Avada kedavra

>avada kedavra

Attached: 1584607923827.png (1117x1182, 965.88K)

>NOOOOOOOOO GIGACHAD YOU CANT JUST USE DARK MAGIC ITS BEEN FORBIDDEN BY THE MINISTRY!!!!!!!

Attached: 598742A9-7861-4E44-9A1E-76CA3240A747.jpg (250x205, 8.24K)

>a vara quer raba

Attached: 235.jpg (739x712, 176.62K)

Isn't making a spell that instantaneously kills people illegal redundant? Also, how is it worse than casting a giant anvil above someone's head? It seems relatively painless by comparison.

based

There’s no spell that creates anvils out of thin air, I thought all brits we’re familiar with Harry Potter

abra kedavra

The stick that wants to scrape?

>Pata de Cabra!

Attached: 1565606465164.jpg (1080x1350, 113.24K)

the stick wants the butt

>lavate las manos

Attached: 1584784343634.png (720x671, 263.05K)

KEK

After intense study, I've come to the conclusion that the Harry Potter setting makes no sense

Like, how come a bunch of muggles managed to hunt wizards? HP wizards are pretty much minor gods that can conjure a firestorm out of thin air, summon a army of corpes, wipe people's memories, kill people with a single word, enslaved others to your will, and only god knows what else

your average wizard is neville longbottom, not the likes of bellatrix or mcgonagall

Are you sure?

>muggles hunting wizards
i don't remember this

>Like, how come a bunch of muggles managed to hunt wizards?
purity of will

Attached: Anti-Mage_icon.png (256x144, 59.04K)

Sure, but the average muggle was a dumbfuck that couldn't fight properly too.
The few top wizards should be able to destroy entire nations by themselves.
I mean, the best a medieval muggle could do was to fire arrows and use blades agains't them.
I think there's only a few mentions of it in the books. It's the reason the wizards need to hide

Maybe they just got annoyed with killing muggles and decided to fuck off.

anti mage uses mana and is thus a mage himself

i was going to post this

Perhaps I'd want that spell used on me too, if I had the misfortune to exist in one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 1473063744424.jpg (1623x2886, 1.27M)

Why would you post that copypasta?

harry potter would be much cooler if there was antifa style wizard hunting anti-magic cult that zealously predates both the antagonist and the protagonist like a magic BLM.

no it wouldn't

There is though

I think the muggles had a pretty crazy numbers advantage even before being hunted.

>POTTER, IN MY OFFICE, NOW.
>DID YOU THINK I WOULDN'T HEAR ABOUT THAT LITTLE STUNT YOU PULLED IN THE CHAMBER OF SECRETS?
>THANKS TO YOU, I'VE GOT THE MINISTRY OF MAGIC SO FAR UP MY ASS MY PATRONUS IS NOW A GERBIL!

Attached: he said calmly.jpg (740x370, 56.22K)

>baby magic

Attached: f4cc6fc8d754d31ddcab7ecb312d28a7ec8125ea_hq.gif (500x250, 563.16K)

He said calmly

cringe

What the fuck do you even know about antifa and BLM in Indonesia

Ok, this has been driving me crazy for seven movies now, and I know you're going to roll your eyes, but hear me out: Harry Potter should have carried a 1911.

Here's why:

Think about how quickly the entire WWWIII (Wizarding-World War III) would have ended if all of the good guys had simply armed up with good ol' American hot lead.

Basilisk? Let's see how tough it is when you shoot it with a .470 Nitro Express. Worried about its Medusa-gaze? Wear night vision goggles. The image is light-amplified and re-transmitted to your eyes. You aren't looking at it--you're looking at a picture of it.

Imagine how epic the first movie would be if Harry had put a breeching charge on the bathroom wall, flash-banged the hole, and then went in wearing NVGs and a Kevlar-weave stab-vest, carrying a SPAS-12.
And have you noticed that only Europe seems to a problem with Deatheaters? Maybe it's because Americans have spent the last 200 years shooting deer, playing GTA: Vice City, and keeping an eye out for black helicopters over their compounds. Meanwhile, Brits have been cutting their steaks with spoons. Remember: gun-control means that Voldemort wins. God made wizards and God made muggles, but Samuel Colt made them equal.

Now I know what you're going to say: "But a wizard could just disarm someone with a gun!" Yeah, well they can also disarm someone with a wand (as they do many times throughout the books/movies). But which is faster: saying a spell or pulling a trigger?

Avada Kedavra, meet Avtomat Kalashnikova.

Imagine Harry out in the woods, wearing his invisibility cloak, carrying a .50bmg Barrett, turning Deatheaters into pink mist, scratching a lightning bolt into his rifle stock for each kill. I don't think Madam Pomfrey has any spells that can scrape your brains off of the trees and put you back together after something like that. Voldemort's wand may be 13.5 inches with a Phoenix-feather core, but Harry's would be 0.50 inches with a tungsten core. Let's see Voldy wave his at 3,000 feet per second. Better hope you have some Essence of Dittany for that sucking chest wound.

I can see it now...Voldemort roaring with evil laughter and boasting to Harry that he can't be killed, since he is protected by seven Horcruxes, only to have Harry give a crooked grin, flick his cigarette butt away, and deliver what would easily be the best one-liner in the entire series:

"Well then I guess it's a good thing my 1911 holds 7+1."

And that is why Harry Potter should have carried a 1911.

Attached: 1553348993743.jpg (1160x963, 379.13K)