>A comparative sociological study of East and West Germans conducted after reunification in 1990 found that Eastern women had twice as many orgasms as Western women. Researchers marveled at this disparity in reported sexual satisfaction, especially since East German women suffered from the notorious double burden of formal employment and housework. In contrast, postwar West German women had stayed home and enjoyed all the labor-saving devices produced by the roaring capitalist economy. But they had less sex, and less satisfying sex, than women who had to line up for toilet paper.
>“As early as 1952, Czechoslovak sexologists started doing research on the female orgasm, and in 1961 they held a conference solely devoted to the topic,” Katerina Liskova, a professor at Masaryk University in the Czech Republic, told me. “They focused on the importance of the equality between men and women as a core component of female pleasure. Some even argued that men need to share housework and child rearing, otherwise there would be no good sex.”
>Agnieszka Koscianska, an associate professor of anthropology at the University of Warsaw, told me that pre-1989 Polish sexologists “didn’t limit sex to bodily experiences and stressed the importance of social and cultural contexts for sexual pleasure.” It was state socialism’s answer to work-life balance: “Even the best stimulation, they argued, will not help to achieve pleasure if a woman is stressed or overworked, worried about her future and financial stability.”
Tl;dr - under a planned, worker-owned economy, you have job security and shelter is a human right, and this is true for both men and women. Therefore, couples only stay together if they want to, and if they enjoy each other's romance.
Chad Pawel from communist Poland: >Hard work, shit pay, but there's job security >His apartment is guaranteed and he won't lose a roof over his head >His wife is with him cause she loves him, and they can easily afford kids >Bomb ass sex every night
pathetic Paul from the capitalist west: >knows he can be thrown out of his job any time, has a heart attack every time the market turns >if he loses his job his whole family will become homeless >his wife is dependent on him because only men are able to pursue careers with adequate pay in the west, but she secretly hates his guts and doesn't want any more kids than she's burdened with >can't fuck
isn't the intuitive answer to this that women were more physically active under socialism and thus had better bloodflow, more energy, and better hormonal balance?
Isaac Edwards
>Slavs fake stats to prove their delusions Every time
Robert Edwards
Reminder these are the same people who jailed biologists en masse and pushed lysenkoism.
Mason Richardson
No because there was also white-collar work in those countries
Wtf? This applies more to communist Hungary and other intermariums than the USSR, you guys were making women squirm at some point
Camden Wright
fuck these bullshit "studies" and the morons who fall for this crap
Aiden Hill
no argument
Brayden Price
nope, this is about eastern european communist countries, not the USSR itself, Stalin rolled back progressive gender reforms
Michael Anderson
When I said people I meant communist countries.
David Roberts
>better bloodflow
lel, never held a rake or a hoe in your hand did you... I can guarantee you that 8 hours of work at a kolhoz leaves you with just enough energy to lay back and down a bottle of vodka. But who knows, maybe that worked for commie men..
Kayden Price
but it sounds here like they're talking about sweeping averages, not physical labor or white collar labor specifically
even if white collar labor drags down their responses you are comparing that with westerners in the 1950s and 1960s where a lot of women spent all of their time at home
Jose Wood
well you're wrong anyway
Brayden Bennett
Because women were filled with big Georgian bullcocks all around the union and didn't have to settle for small slavic penises.
Aiden Bennett
tl;dr but if its real it makes sense. the same probably holds true today in modern west where women can fuck whoever they want without consequence. >woman 500 years ago was forced to marry some beta with a decent job and got honor killed if she fucked anyone else so she spent her entire life unsatisfied >woman today can make her own money and go fuck 5 gigachads in one day
once women truly take over the world they will simply genocide all betas and share the remaining 25% of chad males as sex slaves
Christopher Smith
who the fuck do you think made up most of the secretarial and bureaucratic office work?
Hunter Miller
with those looks he could have been a succesful hollywood actor, gained a lot of money and fucked lots of different women but he was cursed by being born in a communist state, doomed since the start
Oliver Clark
>Stalin rolled back progressive gender reforms it started with Lenin actually, Stalin finished it
Colton Hall
this is apocryphal american dogma, women 500 years ago were forced to marry the alpha farm owner, while beta "paid help" only hired rooms at the farm and got payed for work and no father gave off his daughter to a looser like that.
Brandon Morgan
Under economical freedom, women don't pick men because of money, they all flock to sexual Chads.
Henry Johnson
I'm not sure how many did spend their time at home, it was probably a middle class luxury to. But still, stress & dependency don't create good romance, according to sexologists.
You'll find race-cucking fetishes come from the tension of unequal racist societies, like the west
A big component is stress & security. These days, career professionals have to fight for 40 years straight to get a secure place in their career ladder. They have no time to relax, be intimate, let alone build a family.
On the other hand, trust fund babies born with a big pile of money under their ass can date, fuck and love freely, and indeed they do. You think those young people in Venice Beach have worse romantic lives than you? LOL. Also, they still end up preferring monogamy and almost everyone gets a long term partner. Thats what happens under economic freedom, @ Did Lenin start it? Regardless the soviet union was a pretty damn liberated place until the 1934 constitution. They had no homophobic laws and the press could freely write about sex, which was still outrageous in the west. Pic related is a soviet erotic alphabet book from 1931, before stalin properly gained power.
besides all the bread lines, general deficit of all goods, secret police, censorship, deportations and forced labor camps yeah life was pretty good huh
Jaxson Nguyen
Soviets had a better diet than Americans.
Cooper Gonzalez
>besides all the bread lines, general deficit of all goods, secret police, censorship, deportations and forced labor camps yeah life was pretty good huh
>Nooooooooooooooooooo we can't have a nuanced analysis of systems that aren't capitalist, recognising some of the benefits that were achieved and learning how to apply them, we have to believe the commerinos were all evil and american investors are the best!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yeah so under communism cunts not only have unlimited unbridled uncontested supreme sexual agency (they have that in democracy too nowadays) but the fact that they can independently cover their material needs enables them to be strong independent womyn that need no man
You cant without the complete picture. That's like killing half of the population and taking everything they own and then saying "hey, the rest of us have so much now!" and then a few years later the entire economy crashes to shit
Jeremiah Thomas
More importantly despite muh bread lines memes they had better diets.
Benjamin Barnes
lmao cunts can't experience romance that's a male fantasy perpetuated by Hollywood to trick simps and naive people. Especially can't have any kind of romance or proper affection when the two genders are engaging on equal grounds
Owen Ross
Did hollywood also trick Czechoslovakian sexologists from 1952 and Polish sociologists from 1989?
