who was in the wrong here?
the "13-year old" was actually a 25 year old guy and he clearly didn't want to have sex with him
Who was in the wrong here?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
He simply gave them a choice...
>talks to someone pretending to be 13
So no crime was committed?
Bleed
how many times are we going to have this discussion. IT'S 1000% ENTRAPMENT. moralfags get btfo literally every single time we have this thread.
Imagine not only having it be broadcast to the world that you are a ped, but a gay ped at that
So he committed the severe crime of chatting with an adult online?
He wanted to sneed and feed with 13 y/o. Doesn't matter if there was one or not. Anyone who has those thoughts should be in prison like meatball man.
SO pretty much thought crime. Why don't they use actual underage kids for the stings?
No it's not. A crime was committed once the sexual talk starts.
>gay ped
redundant
Only pedos have a problem with these sickos being arrested.
Imagine how gay you must be to pretending to be attracted to women, but only ones that don't have tits or ass.
>actually white-knighting these creeps who want to fuck kids
The biggest issue is how all the guys they “catch” are almost full retard tier or obviously slow.
Literally thought crime... America aint the free nation I once thought.
>13-year old
The "pedo" was in the wrong for being into hags.
This one is worse
youtube.com
The guy didn't even say anything sexual in the chat. He came over as a math tutor and they had nothing on him
Nigger, he came to the house with full intent to fuck a 13 year old. That's not simply a thought at that point. He was going to act on his urges. He could've been chatting with an actual 13 year old in that chat room.
Picture this
>buy guns
>arrive at school
>pull the trigger at some students
>HAHA WE GAVE YOU A BB GUN HAHA YOU ARE FREE OF CHARGES
Retard. Nigger. Fucking faggot. Kill yourself asap.
>>actually white-knighting these creeps who want to fuck kids
I want that Jurassic Park shirt.
looks like he spared some expense where his outfit was concerned
Answer the second part of the post, wouldn't charges stick better if they used real kids to bait them in?
Classic rosie cheeked pedo
Who gives a shit, the dude walked in the door 100% convinced there's a kid inside. He proved himself being capable of fucking a kid.
Is being capable of committing a crime al that it takes to be convicted? Quit getting so worked up and emotional over this and think critically.
I like ya, and I want ya. Now we can do this the easy way, or we can do this the hard way, the choice is yours.
No, because they get convicted anyways. It would literally be the same result, only with more autism.
what is roleplaying?
I'm sad and glad I grew up in a family where someone was always at the house with me. I'm happy because I wouldn't have screwed over someone for life for having sex with an underage kid. On the other hand the size difference between kid me and an adult would have been hot, especially for a guy built like in the video.
...just me...
...my MOMMY...
...and my DADDY...
>Built
That man was haphazardly thrown together like an overdue science fair project
If the police intentionally convinced him to go shoot up a school and provided him with guns then yes, that would be entrapment and shouldn't be punished.
>what is roleplaying?
The surefire way to avoid TCAP and the way that they helped real predators remain free.
Could anyone have stopped him if Chris wasn’t there?
Newfags actually think everyone on Yas Forums is a pedo.
Haphazardly built guys are the best. If you have an even half decent body they'll worship you because both parties know you can do better. They'll be grateful and try harder than someone as attractive as you. They also have no self confidence so you'll be the one in control. Once you tire of them you can end it and they'll accept it because they know it was too good to last. It's perfect.
>gay
>ped
Two sides of the same coin
do kids really know the tern netflix n chill?
based gay user putting ugly homos in their place
Anyone is capable of having sex with a minor. Better throw everyone in prison.
that guy is literally me
Post pictures. I gotta nut.
nice try fbi
They never get that far. He should be actively penis in the child before an arrest is made. What if he changes his mind at the last minute?
I'll get you next time.
Is hansen ever gonna do anymore hvp? I just want more tcap content bros.
What a ridiculous outfit to get your bone on.
He wasn't busted for showing up. He was busted for sending a dick pic to who he thought was a 13 year old boy on Grinder. Which is a felony. He just made it easy to nab him, don't have to subpoena Grindr and all that pesky shit.
>3 minutes after contact, dick pick
>Didn't show up for sex
Uh huh.
It's 1000% not entrapment, because entrapment is a legal term used for the state doing it - the people he was interacting with aren't cops or government workers.
you're using moral jusfifications to assert it was entrapment and to imply that entrapment is wrong to use on pedos. who's the moralfag here?
Oh, there was dick pic sending?
He’s going to have to Dennis his way out of that one.
"I don't even know why I sent that" - from the OP's video. He knew what he was doing, and he knew the moment he saw Hansen, everything he said would be used in court. They're all innocent, of course. None of them want to fuck 13 year olds, of course.
Odd how the judges just don't seem to believe them.
>Odd how the judges just don't seem to believe them.
cause the judges are pedos who want all the kids for emselves
Grown man wearing shorts anywhere but the beach or his backyard is always in the wrong.
>This guy is 27
yikes
Wow honestly these rock solid meme images and buzzwords have truly shaken my opinions. At first I thought child rapists were mental children that graduated from scatology and transvestism onto molestation. But I admit I was wrong!
Turns out, unless you manage to permanently ruin a child's life for sexual pleasure, nothing is wrong with you. Doesn't matter if you're into kiddie porn, or grooming, or are planning a rape. It's fine.
Thanks Yas Forums you've done it again.
>Turns out, unless you manage to permanently ruin a child's life for sexual pleasure, nothing is wrong with you. Doesn't matter if you're into kiddie porn, or grooming, or are planning a rape. It's fine.
gay men are pedophiles 80% of the time.
My gay coworker briefly said casually how he'd fuck married men while he was in high school
>Want to come in? Come in.
based cunnyseur
>Jesse Velez Uncut
Does it really make a difference if he's uncut?
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO THINK ABOUT THE MAKE UP CHILD HE WAS GOING TO FUCK