Is this movie that bad/disturbing? I've been watching some other Pasolini stuff and there's some great movies in there, is this worth watching?
Is this movie that bad/disturbing? I've been watching some other Pasolini stuff and there's some great movies in there...
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
that picture makes my peepee twitch. What's it about?
It's pretty tame compared to today's standards. I wasn't a fan of the film.
No. It's just some torture porn and people getting raped a lot with some shit eating thrown in. If you've been on the internet for several years you've seen a lot worse. I can imagine at the time it came out (the 70s) it was repulsive
it's shitty
dude coprophilia and bdsm lmao
It's more annoying than disturbing. The adults are way too smug about their depravity which isn't even *that* big of a deal.
His Canterbury Tales ( I racconti di Canterbury) is great. I've been published on it a few times.
reminder the director got assassinated
God I want Alita to step on my cock
It's peak demented italian nonsense. I honestly wouldn't recommend it but it's definitely...something.
Good
Some old dude ask to get buttfucked in front of everyone during lunch and it's great
It’s beyond fucking stupid. Watch just so you can say the same thing.
There are no characters, and thus you can't really care for anything that happens to the kids. It's just evil for evil's sake. And once you realize that, it becomes funny, and loses all meaning it had.
One guy looks like Gerard Butler, and another guy just makes "creepy" faces the entire film.
he was a weirdo commie bastard
>Is this movie that bad/disturbing?
No
>is this worth watching?
Yes
it's deep because it has naked people
Reminds me of my time in a catholic boarding school in the German Alps
But can I use it to successfully coom?
That cover is so hot.
It was one of my prized possessions during my "if it's obscure and/or infamous I HAVE to have it" phase and I praised it to high hell then and yet thought it was hilarious. I still think it's hilarious but its really just pretentious crap. Bla bla bla fascism bad but i'm gonna use it as an excuse to show off my degenerate sexual fetishes. The director got killed by a 14 year old boy prostitute btw. It's still somewhat shocking imo even though yes, one finds MUCH worse even on youtube these days and like i said it's oddly funny but it's mostly boring and pretentious and just too smug and heavy handed for its own good. And i really believe the director made it so he could mostly openly jack off to his faggoty pleasures.
no its not disturbing at all
i fell for the meme because some retarded normalfag was talking about how fucked up the movie is so i watched it and its really tame
The book is so much better it's not funny, Pasolini killed all the philosophy it has, killed all the fun sexual stuff and the setting he chose is retarded commie propaganda
Despite of it being disgusting and a disturbing movie due to the nasty shit that was shown in the movie, but i couldn't even feel the "WOW THIS MOVIE IS SO GREAT AND ARTISTIC AND SO CREATIVE, LIKE LOOK HOW PASOLINI DESCRIBED ARISTOCRATICS AND HOW FILTHY THEIR ACTIONS AND BEHAVIOURS ARE" feeling that people keep repeating , i dont mind watching something filthy as salo as long as it is sending messages to me as a spectator , but this movie is literally empty nothing in it is good its totally garbage the only message the movie was delivering was a stupid commu propaganda , of course it isn't worth watching unless you like watching rape and eating shit scenes and sadism
Nah the book is shit too.
>stupid commu propaganda
which is? the guy above you was babbling the same thing
subtext user
Pasolini has three great movies: Accattone, Mamma Roma and The Gospel According to St. Matthew. Everything else is commie gobbledygook
Bla bla look how aristocrats are degenerates they fuck kids eat shit
yes
it's not commie propaganda it's anti-fascist/anti-aristocrat propaganda. though id be entirely unsurprised if the director were in fact some sort of commie
This, chances are that if you have been browsing this place for a while the movie will not do much for you.
I still got kinda hard at some scenes though, I like the idea of powerful men having total control over cute twinks.
About a bunch of based Italians that kidnap cute teens and make them eat doodoo
that dude is a legend
>University students, most of them liberals, were both perplexed and angered because Pasolini, a man who had long promoted himself as a friend of the masses, refused to support their movement for a fairer, more representative government. He further infuriated Italy’s liberal element by taking a stand against the legalization of divorce, as well as abortion.
>Although he had mocked the family in Teorema and had referred to marriage as “a funeral rite,” the filmmaker now claimed he had always revered the tradition of heterosexual marriage and the family. Also irritating was the fact that Pasolini, although homosexual, kept a noticeable distance from Italy’s budding gay and lesbian community, even going so far as to oppose its efforts to secure gay rights legislation.
>His antigay stance did not prevent him from cruising for underage sex partners six nights a week at precisely the same hour each evening; indeed his sexual addiction was in full swing until the moment of his death.
>at precisely the same hour each evening
based
i am very happy that this director was murdered
Maybe when it comes to violence but the sexual degeneracy on display would give any non-fetish production a heart attack.
Basetti
cringe
I thought it was supposed to be funny, actually. To show how right wing political movements are inherently degenerate and degrading while putting up a false front of cordial behavior which normalizes the inherent violence of their authority.
>pissed of everyone
>preyed on little kids
>made a literal shitpost in movie form
Is Pasolini, dare I say it, /ourguy/?
>*a shot of a beautiful boy's penis*
>heh, nothing personal, kid
Pasolini was such a chad
It's art, you wouldn't get it
He also made the GOAT Jesus biopic
If you’ve spent enough time on Yas Forums you’re probably desensitized enough to where you’ll just be bored.
>I form my political opinions from movies directed by degenerate indulging artists.
Very liberal, very progressive.
>shit
haha I get it
It is as disturbing as you think, its not something you want to watch again.
homosexual shit fetish director is murdered by the teen he was raping
>cope
>dilate
homos are NOT ourguys
homos are destroying society
I first watched this when I was 13, stop being a little bitch
>It's pretty tame compared to today's standards.
You should read a synopsis of the manuscripts it's based on.
I read it thinking how graphic can a pornographic manuscript from the 18th century be?
Well,
>the final 150 anecdotes are those involving murder. They include perverts who skin children alive, disembowel pregnant women, burn entire families alive and kill newborn babies in front of their mothers. The final tale is the only one since the simple passions of November written in detail. It features the 'Hell Libertine' who masturbates while watching 15 teenage girls being simultaneously tortured to death. During this month, the libertines brutally kill three of the four daughters they have between them, along with four of the female children and two of the male ones. The murder of one of the girls, 15-year-old Augustine, is described in great detail, with the tortures she is subjected to including having her flesh stripped from her limbs, her vagina being mutilated and her intestines being pulled out of her sliced-open belly and burned.
en.wikipedia.org
why did he write this?
He was horny
more like the 120 days of social distancing
Still waiting for the Gilles de Rais biopic.
green text
but that’s based
redpill me on this guy
Why not
Would you say the film insists upon itself?
Although Gilles de Rais was convicted of murdering many children by his confessions and the detailed eyewitness accounts of his own confederates and victims' parents,[46] doubts have persisted about the verdict. Counterarguments are based on the theory that Rais was himself a victim of an ecclesiastic plot or act of revenge by the Catholic Church or French State. Doubts about Rais' guilt have long persisted because the Duke of Brittany, who was given the authority to prosecute, received all the titles to Rais' former lands after his conviction. The Duke then divided the land among his own nobles. Writers such as secret societies specialist Jean-Pierre Bayard, in his book Plaidoyer pour Gilles de Rais, contend he was a victim of the Inquisition.
I wish I was a Nazi raping some Italian cutes.
He was really just a greasy hipster Zefferelli in the end and I can't take him too seriously for this reason
he wrote it in prison because he was relentlessly horny and bored out of his mind I would guess
>he had managed to alienate practically all the country's religious and political factions
Yeah im thinking he's