Where did Arthur learn how to shoot?

but he managed to kill all 3, what other way could he have done it

Attached: WOKEr.webm (1000x532, 2.61M)

>Didnt blow his brains out

How do you even resist that?

Highschool

Its capeshit, probably ironman or aquaman or someone like that taught him

This one is cringe. The one with the actual huge saloon and cemetery is based

Why was clown man so upset all the time? Why the fuck did he dance so much? Is this peak capeshit?

Attached: 1581889118790.png (618x225, 64.2K)

the movie takes place in 1981, since Zoro the Gay Blade is in theaters.

why delete?

try sprinting 100 meters and then shooting your gun, it won't be easy

It's not capeshit at all

autistic rage

YOU CAN DANCE IF YOU WANT TO
YOU CAN LEAVE YOUR FRIENDS BEHIND

Attached: FIRE DANCE.webm (1000x532, 2.82M)

he was point blank, also revolvers are pretty retard proof when it comes to shooting them.

>point gun where you want bullet to go
>pull trigger
>bullet goes in that general direction

>shooting a revolver point blank
a monkey could do it

Was Bruce Wayne in it? Its capeshit.

>no capes
>no superpowers
>no CGI
>no quips
>no feminism pandering
>no china pandering
Not capeshit buddy, try again

Its capeshit, my dear incel. Its based on a cartoon and is made for adolescents who need rather simple movies.

Both of you have sex

>no capes
>no superpowers
>no CGI
>no quips
>no feminism pandering
>no china pandering
Waiting for the arguments, take all the time you need

youtu.be/4fTAxcfEKBU

he didn't, none of it is real. It's just a power fantasy.

>Batman villain flick
>Not capeshit
Sure buddy

If it was named Arthur, absolutely nobody would give a shit, my dear capeshitting manbaby.

Read and then >if it was named differently it would be the same movie but not capeshit
>A=B, and B isn't capeshit, so A is capeshit
Big brain post right here fellows

That is some mental gymnastics faggot. All of you brainlets watched it with the framework of Batman, Gotham, Wayne's and origin story of nuJoker in mind.
If it was a the identical story about mentally ill man in 70's Chicago, nobody would give a shit.

>If it was a the identical story about mentally ill man in 70's Chicago
>the same movie but not capeshit
>A=B, B isn't capeshit, A is though
Maybe you should take a little time before posting so you don't embarrass yourself like this bro

7/11

>ITS A MATURE ARTHOUSE FLICK, THE MOST HONEST MOVIE YOU WILL EVER SEE HE DOESNT EVEN FLY NLT CAPESHIT HE USES THE SUPERVILLAIN MAKEUP BUT THATS IRRELEVANT OK NO ARGUMENT WELL FUCK YOU AND FUCK THIS BOARD FOR NOT APPRECIATING JOKERINO YOULL GET WHAT YOU FUCKING DESERVE

Attached: images - 2020-02-21T050752.125.jpg (491x625, 31.96K)

Not an argument, my seething buddy

It's a plothole

You are right. It's just shit

>peak capeshit
The movie is actually very anti capeshit that most capeshitters hates the movie

>movie is called joker
>famous supervillain
>takes place in Gotham
>the movie is about Arthur literally turning into clown man
>batman's origin is in it
>generic story with a predictable structure, usually for comic book and videogame movies that change and existing script in order to get to a certain famous comic book scene (the murray scene was a direct reference to the dark knight returns) and attract audiences
Yup, I'm thinking capeshit

>Learn to shot

Do you seriously believe you need some kind of training to shot someone at

ok fattie

doesn't matter if you are fat or not when sprinting, sweety

Because he knows how to shoot. The whole story was by his perspective being told to that black therapist in the end. He's a delusional unreliable liar told a story of himself being a victim by everyone. Joker lies all the time it's part of his character even Ledger's joker told different stories about his scars.

Attached: IMG_20200203_122717.jpg (410x620, 30.36K)

So is he going to fight Ironman in the next movie? Was lying his superpower?

>He's a delusional unreliable liar told a story of himself being a victim by everyone.
>I am not making this up! The ending gave it away!

Attached: 1582572410999.jpg (187x250, 8.57K)

Haha where did you find this picture of me haha

Yes Joker being a sly hack is pretty much his superpower. But always end up being a punching bag for batman because that's why he was created.

Why did his fellow clown give him a gun and be nice to him, only to make fun of him and act like they’ve never spoken?

>Joker lies all the time it's part of his character even Ledger's joker told different stories about his scars.

wait

>Not capeshit buddy, try again

can redditors come to an agreement for once?

Attached: c7c.png (612x491, 105.87K)

>only to make fun of him and act like they’ve never spoken
Bad writting, he was a two faced asshole but there was never an indication of that, he is just an actor saying lines and not a real character, capeshit flicks are like that and I hope this coronavirus shit finally finishes off this cancer trend of superhero cringe

That's implying Yas Forums isn't just reddit at this point

Yas Forums and Yas Forums are almost complete reddit, the rest is just usual 4channel cringe

I can't believe some people didn't get it this way, Imagine being too stupid to get a Todd Phillips movie that someone else had to explain it and Todd himself mentioned the unreliable narrator twice.
The unreliable narrator idea was his intention all along in case he plans for a sequel so Joaquin Phoenix can be free to play joker differently or not necessarily the same as the first one, since Joaquin never done a sequel before and playing a character the same each time is not his thing. Joaquin also mentioned how he doesn't feel like he played joker at his full potential and that there are different colors of the character he wants to explore.
All that screams Joaquin joker will come back but with a different version of joker.

>>movie is called joker
>>famous supervillain
>>takes place in Gotham
>>the movie is about Arthur literally turning into clown man
>>batman's origin is in it
None of this are arguments, please apply yourself
>>generic story with a predictable structure, usually for comic book and videogame movies that change and existing script in order to get to a certain famous comic book scene (the murray scene was a direct reference to the dark knight returns) and attract audiences
I'm thinking this is pure cope but I'll bite, eloborate on how the structure is generic, what capeshit flicks have the same structure of joker and why

>everybody who disagrees with me is the same person
I-is this a disneyshill thread? I thought you guys got all fired after disney lost 40% of its value in a week and is on the brink of getting bailed out?

funny, most of my capeshit lovimg friends loved it

>none of this are arguments
according to who, sweetie?

According to formal logic, you want to prove Joker is a capeshit movie and you're only offering surface level shit that doesn't turn a movie into capeshit. If Casablanca was called Bogartman vs Hitler: Dawn of Nazis it wouldn't become capeshit. You want to prove its capeshit, then prove it has the formal traits of capeshit, you know CGI battles, tension defusing quips, strong womyn beating 6'2 thugs, that kind of stuff

>no arguments
ignore logic all you want sweetie, reply to me once you have real arguments instead of your buzzword extravaganza right there.