ITT: Garbage movie "criticisms". I'll start

My brother in law didn't want to watch Event Horizon because he said there was no way they could have done a good spaceship movie back in 97.

Lots happen in El Camino, though.

Well since cheap CGI became such a staple of bid budget movies I fell like this criticism actually became valid. Blockbusters from 2011 look like dogshit now because the CGI gets outdated so ridiculously fast.

That it feels it was written by using a formula or a step by step recipe. Like copying the Hero's journey 1:1.

Not really. Also films don't have to be deep, whatever that means. The Tree of Life gets called pretentious very often yet when you engage in the dialogue with given person you find out that they simply did not get the film at any level whatsoever. It's really embarrassing.

HOW TO SPOT A BRAINLET PLEB 101

>only able to discuss literal plot points and the logical order of the narrative of a film
>every film has a singular universal "deep meaning" which you have to "get" to understand it
>"The writing is the most important filmmaking element!"
>thinks that empty pretty pictures means "good cinematography"
>"I don't find this part of the narrative plausible or realistic, therefore the movie is SHIT!"
>treating a film like a puzzle which you have to put together in a certain kind of way to get it
>"Who cares about editing, framing and composition sound and whatnot if the 'story' isn't great."
>a film is either utter dogshit or a masterpiece, there is no inbetween
>"the acting in this film is not naturalistic, so the acting is SHIT"
>considers heavy use of direct symbolism as a positive factor
>using "boring" and "nothing happens" as arguments ever

Attached: 1489085877822.jpg (638x479, 91.88K)

Well I was referring more to pre-CGI films, where faggots see the classical acting styles and non-ADHD editing/pacing and complain about it

any reviewer that uses the word "problematic" deserves a slow and painful death

...

>powerful
>topical
>the movie we need in the Trump era