Why didn't he rape her?

even a man with an invisible dick isn’t that desperate

that was his brother, did you even watch the movie?

I literally fast forwarded through half of the movie it was so boring and predictable

Yeah that wasn't his brother, that was the cover. Did YOU watch the movie?

do you think he sniffed her feet after pulling the blanket off?

Ermmm sweety. Don’t you know a woman can fend off any attacker even if he’s invisible!

He'd be appropriating black peoples culture and that's wrong.

>brave incel take
how to tell someone has never had sex with just one post

I really rooted for him. Since the scene where he playfully set her meal on fire.

there was literally 0 evidence he wasn't telling the truth. she killed him cause she couldn't forgive him for what he did before. she was the real titular invisible man. thats the twist of the film and why she keeps the suit at the end. in case there's a sequel.

How did he see out of this, let alone rape someone?

Attached: 784932432.jpg (1101x667, 82.24K)

I shouldn't be surprised that you morons would say this is the plot so you can be all cute. Your explanation makes zero sense for the movie. Why would they have it actually be the brother, besides your gay ass "real villain" incel shit?

Nigger I had sex after I watched this movie. Eat a fucking dick.

The 0 evidence is that that when you watch a movie you're supposed to believe what it tells you the fucking villain did lmao. Do you think they made the movie with the intention that you think Elizabeth Moss isn't a reliable protagonist? There is zero evidence not to take the movie straight. You're reaching.

so would the baby be half invisible

The movie was shit and it wanted the ending to be ambiguous. Change my mind

Agreed, but then again the brother was sent to kill the little black girl so its entirely possible he was sent to deal with the sister. But yeah, probably was the main guy

What's her relationship with the black cop?

Would you rape that thing?

for me its the steak, what dish do you pick bros?

Attached: 14515464.jpg (1817x797, 99.1K)

>Invisible Man
>invisible enemy
>first movie on demand for covid
Gee what a coincidence

she isn't an unreliable protagonist, everything that happened in the movie happened. she killed him and lied to the cop about it. why? because she finally had the power to that she didn't have when they were in a relationship. its the end of her character arc. she becomes the villain, or not if you agree with her that the boyfriend deserved to die for their relationship, but the boyfriend was telling the truth at the end.

She killed a guy, who could be technically innocent. His brother killed all these cops and probably that other girl too. Meanwhile she murdered the other guy just because. She's pretty nasty and toxic character, possibly psycho too. No wonder there are people rooting for Adrian. Maybe he was manipulative and bossy but that's no reason to kill him.

>jizzum is stored in the balls
based user

Why didn't she just use fucking thermal goggles?

>Maybe he was manipulative and bossy but that's no reason to kill him
are you suggesting adrian had no role in it whatsoever? even manipulating someone to do the killing for you would be justification for a good old revenge killing in this case.

>just whip out your $4000 pair of thermal binoculars
stupid girl

Suit has thermal isolation.

Also note that the movie is about reversed psychology. The fact that this bitch got away with kill symbolizes that men are always fucked. For example divorce or other abuse. Almost everyone sides with women and men have hard time, even if it's not their fault. Look at that shit with Johnny Depp and Amber what's her name? Anyway I hope this makes people open their eyes and realise that women get away with pretty much everything, even if they are guilty.

>Suit has thermal isolation.
the fact that you can see him breathing out in the cold air means that that would be able to see him with any thermal imaging technology

Attached: 1368921782622.gif (144x144, 738.7K)

>create revolutionary suit that makes you invisible and will change the world
>use it to stalk and get revenge on your 3/10 ex because she left you

Attached: 1582158147671.gif (200x200, 3.89M)

Yeah, I was under the impression that he may or may not have been involved. I lean toward yes, though. I was confused as to how the cops knew to look for the brother in the basement, and how they produced a body that would pass the rigors of a coroner, since he was the invisible man, not some sort of clone farmer. It was kind of a suspension of disbelief issue that could have been avoided if the script had him die by other means.
>As per OP's question he may have been highly concerned that high impact sexual violence would cause a miscairrage.

Because he isn't retarded. If he had raped her there would be DNA evidence that he was alive and she wasn't insane. semen, hair, skin, something would be left behind, and the ruse would be over. are you a brainlet, OP?

Yeah but user Elizabeth Moss was the villain the whole time haven't you been following the crackerjack theories on here

I was wondering this too, At first I thought he was the sister's husband, but apparently that wasn't the case. was he literally just a friend that is for some reason okay with putting up a potentially unstable woman at the drop of a hat?

What would you do if you were invincible?

kill myself

>invincible
>kill yourself
??????

One of two villains. She and the brother. Adrian is the final victim, literally. The ending is awful and I feel sorry for him.

Are these people being ironically retarded or do they really believe that? It's possible that his little brother was the one doing all the harassment/killing in the movie and the older brother was just watching via that tablet that can see out of all the suit camera's. but he was still involved at least on a planning/voyeuristic level as we know from the "surprise" comment at the end of the movie.

Can you find me one other review that shares this take on the movie? Just one.

yeah

Attached: 1555005200530.jpg (869x1218, 230.65K)

the movie was going to part of that shitty dark universe along with the tom cruise mummy and dracula. Why would they kill the villain if they need him later? You really think there was a version of this film where elizabeth moss is killed and the guy gets a sequel? she was always meant to be the villain. they already made the mummy was a woman, they can't make frankenstien or dracula a woman, so the invisible man has to be a woman.

Tbh they're being edgy incels
>the villain is innocent. Muh elon musk power fantasy
>"ugly" main character, victim of domestic violence, is the actual villain.

Homosex doesn't count nigger.

the dark universe version of this movie had johnny depp and was supposed to be the original story
this one wasnt even supposed to be a thing until the dark universe got canned

This movie wasn't made to be connected to any of that. At all. This script is completely different from the original Invisible Man they were doing.

invisible semen though

Oh boy you got me, MovieMan42.

you're letting politics get in the way of the very obvious ending. this is like the retards who think Signs is about aliens when the whole movie hits you over the head with them being demons

>Johnny Depp as the abusive Invisible Man
>Amber Herd as the ex-girlfriend
Would have been amazing.

>The Chad Take
Supporting Adrian AND acknowledging him as the villain

Attached: Big Brain.jpg (831x1024, 67.93K)

Nah, you dont get to play that card. I asked you to show me one other review that shares your bullshit take. That's it. You're disingenuous.

and it would have been just like in real life