Why did he turn into a massive pussy bitch in later years? He was a gigachad in the first few movies

Why do you make such trash threads?

>villains should be strong willed and moral otherwise it's unrealistic
You guys are obvious as shit, btw.

a thread died for this...

Cedric was a chad

Because girls liked him so much despite being a intended as a villainous bully (or perhaps because of it), so JK had to emasculate him to end the red pilling realization that women like bad boys, and not goody two shoes heroic Harry.

his spirit was broken from years of headmaster faggotbeard rigging things so harry always wins

>Drago
Not sure who you're referring to user we're talking about Draco here

harry is constantly breaking the law and getting in trouble. He basically joins a revolutionary gang too

No. Most bullies actually have a very inflated ego.

Yeah Harry is a bad boy for "good" reasons. Also how rich is it that Yas Forums loves a literal rich kid stereotype that was given everything in the world and is still an asshole, and thinks this should be the hero and not Harry.

That's insecurity.

Why are blonde always the bad guys. There is a clear anti-bonde bigotry in America.

The Harry potter series is british tho

You guys ever get tired of the cute concern troll shit

He wasn't. The films only made him such. In the books his character is very consistent throughout. He is a smart boy who finds himself forced into a role by his father that he doesnt actually care for.
Dracos characterization in the 6th Book is extremely well done, as his torment of the task given to him slowly unravels his mind. The film never did him justice.

No. They can be insecure, but most of the time they just feel entitled, or better than others. That is not insecurity

Cedric was a chad, so were Bill and Charlie Weasley.

That is insecurity. The aggression is compensation.

it's just to be edgy, people like Malfoy in HP represent the old racist aristocracy. Though it's a bit odd that Rowling chose so many central characters to be part of this blood nobility. Harry's dad, Sirius Black, the Weasleys are poor but pureblood

ACCIO HAIRLINE

Attached: tom-felton-harry-potter-sixth-film-rumour-1573556793.jpg (480x720, 57.7K)

They made him too cool in the first two films and Rowling hated that, because he wanted him to be a bad bully racist.
As the films continued and she had finished her books, Rofling took a bigger role as the creator of the saga and she started throwing her weight around. As a result, Malfoy turned into a boring bitch who never had a proper fight with Potter at the end, which is what everybody wanted.

No he wasn't. He was a pussy bitch since the first movie.

If you kill your enemies you lose
War is peace
Worse is good

I'm assuming that was so she could show that not all people who are part of the old conservative ways are evil, even people who benefited from pureblood rules. This goes against the talking point that she's a SJW and hates everything, though.

>gigachad
He was just a richfag twink desu

Oh no no no

>revolutionary gang that wants to preserve the status quo, which includes the enslavement of house elves and hiding from muggles rather than bringing the benefits of magic to the whole world.

You don't need to be aggressive if you don't feel your status or identity is threatened. You've a poor understanding of human emotions.

There's actually a history of this, there's no "anti-blond" stuff, but it related to british theater, since most of the high class was anglo and a lot of the aristocracy was what back then was considered a "teutonic" look, the blond actors with thinner facial features would play the richfags while the brown haired actors with potato noses would portray briton, welsh and irish characters (aka poorfags). This eventually influenced american and british movies. It's a trend not a rule, but it''s the same kind of tend that gave us "white hats" and "black hats", it's social coding for the media, not really bigotry. But if everyone on set is from the same race, and you want to create the illusion of different people and classes the best way is yo separate them using wigs that have different lengths, colors etc.

So get me this. The whole story is basically "racism is bad" based on bloodlines, yet if you google a Harry Potter character or look someone up on the wiki, the first descriptor of each character is almost always their blood-type (half-blood, pure-blood, muggleborn, squib, or muggle).

Why is that?

Malfoy being agressive to mudbloods is not insecurity.

It's a revolutionary gang because it operates in secret from a government that would imprison them. The books very much play up this aspect of le ebin rebellion.

I don't know some people are just assholes and act aggressively for fun, not because they feel threatened. The Malfoy character is such a stereotypical cowardly bully that it doesnt really apply to him though.

Everyone in Harry Potter
>Mudblood, how could you!
Also everyone in HP
>Oh hes just a MUGGLE!
Rowling really never caught on to the irony.

Don't talk to me or my son ever again

Attached: Zelenka.jpg (1000x567, 76.02K)

The "fun" part is asserting and re-enforcing their ego. That's what feels good. It isn't just "they do bad and feel good"

Yes it is. It's because he's "supposed" to be better than them but they are better than him at being a wizard? How isn't that obvious?

He was always a pussy ass nigga that couldn't back his shittalking.

Because you can still have an identity that doesn't include discriminating against people who aren't you? How isn't this obvious that that's the point?

You don't think sadism exists?

his dad pimped out his actual bitch pussy out to voldemort's anaconda

>it's us versus everyone else
actually the most redpilled view

>Malfoy turned into a boring bitch who never had a proper fight with Potter at the end, which is what everybody wanted.
I never wanted it, but it should have happened. Seeing their rivalry escalate would've been cool. You'd think Malfoy would have at least tried to kill Harry. Least he had a decent change from seeing how bad Voldie was and how his family got treated like shit despite being purebloods. Gonna be honest would've thought he'd bang Hermoine. Things always felt sexual between them.

>to the point the only girl interested in him was an ugly girl
That was just rowling being a cunt dude was rich blonde and attractive

It's not common. At all. True sadism.

He had the confident assurance of youth. He carried his belief systems into adolescence and thats why he began losing confidence. The problem isnt malfoy, but harry, who does the same thing but is constantly reqarded for his black and white thinking.

I swear the movie studios paid him off so he would intentionally go downhill. To prove their point about grumpf hitler or something

He was self concious about being a werewolf

>That was just rowling being a cunt dude was rich blonde and attractive
I know you are likely a brazillian, but he was BLOND not blonde, as for attractive i don't know where you got that from, very few characters are descrived as "attractive" and Draco isn't one of those, he wasn't the only rich one, being rich doesn't mean anything if you are just one of many other rich guys. His family name was a bigger deal, but half of the people there would hate his family and people from muggle and mixed families would dislike him.

It's easy to live as a kid following everything your parents fed you.

It gets harder when you get older and start to decide things for yourself and you realize your parents are actually fallible and can be full of shit sometimes

lol no it's just bong genetics. rupert grint isn't exactly doing so well either

even the HP girls weren't spared except maybe for emma watson

>except maybe for emma watson

Attached: 1583764969905.jpg (518x518, 73.23K)

Did someone paid you to get fat and not get laid?

My hair transplant surgeon will hear about this Potter!

>fails at everything
>virgin
>unpopular
>constantly being bested by the geeky guy who also gets all the girls
Gigachad... right...