There is no mtion in the 3 times.
where going has gone, there is no going any longer
where going has yet to go, there is not yet going
there is no motion in a given moment (The present), only what has been traversed and what is yet to be traversed.
/desi/- no politics allowed edition
Aiden Diaz
Lincoln Johnson
In general, I look down on both Turks and Kurds, they are both cringe. But Turkish diaspora in Europe is based, highly conservative and religious. Whereas Kurdish diaspora is also cringe. So I prefer Turks.
Sebastian Young
indians zoomers like yourself are fucking lame
go send joker face gifs over jio you imbecile
Christian Wright
Should have thrown you under a bigger glacier. Dont worry I'll do that the next time.
Luis Scott
Seething much? I'm 27 and I love spongebob.
Landon Wilson
Does a bundle of sticks share the quality of oneness with a single stick?
Or is oneness not an objective reality (ie numbers and the relations between them lacking essence) but instead an imputation onto reality to make sense of it?
Jaxson Phillips
Thoughts of chinks? Are you upset at them because of the wuhan virus
Caleb Ward
They are my country’s greatest ally in the Middle East so I am a little biased towards them. That being said I’m also a little apprehensive about supporting Marxist Leninist militias. I’ve never met Kurdish diaspora and the Turks I’ve met here in the states have been good people.
Ayden Jones
Perception (the sight) does not exist separately from the Perceiver (the seeing eye) and the Perceived (the seen stone).
The Perceiver (the seeing eye) does not exist separately from the Perception (the sight) and the Perceived (the seen stone)
The Perceied (the seen stone) does not exist separately from the Perception (the sight) and the Perceiver (the seeing eye).
If there were perception without perceiver and perceived. It would be a perception of what? and by whom?
If there were a perceiver without perception and perceived. It simply would not be a perceiver. If the seeing eye could see without an object of vision - it would see itself - but doesn't.
If there were a perceived without perception and perceiver. It simply would not be a perceived thing. . If the seen stone could be seen without an subject viewer - it would be seen by itself - but it isn't.
Thus outside of these relationally derived imputations of perception...., there is nothing to be perceived, nothing to perceive and nothing which is perception.
Robert Hall
Words cannot describe my contempt for the Chinese.