Mr. Potter, I don't feel so good

DEH

Why did he turn into confetti at the end?

>And what’s the point in having a killing curse when Molly’s exploding spell seems to be 50x better, no words, no projectile, instant-kill from explosion

technically she first petrified her then shattered her to pieces, so it took longer than the "you died" spell.

Attached: tom ridehl.png (656x1077, 1.26M)

because it's for little kids and you can't actually have people dying realistically.

What's the point in shooting spells when you can shoot a gun which is clearly much faster than a spell since humans have enough reaction time to regularly deflect them

...piss off

Attached: 1579909058613.png (509x445, 268.81K)

HBP is the best book. Rowling's comedic timing is at it's peek, Draco finally gets an arc, critical sleuthing lessons from the D man him self and Snape pulls off the ringer.
Will say the ending of umbridge getting run through by centaurs was the most satisfying ending for any of the villains

magic is an allegory to guns.

Attached: ok.jpg (600x600, 30.35K)

Also, Voldemort would not be able to sustain a magical barrier around him on a constant basis. A sniper could dome Volde from across the map and then the Death Eaters would be back to where they were before Goblet of Fire.

I guess they would all go home then and just patiently wait for Voldemort to have a body again.

Still better than the killing curse tho. It’s instant kill and you have to really want to kill the person for it to work. Seems like petrifaction or whatever it was (looks like she was vacuumed or something, which looked and sound painful) and then exploded seems way more violent and evil than just killing someone

I'd argue the first book is actually the best since it's much more focused on the neat magical stuff and less on the generic evil lord uprising

Voldemort should've just been dead, and his "return" should've just been Wormtail lying and getting the Death Eaters all worked up and all the events of books 4-7 were just a bunch of panicking former Death Eaters doing all the stuff thinking Voldemort was about to re-emerge, and the end of book 7 should've just been a big reveal that Voldemort was just a corpse all along and it was the fear of him that drove people mad. It would've been way more kino and fit in more with Rowlings self proclaimed themes of fear driving people to do bad things. But no instead we got another uninteresting cackling dark lord who was defeated due to a lawyer's technicality. Brava Rowling.

Attached: 58280af1180000180030db1f.jpg (615x409, 54.72K)

Hermione takes too long to become a likeable character and Hagrid being manipulated by eleven year old kind of irked me, even when I was eleven reading it for the first time.
But I'll agree, the introduction to the under cover magical world was extremely fulfilling

I think this would have been better actually. Even though I like the voldememes this would have allowed for some more intelligent storytelling. They could have taken the lie really far and had a Voldemort double and everything.

he's just enamored by seeing the boy who lived

This asshole had CLEAR bias toward Gryffindor. Slytherin won fair and square. Cunty Dumbledork had to fucking ruin it for everyone just because Potter and his gang of retards did some shit that they should have been EXPELLED for!

Or was Hagrid the dark lord all along?

The idea that one has to kill the other in the end is pretty central to the story.

>T. Pansy parkinggarage

Attached: images (6).jpg (202x250, 9.2K)

Based DEH poster.

That was just shoe horned in during book 5.

it's also stupid. Following a theme is much better than "muh prophecy, muh chosen one" which is also resolved by a mere "AKCHTUALLY OI WON DA WAND SO..."

What's silly though is that Harry didn't kill him, Voldemort just Wile E Coyoted himself. I guess the proficy could sort of be fulfilled by the horcrux hunting and destroying though..?

Attached: source.gif (469x361, 926.33K)

Shut the fuck up Potter! You think you can just come into the Slytherin common room and rape me with your invisibility cloak? You sick motherfucker, I'll have you know I have over 300 confirmed Abra Kadabras!

Attached: deh, nigga.png (683x384, 281.11K)

No!

Order of the Phoenix was actually my favorite after Prisoner of Azkaban. Goblet of Fire and Half Blood Prince were absolute garbage.

Killing Curse is supposed to be unblockable (unless ur Harry vs Voldemort, specifically), Molly's spell was probably a powerful gardening/cooking spell she'd normally use to burrow or dispose of waste , and Bellatrix could've countered it easily if she hadn't been caught off guard.

Just realized now that pretty much all the faculty at Hogwarts is single. Relationships and romances are only vaguely alluded to unless it’s happening to one of the main characters, and the only prominent father figures in any of the books/movies are weirdos (Ron’s dad), villains (Draco’s dad), and traitors (Luna’s dad).

Granted, many authors seem to forget that characters actually have families in the background, but it’s kind of funny that in Rowling’s magical world most wizards aren’t getting any.

Not him but I suppose thats true.
Honestly though him just flopping backwards in the books was a pretty kino way to die, especially after Harry explains that the wand won't harm him. It dismantles him completely.

It's not rape when you love it! I had you talking like Olivander that night, "Potter, 12 inches, firm, exceptional for cunalingus work!!"

Attached: intro-1572462010.jpg (1000x562, 73.58K)

Ron's dad doesn't seem that weird the man provided for like 6 kids

The dude couldn't keep his hands off his plump ginger milf, Arthur Weasley was the most absolute based mad man of the series.

A good response to the gun conundrum is this: guns aren't insta-kill like in CoD, it takes minutes or hours to kill from anything but a point blank range. Any wizard could easily heal themselves. It's also easily countered, they can shield themselves or transfigure a gun to be useless or directly harmful to the user. Also wizard healing is extremely potent, as long as the soul is there, people get healed from shit like deep slashes, wounds, explosions, poison, steep falls etc no problem. Hell Harry tore Malfoy the fuck up, but a simple healing from Snape had him back up on his legs the next day.

Avada Kedevra is simply overpowered, it's impossible to block, and unlike other spells/weapons it literally destroys your soul.

I said SHUT THE FUCK UP Potter! Having sex while wearing an invisibility cloak negates oneself to give consent. It doesn't matter if I liked it or not! You're such an asshole Potter, you fucking scumbag rapist.

Attached: pansy.jpg (288x450, 17.56K)

Get some sleep, Voldemort, you look tired.

Attached: unnamed (2).jpg (512x171, 24.8K)

When did everyone read these books? I remember reading the first one when it came out back in like 5th grade but it just seemed gay

HOGWARTS HOGWARTS HOGGY HOGGY HOGWARTS

>but at least in the movies he had some unsettling presence around him
Ralph Fiennes.

I guess you don't want to be the one in the cloak next time like I promised in your ear while you climaxed, then.

Attached: source (1).gif (500x213, 496.68K)

BuwEEEEEEEEEEEEE
BuwEEEEEEEEEEEEE

I don't remember you whispering anything to me. I was drunk and you used an invisibility cloak! I'll see you at your Wizengamot hearing you sick fuck. Enjoy Azkaban!

I think the films got worse as the series progressed, because the films were getting shorter while the books were getting longer. I think a big part of the success of the Harry Potter books is that they have a lot of detail in them, and that makes the world feel more real. But the movies got a lot shorter as time went on, especially compared to their respective page counts. I'm not counting the 7th book, because it got two movies (which I thought followed the books rather well), but Order of the Pheonix is the longest book in the series by far, at 870 pages, yet it also got the shortest running time, at 138 minutes. Compare this to Chamber of Secrets: 162 minutes, for just 341 pages. As you cut down on running time, you cut back on the details that created the sense of immersion for the reader, and what you're left with is like a highlights reel of the movie that only has meaning if you've read the book and know what to expect. I think that for someone who hasn't read the books, the first 3 and the 7th HP movies would still hold up on their own, but I don't see how 4-6 would.

Attached: vold hug.webm (960x401, 548.95K)

get a room you faggots

We have one you retard. It's called Harry Potter's Wizengamot hearing at the Ministry of Magic. You stupid fucking muggle. You're lucky I don't Abra Kadabra you right now.

youtu.be/ilp3MBOg2Pc?t=139
??????????????

Attached: 1578625472425.jpg (667x1313, 302.47K)

You can lock me up, but you'll never be able to satisfied by Draco ever again, and that small gratification will keep the dementors off me for years. Not to mention the thought of what you moaned to me hafter my hood slipped off before we finished. You might have changed my patronus

Part 7 was horrid in terms of following the books
So many simple details they could add but just skipped over

HP patronus was already pretty based, a stag which symbolises him as a cuckolder (the one doing the fucking )
But turning it into a bull ?
Bravo Rowling