Would native americans really harm an innocent, unarmed woman?
Would native americans really harm an innocent, unarmed woman?
I don't think so. They're a peaceful people.
They were called savages for a reason. Read a history book.
>implying history books would be honest about atrocities committed by non-whites
Is this one of the most high-test things ever put to film?
>but we're not licked yet
RATTLE'D
Middle America has some beautiful places and scenery in it tbqh. I imagine the Oregon trail is spectacular
I wish that guy was my dad
Yes
I read a first person account fo a woman kidnapped by Lakota Sioux somewhere between Kansas and Montana. She basically described them as niggers. Woemn do all the work and men sit around and occasionally do something violent for material gain. They apparently were not very industrious and just waited around to rob other tribes or white people passing by. She only escaped because she was ransomed, they murdered her 4 year old daughter by smashing her head in with a tomahawk
*hits pipe*
Source
Slave of the Sioux- The Fanny Kelly Captivity Narrative, 1864
goodreads.com
She's too classic.
Indians are worse than niggers in my opinion, I've had some great black friends but I've never met a redskin that wasn't a whiny, violent prick or a fat slut
Yes they would. I don't want to dox myself, but natives kidnapped and tortured a guy from my town literally last week. They were awful in the 1600's and they haven't gotten much better
> books written by whites
kek
Indians were the epitome if savages. There’s pics of the aftermath of little big horn. They not only scalped all the men but they cut off their dicks, stuffed arrow heads into their dicks, slashed or all the diners and major muscle groups, bashed their skills in with tomahawks and clubs. A lot of this done while the Men were still alive. I don’t care about the plight of these people or the fact we stole their land, there’s no excuse for that level of barbarism, enemy or not. White man shot his enemy then captured them when they surrendered like gentlemen.
did they ever rape whit*y
>That cute little helpless face she makes.
Just ripe for a cock.
My grandfather on my father's side was half Native, but Natives are so weird to me now that they are all basically drunks. Seriously, if you don't live near any look up just how bad alcoholism is within Native American communities. Way more prevalent than crack was for blacks.
>Would native americans really harm an innocent, unarmed woman?
Depends on the tribe, most were violent but ones like the Comanche were legitimately psychopathic.
It's not like non-whites could write history books.
>Mr. Massipost had two daughters, young ladies, intelligent and accomplished. These the savages murdered most brutally. The head of one of them was afterward found, severed from the body, attached to a fish-hook, and hung upon a nail. His son, a young man of twenty-four years, was also killed. Mr. Massipost and a son of eight years escaped to New Ulm.[40]:141
>The daughter of Mr. Schwandt, enceinte [pregnant], was cut open, as was learned afterward, the child taken alive from the mother, and nailed to a tree. The son of Mr. Schwandt, aged thirteen years, who had been beaten by the Indians, until dead, as was supposed, was present, and saw the entire tragedy. He saw the child taken alive from the body of his sister, Mrs. Waltz, and nailed to a tree in the yard. It struggled some time after the nails were driven through it! This occurred in the forenoon of Monday, 18th of August, 1862.[40]:300–301
They murdered, tortured and raped each other for thousands of years
Depends on the tribe and circumstances.
is this the ginger snaps girl?
IS that her? Looks different as fuck.
dont act like you whiteys never did some savage shit in your history.
It was honestly great. I laughed so hard when he calls the chief Indian the "head bugaboo" and stays that killing him would "mean bad juju for the rest of them."
why are natives always drunk, depressed, and suicidal? I really doubt it has anything to do with their people being killed centuries ago. black people are not like this, jews are not like this, armenians are not like this. so I have to ask, is it just in their genes? maybe they've just always been like that from the beginning.
I didn't.
da cuzzins luv da fire water, paleface
Right now white American males and American Indian males have the highest rates of suicide. It's not totally clear why in either case. Alcohol is a relatively recent thing for natives, they may not have the long standing cultural norms needed to deal with, there may even be a lack of genetic tolerance.
>is it just in their genes?
Yes, natives actually do have a genetic predisposition to alcoholism, their organisms can't handle alcohol as well as other races.
Glanton and the judge did nothing wrong
Still cant tell lol
they weren't introduced to alcohol until settlers showed up, they can't really handle the stuff
what town?
Nope. Same kinda face though.
Violence and brutality is universal across human cultures.
There were Indigenous and European conquerors in the same time period and often same region. The only difference is the Europeans empires lasted longer.
but what about the depression and suicidal tendencies, is that related to the alcohol?
basically told us to kill a dog if it's a nuisance otherwise you end up with a bullet between the eyes.
Absolutely. Before white man pacified them, they were literal savages. Many Native Americans admit as much.
depends on the group. some were very hospitable people other groups names could cause people to up root and run because if they were caught in a raid they would be raped, hunted for sport or enslaved. The Comanche were an example of the latter.
>Would native americans really harm an innocent, unarmed woman?
yes they did. study some history shit head
...as if the Irish can.
Northwest coast natives were especially brutal to each other. The Haida and other groups had a vibrant slave trade and when juan de fuca visited Hecate straight in the 1600s and showed the locals the concept of cannons, the Haida traded everything they could for 3 brass swivel guns and a large amount of gun powder. they than mounted these guns on their war boats and genocided every other village in their region.
>en.wikipedia.org
Americans Indians were responsible for the First School Shooting, little known fact!
Taking slaves and warbrides from neighboring tribes is good in general in neolithic Americana.
They're both defeated people. It's pretty clear why they'd have high suicide rates.
Indians are utterly subhuman and irredeemable savages. We should have killed every last one of them.
They're also the worse case of crabs in a barrel. Had a college friend tell me he has to go back to the reservation and find work there, couldn't move where he wanted. Had to keep the traditional of being a broke alcoholic nigga for his people
Horrible bait. Native Americans would murder the men and women but take in children but if they were too old they’d kill the children too
Just watched The Searchers and the answer is yes
Spent 3 months on a reserve for work and its a sad sight. Still drunk the morning after outside the liquor store begging for cigarettes or for you to go inside for them cause they are too fucked up. High rate of suicide, 2 twelve year olds killed themselves during my first 2 weeks.
They are illegal aliens trespassing on their land and bringing their shit culture with them.
The indians had the moral right to drive them back by all means necessary.
>no land deeds
>no banks
>no infrastructure
Yeah, I don’t think so pal
to be fair the US banks and infrasturcture are in shambles
That was super badass. And a good example to keep fighting and not give up
>measuring civilization by banks
They did, we just made a habit of burning them.
Castle Doctrine
Who? The Indians on the East Coast that lived in permanent settlements and farmed, that adopted European customs and were called the "Five Civilized Tribes", lived in European style homes, dressed in European style clothes, adopted Christianity, printed their own newspapers, and were deported to the West in the 1830s because white people wanted their land?
Perhaps you'd care to explain how the Indian Removal and Trail of Tears were the act of a Civilized and Enlightened people?
The American Indian wars only killed about 40K people.
There were millions of Indigenous people in the Americas
>Perhaps you'd care to explain how the Indian Removal and Trail of Tears were the act of a Civilized and Enlightened people?
>Writing in 1969, Francis Paul Prucha argued that Jackson's removal of the Five Civilized Tribes from the very hostile white environment in the Old South to Oklahoma probably saved their very existence.[111]
yes, they're savages
In violation of the Supreme Court ruling siding with the Indians PROPERTY RIGHTS btw
What sort of Civilized people ignore the rulings of their own courts and take anothers land by force of arms?
And almost none were killed in warfare.
>The Indian wars under the government of the United States have been more than 40 in number. They have cost the lives of about 19,000 white men, women and children, including those killed in individual combats, and the lives of about 30,000 Indians. The actual number of killed and wounded Indians must be very much higher than the number given ... Fifty percent additional would be a safe estimate.[60]
>we have to violate your rights and steal your land for your own protection
They were
American Indians have very low birthrates and high rates of intermarriage right now. When they aren't actually secluded, especially in the far more racist past and disease ridden past they essentially get absorbed or fade away and cease to exist.
They died from having a weak immune system not warfare. The smart tribes who were small and being subjugated by the larger tribes allied with Europeans to kill off the larger more violent tribes. The few battles that did happen wasn’t entirely bad for the tribes considering they were fighting between themselves even when Europeans were settling
>Having been recaptured by the savages, and brought back to Kittanny, she was put to death in an unheard of way. First, they scalped her; next, they laid burning splinters of wood, here and there, upon her body, and then they cut off her ears and fingers, forcing them into her mouth so that she had to swallow them. Amidst such torments, this woman lived from nine o'clock in the morning until toward sunset, when a French officer took compassion on her, and put her out of her misery. An English soldier, on the contrary, named John, who escaped from prison at Lancaster and joined the French, had a piece of flesh cut from her body, and ate it. When she was dead, the Indians chopped her in two, through the middle, and let her lie until the dogs came and devoured her
Source? I just provided the actual data on military conflict from about 1790 to 1894.
Historically they'd kidnap rape and torture her and then offer her as ransom. They'd either kill her before the deal or give her to the whites/Mexicans in her tortured state.
The whites and or Mexicans would become engaged and fuck the natives shit up.
This happened a ridiculous amount of times throughout the history of America