This actress is so ugly it harms the movie

the movie is already fucking awful, but i couldn't get over her appearance. they do ugly her up a bit for story purposes, but there are a number of scenes where she is dolled up and still is a 2/10. like offensively ugly
she is supposed to be the wife of some multimillionaire tech entrepreneur
there are other things in this movie that require you to suspend disbelief, such as the african american single father guy, but this takes the cake
a cloaking suit is actually the most believable thing in this movie

worst one i've seen in a very long time

Attached: maxresdefault (2).jpg (1280x720, 179.95K)

no, the movie is garbage because it spends too much time on her and to little on him. this is fact

Attached: images.jpg (318x159, 7.09K)

well, yeah. i mean it's just garbage all around
but i was actually distracted by how ugly she is

i honestly looked it up because i figured she must be some bigwigs daughter or something
imagine waking up next to this with her morning breath and she rolls over and just farts under the blanket and says eeeuuuuugh honey can you make me breakfast

Attached: ec71d9ae4c85194d3afbfe9e72ffcbf3.png (618x412, 161.23K)

She is a character in Mad Men and also Handmaid’s Tale. They literally cast her for her ugliness because they want her to be “empowering” rather than sexualized.

Damn that's rough. I don't like to say this or that is ugly because it's highly subjective but she repulses me for some reason.

Puke

If you actually paid attention to the movie, they mention how he's insanely attatched to her because she's the only woman that's ever turned him down and he had to work to get her, while all the other thots threw themselves at him with no effort on his part. He is a true cunnysseur who understands the hunt is what makes it all worthwhile.

She’s a pretty good actress.

plotwise i didn't mind it because i can accept the idea that the guy was mad and wanted her solely for an act of control.

that said i don't like looking at her and i haven't since mad men. she's not even hideously ugly, i just dislike looking at her

Maybe she was cast because she's a good actress. Scientologists trained her from a young age. You may not like her looks but there's no denying she's a good actress.

There's even a joke during job interview scene. Architect guy calls her beautiful, lol.

i do not mind a chick with some ugly features. my girlfriend has horrendous elbows that bend backwards because she broke her arms as a kid in a third world country, and if she ever has to put weight on them, they literally snap backwards at the joint because they weren't set correctly. it's horrifying the first time you see it.
this woman just looks abominable
how the fuck am i expected to pay attention to the movie when i was about to close videolan because the only thing that matches her overall nasty appearance is the way they portray this magical n-word guy. i mean i was done after like ten minutes. i would prefer the rona to having to watch shit like this
the other movie i downloaded that seriously sucked major dick was "a quiet place" because it's so stupid and uses legitimate jump scares that just make me want to rip somebodys throat out

That still stupid. If a bunch of 6/10 or 7/10 threw themselves at me, and I missed the hunt, I still wouldn't go for the one 1/10 ugo who doesn't want my dick. That makes no sense.

Meh, I'd still tap that.

my uncle, who is a certified drunk and walks around naked in his yard and in his house, said to always run a batch before paying for porn
he was right. your mind is warped because you have too much jizm built up in your balls. she is absolutely terrible. for a white chick who isn't obese and without obvious deformities, she is just about as ugly as you can get

Imagine being the invisible man in that scene and having to be all like "damn, Elisabeth Moss character, you fuckin' fine, all sexy with your fat body and horrific protruding chin. I would totally stalk you, both the normal and the invisible me." when all he really wants to do is sneaking into 16 yearold girl's dressing room. Like seriously imagine having to be that invisible man and not only have to sneak into her bathroom while Elizabeth Moss character flaunts her disgusting body in front of you, the fat rolls barely concealing her stretchmarks and saggy skin, and just sneak behind her, step after step, hour after hour, while she perfects that sobbing goblino face. Not only having to tolerate her monstrous fucking square jaw but her haughty attitude as everyone one around her tells her she's THE SINGLE MOST OPPRESSED WOMAN and DAMN, THIS GIRL HAS A LITERAL BILLIONAIRE OBSESSED OVER HER because they're not the ones who have to stand there and watch her fat fucking michelin ass release disgusting diarrhea and blood in the restroom you didn't even know existed before that day. You've been fucking nothing but a healthy diet of schoolgirls and supermodels and later dead-eyed naive country girls for your ENTIRE CAREER coming straight out of the gated community of upper middle class WASP. You've never even smell anything this fucking disgusting before, and now you swear you can taste the sweat that's breaking out on her dimpled forehead as she looks at your direction, smugly assured that you are enjoying the opportunity to stand there and revel in her "rubenesque (for that is what she calls herself)" beauty, the beauty she worked for so hard eating pizza in the previous months. And then the misandrists come and you swear you could kill every single person in this room before you become visible, but you stand there and endure, because you're a fucking invisible man. You're not going to lose your invisibility because of this. Just bear it. Hide your body and bear it.

i was actually taken back by how shit that movie was.
not to mention that the big twist of the movie isnt a twist at all.

she's not hollywood hot but she's irl hot, you all just spend too much time here only looking at women through the media

You simps are the reason pussies have such inflated value atm.

Attached: 1322261862001.png (159x200, 2.17K)

Same. Why the fuck did they cast her? It literally ruined the movie for me

This was the only time she was appropriately casted

Attached: 700B1110-49D0-4B2D-8A2C-452424A16EF2.jpg (1117x689, 173.81K)

>durr im using the latest buzzword therefore i'm right

11/10

t. simp

Attached: Dayg3pdbNYqeAQHAeexFs02xcLgw6IHSb4LmMJVX8NQ.jpg (994x745, 166.49K)

Scientology. Tom Cruise is her friend. I'm not joking. He probably hooked her up into this universal monster series they planned.

Attached: Tom-Cruise-Elisabeth-Moss.jpg (1256x1064, 136K)

This 100%. They completely miss the point of the invisible man and what makes him scary, as does basically every IM movie aside from the first one. He's not scary because OMG he can RAPE! He's scary because he has completely given up on his humanity and views the entire human race as toys for his amusement. He wouldn't rape because he wants to fuck some broad, he would rape because he was bored and it might be a temporary diversion. His entire goal in the movie was to show everyone how much better he was than them and how small they were in compared to him, how they were nothing in his eyes. Yet every remake misses the entire point.

I'm not scared of some dude who is invisible since I know it can't happen irl, but I am scared of people who no longer view others' lives as having value. The former cannot happen (at least, not with current tech) but the latter can, that's what leads to sociopaths and serial killers. That philosophy is why the invisible man is interesting, not whatever bullshit they are trying to push with this shitty movie.

She'll never fuck you incel

t.speedwatcher
it's explained that the guy is insane
that's why he's attracted to her

She was good in Madmen but everything she's been in since is just woke shit. I guess once she gained enough clout to actually choose her projects she revealed her true colors. Makes sense since she's a scientologist.

Have you seen it?

She was ok in mad men but be honest she wouldn't get the role if she wasn't a plain jane.

Yeah, on the 1st day. The only scene that somehow feels like is when he points gun, jokingly saying "BANG!" and puts it way only to rapidly turn around and kill the cop anyway. This is the only trait of invisible man's legacy in it.

No, but I've read the summary and it's retarded. I want Claude Rains hamming it up as he talks about power, not some dude fascinated with his ex. Dude isn't even insane, just an asshole murderer so what's the fucking point?

So the movie's bad because it doesn't fit your idea of how an "invisible man" should act. K.

>buzz buzz
who?

>invisible man
what the fuck. how did you absolute faggots reach that consensus? it was good. she was really good. only poor actor was the black guy but that just may be how he really talks

Same simp.

Attached: 1567687771767.webm (640x358, 1.91M)

Not my idea. Misses the point of.
1. The original movie
2. The novel
3. The image of the character
It's not 'my' idea. When you get rid of what defined the character, then it's bad. I don't even mind the fact the movie feels so fucking cheap, like students' project cheap.

they're contrarians. Also they're simps who rate the quality of a movie based on how sexy the lead actress is.

Yeah, that never happens in real life. Why would a rich and powerful man who could have his pick of the litter, choose to fuck and breed a woman so ugly? It's just too unrealistic.

Attached: unnamed.jpg (512x384, 86.33K)

>She is a character in Mad Men and also Handmaid’s Tale. They literally cast her for her ugliness because they want her to be “empowering” rather than sexualized.
No, she's cast because she's ugly and thus non-threatening to women so they can safely self insert as her being a fucktoy for the rich and powerful, a handmaids tale is literally just twilight for middle class liberal women hitting the wall

I bet you think Dracula Untold is an appropriate use of the character as well, don't you. If you are going to use an iconic character for your movie then be at least somewhat respectful to the source material. If you don't then you are just using the brand for name recognition and to lure gullible saps in to see your shit movie.

I wouldn't mind a movie about an invisible killer stalking his ex, hell that's an interesting premise for a movie. I also appreciate Hollow Man because it didn't just ride on the coattails of the original (much better) movie. But if you are going to make a movie about the invisible man you had better respect his character instead of just doing whatever you want and using the title as name recognition.

Attached: Dracula Untold.jpg (1920x1080, 242.57K)

It's incredibly funny to me that in all the movies that she's in she's lauded as some 10/10 all chads lust for.

>rape
uh
>he has completely given up on his humanity and views the entire human race as toys for his amusement
yes this is him

>Dude isn't even insane
so are all the people in here who hate this movie just not seen it? he is insane. he uses people like toys. he doesnt rape.

fuck Yas Forums is being really fucking stupid over this one. this isnt the kind of movie Yas Forums shits on and if you retards would watch it you would see that youre tard raging over your own imagination

do you think he loved her, or was it just opportunistic? maybe even she seduced him?

>nooo muh invisible man mythology!
cry more nerd

>i honestly looked it up because i figured she must be some bigwigs daughter or something
she's a scientologist which is a next best thing if you want to make it in hollywood

y'all gay

Attached: 3d60244c9bb292b11bb24badcd7f83b8.jpg (634x901, 93.45K)

cute!

I think he did it because he could. Because when you're rich enough, famous enough and powerful enough and you CAN get any good looking bitch you want with the snap of your fingers. Thus looks lose their value.

I have never seen that movie, but if I did, I would judge it based on the movie. Not on its accuracy to lore from decades ago, that there's no obligation to care about.
Yas Forums is just fickle. In another thread they were posting lewd Moss and discussing how she was probably a secret freak.

A woman will only marry a man who is above or equal to her social status.

I guarantee you his wife got a bit too cocky and turned him down sex.

His nanny saw an opportunity, became an emotional sponge, gave him a nurturing boner and took his seed.

What the fuck is critics problem? Dracula Untold was pretty cool and unique story showing how cruel bastard he was. Same with The Mummy which finally stopped beating dead horse Indiana Jones clones and provided new take like never before. Of course they hated them, meanwhile they jizz over by the numbers Blumhouse shit with Invisible Man slapped over it.

I can't smell the söymilk from your breath

People hate novelty. Look at marvel shit, every movie follows one of few formulas and it's mostly the same tone all the time. They love it.

that one is easy she is from a time before the millionaire had any money like zuck

>n-word guy
trips to the nufren

I can imagine the producers thinking she'll be perfect... and then realising that Tom didn't intend for her to be one of the monsters.

doesn't the movie end with her literally taking invisible suit and getting away? same as tom cruise taking mummy's power and getting away

3/10 face
7/10 body
>starlet

Absolutely Benthamian

It was really underwhelming because I wanted to watch a invisible dude dealing with his powers instead of some ugly girl being chased and screwed over by her crazy genius ex, its fine for what it is but 87 years from now people wont be watching

yes im sure you apply that standard to all the media you consume