Would you say he contributed positively or negatively towards the development of your country?
Now that the dust has settled
Other urls found in this thread:
en.m.wikipedia.org
en.m.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
I get to wear super cool hugo boss coats which he funded. so positively i guess
its over
He's the reason why the US became the sole superpower in the world, I appreciate what he's done for us!
Hero
Hard to say.
Without him, America-senpai would never have noticed us and given us money to join them instead of Hitler; which would've put us even more behind than we already are.
...
But if the latter hadn't happened, we would never have lost our kino fascist dictator Getulio Vargas.
So, I'll settle on a 'maybe'.
negatively politically
positively economically in long-term run
cuck
>gave everyone a third of our territory
>dragged us into the war
>in the end indirectly made us commies
Negatively
the maori gangs here dress in german helmets and use swastikas and say sieg heil
so negatively i guess
Pakistani here. He dabbed on the Anglos so hard, they had to leave India. His alleged crimes are now also used to eternally guilt Western Europeans into becoming more "tolerant". I would say a big positive