Untitled

And yet those buzzwords accurately boil down how stupid religitards are

you have to be 18 to post here.

gods not dead 3 poster looks dope af not gonna lie

>religitards

Attached: Fedora.jpg (960x757, 83.99K)

don't you have a school to shoot, incel?

All trash

How can one possibly believe in something that doesn't exist in reality?

>tfw mass is canceled for the rest of the month

the same way atheists believe in science

>The Passion of the Christ
>Catholic
lmao

Is science not an observation of reality?

>protestants are our brothers in Chris-
youtube.com/watch?v=uM1mzvBtpCg

Attached: joshua.jpg (1000x1563, 115.38K)

>made pic related
>promoted LGBTQ
>'Islam is not evil' propaganda
>Catholics are full of pedophiles and homosexuals
>Nun had a baby with Moslem immigrant
>Italy got hit the hardest by Corona
Catholics should learn their limit now.

Attached: The-New-Pope.jpg (1000x522, 48.35K)

Lol, ur going 2 hell, faggot.

how you gonna cancel easter?

Go back to your pope dressed in the silk, gold and jewels in the image of Jesus Christ.

All accurate. Why are you sperging?

That's about all Catholics have on Protestants. Sola Fide.

but if you keep asking 'why', at one point science will hold up its hands and say "that's just the way it is"

what is the difference?

How do you perceive reality? Does our perception determine reality?

this. catholicism is gay. priests can't even marry so they prey on little boys
t. lifelong catholic. it's all style and no substance.

t. amerimutt

Im a Protestant, and agreed

ok upside down satan

I see no arguments, only impotent christcucks seething into the void.

> jew worship
lel

is that critic's name Dick Rash?

Europoor here, what's the difference between strains of abrahamicuckism?

Science actually produces results. Come back here when you can show prayer actually do something tangible.

>at one point science will hold up its hands and say "that's just the way it is"
No, at that point science just says "I don't know".

You mean saying "I don't know"?
Well, there is a consensus on what is real according to what our brains can percieve, is there not? Objective phenomena such as gravity? Light?

>not knowing your own history
Sad!

Amen!
Edgy arthouse shit

i prayed that you would become a faggot and lo

Dilating is not science

Atheism is secular judaism and you're more religious than even the most devout evangelical

Why are you literally begging for there to be more gay ben? Are you a cockhungry faggot yourself?

>you're more religious than even the most devout evangelical

Lol, look at the size of this cope. This is a literal "no u" argument that a 4-year-old would come up with.

I guess a better question would be, does our perception limit reality? The New Testament claims to be an eyewitness record of supernatural events from multiple sources. Supernatural cannot be reproduced in a lab. Just because something is not scientifically observable/possible/probable, that doesn't mean it didn't happen.

What did you guys think of Silence? Either on it's own as a film or as an adaption of the book?

gay ben? who is ben?

>eyewitness record
You realize this is considered to be the least reliable form of evidence, right?
Also, you somehow don't trust eyewitness evidence with regards to other religions, hmmm...

How many Atheist's do you think have actually researched in depth the science they claim BTFOS Christians. You're not smarter for being an Atheist, it's just an excuse for hedonism.

his twitter still exists

twitter.com/LucasTheMagnif

it's literally one of Scorsese best, The Irishman really felt like a let down after this

>Catholic films
>Protestant dogshit
>Not including Orthodox KINO

Attached: smh my head.jpg (363x500, 54.88K)

>not doing sports is a sport

Its the priest that diddled you as a kid.

>You're not smarter for being an Atheist

Statistically, I am.
independent.co.uk/news/science/atheists-more-intelligent-than-religious-people-faith-instinct-cleverness-a7742766.html

What if hundreds of people saw it? If you can't trust your own senses, what can you trust? Why is it that twelve people on a jury are enough to convict a criminal, but the testimony of twelve apostles cannot be trusted?

I'd agree with the other user that its one of Scorsese's best, one of my favorites from the past few years. Not the biggest fan of garfield but he did a good job I thought.
And I think it adapted the book pretty good, don't think there were many changes done, I think that one japanese character that always betrays the priests was added in but don't remember