On that Bombshell moment

## Hits pipe ##
So Margo Robbie's character steps into the Fox Weinsteins office, he asks her to do a twirl and lift up her panties and show some cameltoe so she can get a $200k job.

There was/is no gun, no threat to her or her family, nothing about losing her job.

She says "ok" smiling - didn't say "na thanks mate" and walk out of the room

Who was in the wrong here again??

Attached: stop_flexing_your_muscles_jordan.webm (1162x808, 2.94M)

Other urls found in this thread:

businessinsider.com/prostitutes-price-a-30-box-of-chips-2009-6
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

He's guilty of third degree rape obviously because he doesn't have her consent, where such lack of consent is by reason of some factor other than incapacity to consent.

I like her fingernails
I think I'll check out this movie

she consented by lifting up her skirt

Because of the implication

Attached: XaRz0vF.png (301x311, 199.23K)

Abusing your position of power is rapey sweetheart

Imagine having sex with Margot Robbie

Attached: reflect_7db0e9de-69af-472a-a773-a1b9b47176ec.jpg (1052x1500, 674.73K)

No, he's already been convicted under the New York Penal Code section 130.25 and sentenced to 23 years in prison.

And having sex with your boyfriend after he gives you flowers is Prostitutioney sweetheart, but we don't throw your gal pals in jail for it now do we?

She was never in any danger

she never said no. A jury can be wrong.

That’s why it is a civil court matter not criminal

Yas Forums says she's ugly but...

>She says "ok" smiling - didn't say "na thanks mate" and walk out of the room
Do you want the job or not?

wat

If her lack of consent is by reason of some factor other than incapacity to consent then you're a rapist. That's how it is now.

So weird. Was he holding her at gunpoint? Why didn't simply she walk out?

Imagine tasting her used sticky panties

>do this or get fired

>blonde hair
>black eyebrows
Explain.

Attached: Margot Robbie Bombshell 2019 [29.20-29.23].webm (1920x800, 2.76M)

Attached: Margot Robbie Bombshell 2019 [35.32-35.41].webm (1920x800, 3M)

What is the snl chick doing there?

They don't even talk about how disappointing that must have been for the guy.

You're expecting to see some hot ass panties, and she's got those boring nude ones on. She's lucky if he gave her the job for that shit

If you have sex with someone after they give you a gift. That's Prostitution
businessinsider.com/prostitutes-price-a-30-box-of-chips-2009-6
If your boyfriend gives you a 30$ box of chips and then you have sex with him, that's prostitution.

Are you dumb faggots still whining about that fat kike getting locked up. I hope tyrone caves his fucking skull in and you faggots stop whining about him.

>choose between money or dignity
why they are even trying to justify this, its not like a matter or life or death, it's just money, people quit jobs for less than this

In english doc

I don't give a fuck about the kike, it's the fact that the vague law even exists in the land of the free and the home of the brave.

Attached: file.png (743x584, 67.48K)

What a fucking tard

So if she lifting her skirt wasn't consent, what was it?

That sounds like a law meant to protect retards, children, and the mentally disabled. But you gotta remember you don’t have to prove anything in a trial. Just convince the jury that’s usually made up of people with the IQ of your coworkers.

>If you want this job, you have to eat some bugs
>"No"
>directed by M. High Shyamalan
Jesus. You know, collectively, women have given me no reason to respect them

We can simplify your stupid argument.

Do you believe coercion exists or not?

Should've asked her to take out her panties

NOOOOOOO not the kikerino not the harvey warvey boy hes a good boy he dindu nuffin those whores

Yes
But it exists from both sides

so the incels going to be spamming this thread daily for the next few months? into the filter it goes

no more good webms from this flick?

She was coerced in to lifting her skirt by someone in a position of power with the implication that if she doesn't comply it could mean that she would be fired from her job and/or have her reputation tarnished pretty much meaning that her career would be ruined completely. This is without adding the pressure that the person is in at the moment that might make them do rash decisions without thinking of the consequences or having them think rationally and look for a way out of the situation. Sort of like black mail, the person in a position of power holds leverage against the other person and will enforce that power to gain sexual favors. It isn't that hard to understand.

On the subject of Harvey though, what he did was shitty but then again, he did give a lot of those whores jobs for at least two decades. They kept their mouth shuts the whole time, and I would understand it but they also went on to become part of his harem and parade the red carpet with him on multiple occasions. They did it because they wanted to be famous and sacrificed their dignity for money.

I do not believe any one women saying she had no idea about getting those gigs in Hollywood. Years later, with fading looks and attention, they wanted to make the big buck once again. On the other side, I do not care about the jew, who lost his own game.

>engages in sexual intercourse
I must have missed the scene where Margot robbie gets creampied

>On the subject of Harvey though, what he did was shitty but then again, he did give a lot of those whores jobs for at least two decades. They kept their mouth shuts the whole time, and I would understand it but they also went on to become part of his harem and parade the red carpet with him on multiple occasions. They did it because they wanted to be famous and sacrificed their dignity for money.

Pretty much boils down to this. Harvey initiated the "evil", and he is to blame for pretty much all of it. Could the girls have been principled and said no and left? Yes, kind of. But their livelihoods and careers are threatened merely by Weinstein doing what he did. A refusal of him is basically them ending their careers, and accusing him with little to no proof would go nowhere.

But then, even though Weinstein is guilty, make no mistake: these girls dove in head first and encouraged it because they saw dollar signs. Melissa Thompson encouraged Weinstein. He asked if he could flirt with her. She said yes, a little bit. He continued groping her, and when he did it too much and asked him to stop, he did stop. Harvey asked to see her at a motel later, and by her own volition she showed up. She claims she went to the motel with no clue that he intended to have sex(nobody with a brain believes this). She knew exactly what she was getting into and chose to allow it to happen. That being said, she obviously did not want to actually have sex with him and if he didn't come onto her at all, it would never happen. She had sex with him for her job and her career because she likely felt she had no choice.

Imagine doing literally nothing wrong and going to jail for it

the REAL victims are the people who actually said no and dont have a platform to combat the kikes, not the old crones who decide that they were raped 50 years after they sold any semblance of integrity they had by showing their panties for cash. fuck em.

Attached: hebig.png (1435x1196, 1.44M)

Gross the SNL dyke is in it?
I was gonna watch this too but not anymore.

hello based department

>breast reduction
Dropped

Attached: 1434544924606.jpg (591x559, 125.13K)

>black men in the USA legal system
not hard to imagine

both parts are wrong, retards
he by taking advantage of his position and she by selling her dignity for money
people like him are patetic and should be hanged in public
she is not better than a whore
stop discussing this shit

back in the good old days she wouldve had to get fucked or at least given dome

She got kino fingers. No plastic extension crap. Cute finger and nails

Attached: 8efa42c4fb1a0765-596x400.jpg (596x334, 37.08K)

based margot

Unironically this.
If multiple people are involved in a crime of their own free will, they're both responsible. But nowadays certain criminals get held up on a pedestal and get treated like courageous heroes because of our empowering 'believe women' ideology. The reality is that they're just feckless cowards who can't take responsibility for their own choices and hide behind the old media to prop themselves up.

is robbie box office cancer yet? all her movies bombed.

>Who was in the wrong here again??
They both were

Brainlet cannot see the obvious that he's set up as a sacrificial lamb to legitimise the carte blanche "prosecution" of any enemies of the hegemony by using women as the social enforcement agency of the state.

I'd hang him til his beady little eyes bulged for fun, but if you think setting the precedent that not even millions can save you from being disappeared then I don't know what to say to you.

At least there's one American that doesn't have slave admixture

Isn't it sexist because an equally qualified male can't compete with her 'toe?

We had this thread yesterday.
I will post some stuff for the Robbers.

Attached: Hmmm.jpg (505x581, 58.7K)

Attached: 001 (3).jpg (800x1200, 123.21K)