Which will age better?

Holland!Spiderman becomes a lot more watchable when they drop the Stark training wheels.

You already know which one. Long live Raimi.

CGI no matter how good it gets, will always look fake because it is fake

For now.

Attached: 1560214054621.jpg (1227x690, 658.55K)

Would his Spider-Man 4 with Black Cat and Vulture have been kino?

MCU Vulture was based.

Attached: 6069316-mcu vulture.jpg (960x484, 100.99K)

>Shitty colour aesthetic

Why am I not surprised?

The only good things about MCU spider-man were the villains. There was nothing else good about it.

Raimi Spider-Man is the best iteration we've had, sure 3 was weaker than the rest but still a 6 and MCU has churned out many more movies that were much worse.
Sure the Raimi shit is better than the actual movies but they are nonironically good.

Villains in capeshit do tend to be more memorable than the heroes. Just look at Thanos or Ledger's Joker.

Raimi aged better the day Homecoming came out

I hate Spider-Man

This just sums the MCU up

Now that's some real Disney channel looking shit

considering spider-man is 18 years old and still looks great while whatever cg mess marvney put out looked like a ps2 game from release, gonna go with the former on that one!

The worst practical effects will age better than the best CGI.

Attached: riders.gif (350x250, 1.57M)

>It's you who's out Gobby, out of your mind!

And Raimi doesn't have Disney channel shit? Fuck off. Holland will keep being Spider-Man and make many more great movies, loved by millions. People already look back and hate Maguire hahahahah

Attached: mm.jpg (1131x707, 55.63K)

2002 Spiderman: That's a cute outfit, did your husband give it to you?
2020 Spiderman: My future husband gave me this outfit!

Attached: Sub-Custard necks.jpg (1600x1000, 408.4K)

Considering top came out 18 years ago and is still fondly remembered and holds up I am gonna say Raimi.

No sorry user. The way that MCU scene was shot was terrible and really on the level of Hannah Montana or some shit

>Fuck off. Holland will keep being Spider-Man and make many more great movies, loved by millions. People already look back and hate Maguire hahahahah

Attached: 1523141379612.gif (413x243, 50.98K)

>using the edit of the line

NuSpider-Man is such a cuck.

This genuinely looks like an episode of the Big Bang Theory, what the fuck. This isn't cinematic at all.
I had a book as a kid called "how to draw comics the marvel way", which had a section specifically on composition to make every single frame dynamic and dramatic, because that's "the marvel way", like their visual brand.
This isn't Marvel, it's CBS at best

based & checked

There's literally nothing memorable about MCU Spider-Man.

Who? What villains?

I know you're trolling but look at how much more depth and energy that simple head and shoulders shot has than any frame from the MCU

This is Disney Channel tier

They even used the most famous moment in Spider-Man history for Homecoming and nobody cares. It's nothing special there. Just another cog in the MCU machine

Even a clunky piece of dialogue like that doesn’t ruin the rest of this kino scene.

>a classic Peter Parkier tier quip isn't "Spidermany"

They both look fucking terrible

>Americans find this funny
This is pure embarrassing.

Attached: 1577475515797.png (480x479, 259.7K)

What moment was that?

How come we don't talk about TASM anymore? I honestly can't remember the last time that anyone has brought it up.

Attached: jpg.jpg (1200x900, 89.39K)

It's scenes like that that make me wonder how the MCU ever got popular

Most capeshit fans have long since forgotten about Rami's movies. But to answer your question they will age exactly the same. Rami's movies will be remembered for the great (2) villains and the actors who played to those villains. Rami will also be remembered to those stupid "organic" webslingers AND that abortion of a 3rd movie. MCU spiderman will be remembered because he was a fan favorite in a ridiculously large cinematic universe. The villains were also fantastic. We'll see if they fuck up the 3rd movie, I think they will fuck it up.

Attached: organic_web_shooter.jpg (1280x720, 589.5K)

The game looked better than the movie

Because even the people who like Garfield admit the second movie was mostly terrible

Isn’t that the question of the day? It’s not. It’s Garbo.

I saw Spiderman 2 for the first time in over 10 years. I was blown away by how white it was.
>no nigger music
>only one nigger extra with a minute of speaking time
>white people problems like struggling academically, planning weddings, and paying rent
>white music like "Raindrops Keep Fallin on My Head"
>traditional orchestral score with actual violins and leitmotifs and shit, actually memorable
>white humor "did Bernoulli sleep before he found the curves of quickest descent?"
>no politics whatsoever, no anti-nazi message or bigoted character awkwardly shoehorned into the story
>no pop culture references either. No one casually mentions Bennifer, the 2004 equivalent of flossing.
>the white villain sacrifices himself and has a redemption arc
It's like 2004 was a different dimension.

Why do you keep saying MCU villains are fantastic? No they’re not. I can’t even remember their names or a single piece of dialogue. Forgettable CG throwaway rubbish.

Wow I'm very glad I only watched what scenes were available on youtube

>How come we don't talk about TASM anymore?
Because in the Yas Forums cinematic universe Sony = Good and Disney = Bad.

>stop_liking_what_i_dont_like.avi.exe

It’s almost like media today is fervently prejudice.

>paying rent
>white people problems

So the niggers pay their rent huh?

You know even normalfags love the Raimi trilogy more, right?

No? I’m saying they’re genuinely throwaway, forgettable nobodies. Zero cultural staying power like Doc Oc and Goblin have.

he's right though

no, the government does.

was this scene really necessary?

Attached: 1585082605052.png (1334x750, 399.53K)

No, that’s the responsibility of their white girlfriends.

That's because people shit on it every time it gets brought up. I unironically liked the spiderman from those films than the others. It's a shame because the first and last ten minutes from the TASM2 are my favourite parts. I was one of those people who was glad that the MCU got a new spiderman but now I take that back.

youtu.be/WfV-0Yv5vNY
youtu.be/O5MGVvaiQ8s

Notice how OP cherry picks images by using a practical shot of the Spider-Man suit from the Raimi film while presenting a computer generated one on Homecoming’s behalf.

At least Tom Holland doesn’t cry for Kirsten Dunst for half of his Spidey flicks. It also helps that Kevin Feige didn’t stop his films for two minute music videos of Peter Parker walking down the streets of New York.

Attached: 4916D8B5-AAFF-49DA-B90B-04A090EEAB21.jpg (971x965, 798.23K)

Raimi's will age better.
Every time they get a new actor, they wind the clock back and put Peter back in high school. In the original comics, Peter was a HUGE dick in high school. He was the kind of person that a comic book reader would see in himself. He was arrogant yet timid, always craving attention but never making an effort to make himself presentable to his classmates. In Ditko's eyes this was a role model. When Lee and Romita took over the comic, they didn't like how Ditko conceived the character and instead of having Peter pride himself on these contradictions, they turned them into his weaknesses. Peter hates himself throughout the '60s and '70s. He has a really hard time letting the smugness of Spider-Man and the temerity of Peter Parker coexist.
This conflict is what made sales spike consistently for decades and it's what the Raimi movies capitalize on. I think most people's favorite scene from the movie isn't a Spider-Man scene, it's a Peter Parker scene. My favorite is when his penniless Aunt tries to give him some money for his birthday; Peter politely refuses and she gets angry at him. He has all this power yet can't even help his surrogate mother live in comfort. He hates this disparity, and once he closes the gap and stops being Spider-Man, he starts to love himself again. And the irony is that he eventually learns he can't do it in good faith. That's what makes him compelling -- he's doing the right thing at the cost of a completely normal life. Kids look up to Spider-Man and adults look up to Peter; he's a lifelong role model in that sense.
The Disney movies ignore all this and feature Spider-Man as a Disney Channel twink who only considers himself important if Iron Man gives him the time of day. It's the most profit-driven and stupid direction you can go with the character.

Attached: tumblr_p5ns63YMcH1su2of1o2_400.jpg (389x600, 134.05K)

>MCU villain
>it's the hero, but evil
Whoa.

>Tom Holland doesn’t cry for Kirsten Dunst for half of his Spidey flicks. It
Doesn't he just randomly cry about nothing instead?

those scenes are great, way to show you're a fucking pleb

>At least Tom Holland doesn’t cry for Kirsten Dunst for half of his Spidey flicks.
No, he just cries about everything else including not getting blacked.

Holy shit was this copy pasta? That was a damn good read.

Is this actually from a film or is this some Doug Walker sketch?

I'm in love with that iteration of Spider-Man's aunt too.

Attached: 1389257509848.jpg (334x366, 10.05K)

It's really not even a choice. Raimi number 2 is probably the best capeshit movie of all time.
Hell it was so iconic that marvel copied the train scene and put it in nuspidey.