I've avoided this gay shit forever, what am i in for bros?

Despite their s-jew following. They're pretty much the perfect franchise. No genuinely bad films in the series.

Goblet of Fire has a cult following? I'd say it's easily the most hated one, which easily makes it the most underrated one since it's pure kino.

I don't know why you'd start this now. It was great to grow up with, but everyone's moved on except for those looking back at it critically.

>unwatchable garbage with no redeeming qualities whatsoever
the David Yates films are really, truly irredeemably bad. Yates seriously must be literally in bed with Rowling to have kept his hands on the franchise that long.

I still don't get the hate that 6 has picked up.
Its probably my 2nd or 3rd favorite of the series. I mean I've seen some people on here place it lower than the 4th which is objectively the worst book and film.

>quentin
imagine taking a bait image seriously

>imagine taking a bait image seriously

Attached: 1464884586147.png (640x629, 366.06K)

>the 4th which is objectively the worst book and film
looks like the pleb filter is working as intended

Attached: 1571956496459.gif (245x300, 1.76M)

Reddit weather

Attached: 1573324230153.gif (500x375, 2.94M)

gay shit, but the third and fourth movies are okay

Attached: 1546467601974.jpg (2128x3000, 635.92K)

i remember them being bland, formulaic, and boring, but not particularly homosexual. were they?

Attached: 1548440505410.jpg (1200x1800, 237.47K)

>Citizen Bane

Why didn't the "wizards" just cast themselves out of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
a-at least the books were good though
"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 632F1215-E0EA-4D1B-A3A4-4846BCBDAF34.jpg (1623x2886, 1.27M)

Attached: 1548440572343.jpg (3500x2332, 1.87M)

Attached: 1550587012965.jpg (540x740, 101.56K)

Yeah, no. Its just a mess because the book was. The filter is the Columbus films because people go in not expecting comfy shenanigans.

based

>No Clifford
>No effort intro
>Wrong formatting
0.5/10

Attached: 1550874438707.jpg (410x1040, 90.04K)

Attached: 1553125154221.jpg (768x1024, 117.07K)

imagine the smell

I too have avoided Harry Potter movies and books my entire life. You might as well keep ignoring it.

>Quentin is a baneposter
I knew he was a patrician but god damn

Attached: 1553711520253.jpg (1931x2900, 578.94K)

It's what people like this guy like.

Attached: Harry Potter.jpg (960x960, 101.83K)

I like all the Yates movies more than the first 2 and Goblet.

Attached: 1556588937009.jpg (1200x680, 99.68K)

IMAGINE THE SMELL

Attached: 1582733616496.jpg (2995x4493, 3.51M)

God i wish shed had never outgrown this sultry sexy whorish phase

Attached: 1554831267984.jpg (1888x2808, 716.3K)

she looks super cute in these fucking harvested photos, I hate it

Attached: 1553112197007.jpg (2084x3536, 628.34K)

That’s about right. Although DH Part 2 I find pretty good if only for the fact that everything comes full circle and the overall story comes into focus.

:^)

Attached: 1558718595741.jpg (564x1033, 85.8K)

imagine unironically thinking Goblet is not the best film

Attached: 1559596352645.jpg (1498x2000, 298.65K)

I watched the first movie with a friend of mine
it was very bland, the movie just didnt have anything interesting in it and Quiddich makes no sense
Im sure kids would like it, otherwise it was a waste of time

Attached: 1559596965438.jpg (2102x3000, 772.15K)

Today I remind them.

Attached: BEB409FB-B769-4207-B7A4-C31FFB8CD134.jpg (5268x2240, 1.97M)

Attached: 1563733113347.jpg (460x537, 60.76K)

shameful display, but I would still bend her over.

Series turns into a slog after the third one. PoA was actually good due to a talented director.

Attached: 1564767758400.jpg (2704x2347, 1.04M)

Attached: ADDED803-9263-4A15-B49C-E664D257AF2F.jpg (500x270, 38.09K)

You literally never see woman wear these jeans anymore. They are all too fat and wear jeans over their hips that hide their FUPA.

>cropping out her face
????

Attached: 1570909668878.jpg (1280x1861, 214.44K)

I like the pink one the best :3

>Cropping out her best feature

Attached: 1573657760212.jpg (734x980, 360.71K)

I dunno lol

the first one is really comfy. half blood prince is really cool. all the others suck

Attached: 1572965294311.png (1278x1588, 3.65M)

HP movies are kino