot of labor
yeah, were would they possible get cheap labor from?

They cremated themselves, innit.

have you ever stood next to a hot oven for 8 hours? shit gets exhausting even in peak form not multiply that heat by 10 and have trucks worth of material be coming in every hour. I dunno I think the nazis did do something evil but this shit just gets weirder to think about the more you're told to

>starting to doubt the holocaust

Attached: sweat.png (646x595, 280.01K)

its like that old looney tunes gag where daffy has to prepare himself, just multiplied by 6 million

>shit gets exhausting
somebody think of the death camp prisoner workers' rights!

>im a brainlet
>therefore the holocaust is fictional.

This , why would they waste all that Labor and resources on burning the Jews when they had a war to win ?
If anything they should've use the Jewish bodies as food supply.

Respectfully burning bodies one at a time until fully broken down isn't the same thing as tossing multiple corpses in at once.

if we can get this technology we can ramp up production from 10 bodies a day to 10,000!

Why did they attack the Soviet Union when they werent prepared. Im begininng to think the whole ww2 was made up

I didn't say I don't believe the nazis attempted to eradicate the jews I'm just saying that the more you think about the disposal the more the number gets weirder to defend

uh...who said anything about auschwitz?

Uh guys an adult jew would weigh less than 100lbs because they were so malnourished. A lot less time to burn a body when theres not much to burn.

yes. I imagine we could. If we ever wanted to mass dispose of bodies in such a way that the ashes mix. Generally cremations are part of funerals though.


Why so? Why do you dount the opinion of historians over some random on the internet? Do you think aliens built the pyramids, or egyptians? The numbers dead at the camps have been revised a few times, so its not like this is scripture.

did reddit just unknowlingly provided some of the best holohoax evidence arround?

Cite a paper that shows that you can burn that many bodies

you can read all these sources here if you like. Listed at the bottom

hdot.org/debunking-denial/ab4-civilian-ovens-comparison/

Nazis have anicent alien oven technology.

Yeah because funeral home crematoriums specialize in volume destruction of randomized remains instead of burning bodies one at a time as part of a supposedly respectful service for the surviving family.

Sounds like you'd need a lot of fuel for that... in times of war with extreme fuel shortage. Quite the feat.

how hot do those ovens have to be to do that though? A modern Crematorium has to be between 1400 to 1800 in order to burn bodies in the hour it takes, even if you're not respecting the dead the amount of mass you're burning is far greater than one prepared body. why does the paper gloss over that number?

If you think about it logically the nazis should've just taken them to a bottomless pit and started pushing people in. It saves money in the long run and you don't even have to worry about hiding the evidence.

Why not just burry the bodies ? Why waste resources ? Fuel is for planes and Tanks !

The nazis didnt have sophisticated industrial crematoria. They were just makeshift brick holes to dispose of the people who had died from Typhus to stop the spread of infection. The Typhus they used Zyklon B for. Do you believe that a chemical made to kill fleas would instantly kill you too?
Do you believe the nazis shrunk heads and used jewish skin to make lampshades as well?

Attached: images.jpeg-26.jpg (622x493, 49.94K)

Workers already weakened will simply collapse no matter how much you whip them. I can tell you've never worked a physically demanding job. That's why they canned the theory that the pyramids in Egypt were build by slave labour, btw. You need a well fed, motivated work force for stuff like that. If you have to use slave labour, most of the workforce has to be at least well fed and strong.

I don't tkink like doing this today. Sorry I'm not gonna see getting you btfo again.

it doesnt need to be that much hotter. You just dont let it cool down.

cremating is generally more efficent that burial.


>Do you believe the nazis shrunk heads and used jewish skin to make lampshades as well?
no, I obviously dont. Not has any historian since the 50's at least.

>The nazis didnt have sophisticated industrial crematoria. They were just makeshift brick holes to dispose of the people who had died from Typhus to stop the spread of infection
This is false. The ovens were designed by Topf & Sons.

has anyone been able to explain this coincidence?

Attached: 67586857.jpg (990x1278, 324.27K)

>Cremating is more efficient than burial
Doubt it , but you know what's more efficient than both ? Throwing the bodies in a field and letting them rot , why didn't the Nazis do this ?

I dont understand what you think this image proves. 6 million was the estimated jewish population of the russian empire.

>why didn't the Nazis do this ?
I'm afriad I couldnt tell you. I imagine mostly to do with disease. They also tended to dispose of bodies after a battle.

I think you meant billion.

>hdot.org/debunking-denial/ab4-civilian-ovens-comparison/

>. The time required for cremation also depended on the number of bodies in each retort, but on average it took twenty minutes.”[8]

20 minutes for multiple bodies in the same crematorium? When you should know fully well that for each additional body, it would take longer to burn because of heat distribution? Similar to 1 turkey in the oven would take less time to cook than 3 turkeys in the same oven. Nevermind that it would NOT take 20 minutes to turn the body into ashes. It would take far longer. You say "but it's an industrial one!", but that makes no difference. The only difference would be that there would be no need for things like coffins and preperation/cleanup. That says NOTHING about how long the body would take to burn to ashes, which is factually longer than 20 minutes.

Are you able to think for yourself, even a little bit?

Is this the episode where Yas Forums tries to be really dishonest by arguing that cremating all 6 million was impossible and therefore no jew died?

are you capable of reading?

>The time required for cremation also depended on the number of bodies in each retort

20 mins was the average for the average payload.

I dunno about the rest of them but the time constraints for the amount needed to burn are a factor. I don't doubt that jews died in concentration camps in human testing intentional killings and just plain old neglect but that number seems high to burn that quickly

Attached: 1517661538664.jpg (1500x4008, 2.48M)

>Yeah bro, eye witness accounts are known to be the best historical sources.

>20 mins was the average for the average payload.

Can YOU read? Average payload was MORE than 1. Infact, he says the average payload was fucking 4-5 people. Burned into 20 minutes. Give me a goddamn break man.

>"Generally speaking, we burned four or five bodies at a time in one muffle, but sometimes we charged a greater number of bodies"

Is this the episode where /lgbt/ tries to be really dishonest by arguing that anyone who doesn't believe 6 millions jews were killed during WW2 means they think no jews died?

So how big is the payload ? You will need 60 bodies per cremation to get to 6 million and those ovens would have to be working 24/7 for 4 years with no hiccup and not to mention that th burning supposedly only began one year into the war.

Why do you blindly believe every propaganda fable about WWII when the evidence is contradictory?

ah those sneaky jews who are somehow invented the holocaust while making such an obvious mistake as repeatedly using a single number for 45 years.

>6 million in Russia (supposedly half the world's Jewish population)
>All threatened with a 'holocaust' from Russia for years
>Then turns into 6 million European Jews facing starvation and poverty after WW1
>Then turns into 6 million European Jews threatened with 'holocaust' under Hitler
>Russia wins WW2
>Finds that their dead enemy holocausted exactly 6 million Jews
this isn't peculiar?

do you guys really think that gargamel was a nazi?

>Eye witness accounts
You ever read any of these accounts? Some of them make it sound like Auschwitz was a game of Roller Coaster tycoon that got out of hand.

That's even more suspicious though

sorry, I think I misundertood you point.

Werent you complaining about the heat distribution not being taken into account? When clearly it was?

no, not really. Its the same six million for the the first 3, then a different six million later. The russian jewish population were not all killed afterall. a significant portion of those killed in the holocuast were german, or czechslovak.

Kek. Are they undercover posters or are then genuinely unintntionally contributing to holocaust-denial legitimacy?