For what reason does a magical school have a designated evil house?

What I don't understand is why they were specifically the RACIST house.

Like, they are ambitious and ruthless, right? But the first thing ambitious and ruthless people do is to stop caring about accidents of birth, because those are needless ties for their ambitions. If marrying a mudblood gets you ahead, the ambitious ruthless person would do it.

damn, messed it up again

Attached: 1554128816115.png (1200x900, 35.08K)

Evil is human. Humans can be evil. Hogwarts takes in all young wizards and witches, both good and evil.

Slughorn didn't care if you were a filthy mudblood or from a long line of pure blooded wizards. What mattered to him was how successful you could be. Voldemort's influence made the house racist.

Attached: 4-horace-slughorn.jpg (600x600, 147.08K)

this. gotta put them somewhere

If were being honest, cus rowling is a hack.

In the books, Slytherines weren't always evil they were just ambitious. But then voldy turned his friends evil and all their kids had to be in slytherin too

>the obvious protagonist house
>the obvious antagonist house
>the obvious irrelevant side character houses

I've only ever seen the first two movies and I can't remember a single character from Hufflepuff or Ravenclaw

>Voldemort's influence made the house racist

Wasn't the very founder a huge racist?

Because there were none. They added characters from those houses in later movies to make them relevant.

>wanting pureblood dogs is smart and healthy
>wanting pureblood wizards is racist
what did the (((Ministry))) mean by this?

The Founding Fathers of the USA were also racist. Doesn't mean that USA now has the same attitudes that the Founding Fathers had. Look at all the Pride Parades that are hosted in the country. Same is true for Slytherin House.

They are not evil. It's hogwarts that's evil. You have no right to judge them.

Attached: kurtz.jpg (1777x966, 46.55K)

>trying to hang onto concepts such as good and evil despite not having an objective moral framework

Attached: 1574274497354.gif (498x498, 561.72K)

Why does prime teen witch pussy sound so appealing?

Yeah but he also put in a giant snake under the castle for the purpose of killing mudbloods in the purpose

containment house

Yeah but Slytherin had a reason to not like Muggles back then since people persecuted them

I think the idea is Malfoy's ancestors were ruthless and that's why they're rich now, as opposed to the Weasley's who never cared that much
>But the first thing ambitious and ruthless people do is to stop caring about accidents of birth
Which is why some of the two biggest Slytherins, Voldemort and Snape, hide their ancestry

tb h this is one of the most accurate criticisms of the series, Salazar Slytherin was supposed to be a brilliant wizard who let his racism cloud his judgement. Somehow that logically led him to hiding a fucking monster snake in a school to kill innocent children

Oh you two don't seem to get it, the reason both of those things are true is because Rowling is a hack that wanted to put in some of the most basic bitch socio-politcal commentary into her book:
>Racism bad
>Aristocracy bad
And just lumped it into one house.

Purebred dogs are unhealthy and often inbred though
Mongrels are often tougher and live longer

For the same reason that there is a house for literal human leftovers, because its part of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 1480194209347.jpg (1565x2823, 2.76M)

>Purebred dogs are unhealthy and often inbred though
Because they have such a small breeding population genetically.
You can argue one way or another that Wizards are/n't in a similar situation since there's little to no world building in that regard, since Rowling is still a hack.

Based.

all the wizards are basically aristocrats you retard
also
>noooooo how dare rowling say racism is bad when it's so h*ckin awesome!

>all the wizards are basically aristocrats
And only one house has the attitude of an Aristocratic class, retard.

>>noooooo how dare rowling say racism is bad when it's so h*ckin awesome!
>Rowling is a hack that wanted to put in some of the most basic bitch socio-politcal commentary into her book

There, you got me to respond you driveling cretin, oh my mistake, you were just pretending to be retarded.
Great joke, 10/10.

>driveling cretin

Attached: 1436505089144.jpg (540x720, 113.07K)

ITs perseption, grifindor is and always was evil, they are clearly the headmasters favorite, and hehelps them cheat every end of the year. Slytherin just has some unlikable figures but in actuality they where always ahead of every house on every subject, every year.

who was from hufflepuff?

I agree but there is a framework.
>protags good
>antags bad
this is why libtards are libtarded

Cedric diggory or w/e

wasn't he gryffindor?

Damn, just can't seem to get it right

Attached: pp.png (275x183, 4.74K)

you are racist.

No his whole schtick was being the only hufflepuff that was anything. Maybe its different in the movie I going off memory of the book that I read 20 years ago

and he died lol

what happens to muggleborn who end up sorted into Slytherin? Like if you were born to normies and discover you have magic, wouldn't you be ambitious in wanting to move up in the world?

You get killed by giant snek, that's what you get

they get what they fucking deserve

Epic! Simply epic! Mind if I post this on /r/rareinsults? So freakin’ hella epic!
Edit: Thanks for the gold, kind nigger!

God it's fucking easy to get on your nerves.

Attached: 1583365003360.jpg (960x928, 74.87K)

Slytherin is for the cunning, with an additional caveat of "purebloods only" because Slytherin held blood above everything else.

besides Cedric, Newt, the MC from Fantastic Beasts, is a hufflepuff. And feminists won't shut up about how great of a character he is. I like him though.

@130862302
How do I upvote this?

Honestly its easy to see where the anti-muggleborn angle comes from and why purebloods believe it, Hermione is the perfect example of the worst sort of mudblood.
Comes into the wizarding world with all her muggle ideas, and shit talks all their ancient traditions and culture, and want's to change things to be more "sensible" and muggleish.
Good Muggleborn would adapt and accept their new culture, not try to change it, they can fuck off back to their normie world if they don't like it.

Well what would you do with an invisiblity cloak, Yas Forums?

Attached: 1567874517921.webm (640x264, 940.69K)

how come Slytherin didn't enchant the Sorting Hat to be able to determine blood and keep mudbloods like v*ldemort and severus out?

Attached: 1435651499356.png (300x188, 22.37K)

Consider the logistics of raping someone in the Harry Potter universe using an Invisibility Cloak.

Since the invisibility isn't innate and works like a one-way mirror, you would either be forced to swaddle yourself in the cloak and rape through the cloth, which would ensure your anonymity but reduce the physical pleasure derived from said forced intercourse due to the fabric of the cloak acting as a diaphragm or deathly hallow condom.

You could cut a hole in the cloak but several references in the book make mention of the cloak's unusual durability and after the deed you would have a hole in the cloak.

In the movie depiction however, the cloak turns its wearer and anything underneath it invisible via the arbitrary act of putting it on so there is a danger that during the rape, the victim might get under the cloak and identify Harry as the attacker.

The cloak also doesn't give protection from the Maurauder's Map and if Harry, like in Hollow man, proceeded to rape his neighbor three minutes after receiving the invisibility cloak as a Christmas present, would have a diminished pool of suitable victims due to most of the students having gone home for the holidays and he would be raping in full view of the current owners of the Marauders Map at the time (Fred and George Weasley)

TL;DR: dont rape with the invsibility cloak unless it's securely fastened on to you and have the marauders map in your possession

Attached: 1573972417072.jpg (620x387, 73.66K)

and they are picked to be evil as children and just allowed to... be evil?

Frankly there are plenty of easier options to rape in the Wizarding world. Love potions, stunning spell, Imperius curse, Polyjuice to frame someone, etc the list goes on.

and?

Attached: 1583721625071.jpg (750x395, 80.34K)

just wear a mask or something and only use the cloak as a getaway.

>love potions
not the same at all, it has to be rape
>stunning spell
well now they're unconscious, wheres the fun in that?
>mind control
boring
there has to be a struggle you know

>Hat sends all the evil children to Slytherin
>wanted to put Harry in there
It knew the boy was bad, we should have known after he bought all the treats on the train so no one else could have any.

>that muggleborn couple that steals hairs from hollywood celebrities for their polyjuice potion sexual escapades

For what reason does an internet anime image board have a containment board for evil retards?
It's the same concept, Slytherin is the Yas Forums of Harry Potter
/mlp/ is Hufflepuff

seething

Ravenclaw is obviously /lit/
what board is Gryffindor?

r/Yas Forums

Nobody who would qualify for gryffindor would stay here long enough to need a board