When will chinese communist party die

>The cuckstamp HK flag is better
Haha. No.

>China was always there, in its 5000 years history

Attached: China-Five-Dynasties-Ten-Kingdoms.gif (346x370, 25.43K)

>122233410
>>China was always there, in its 5000 years history

Attached: threekingdoms.png (1000x704, 320.19K)

>China was always there, in its 5000 years history

Attached: 7b263c508490037da00946bbe1a6ec6f.jpg (700x675, 54.66K)

>different states of being Chinese
And?

>Kublai Khan
>first non-Han emperor
>When he moved his headquarters to Khanbaliq, also called Dadu, at modern-day Beijing, there was an uprising in the old capital Karakorum that he barely contained. Kublai's actions were condemned by traditionalists and his critics still accused him of being too closely tied to Han Chinese culture.
pretty han culture mate

When the people unironically become more socio-economically free and have a higher level of awareness of what the CCP actually is.

Remember, not a lot of people in China even know Tiananmen square happened.

It's likely your great great great grandchildren wont live to see a non CCP China. How does that prospect make you feel?

Attached: 1586237459506.jpg (1024x577, 48.88K)

>free and have a higher level of awareness of what the CCP actually is.
>Remember, not a lot of people in China even know Tiananmen square happened.
>bro trust me I know all about this country thousands of miles away
Why should the average chinese care about Tiananmen square anyway?

There was not a Chinese identity at the time. A person from Canton is as different from a person from Luoyang as Londoner is different from an Athenian in the 10th century

Half the time China was ruled by Xianbeic peoples

This isn’t true but the truth is much sadder. Almost everyone in the mainland knows about Tiananmen and think that, while it would have been great it succeeded, at least it was crushed decisively. 38 years of civil war followed by 30 years of Maoist stupidity and China was finally reforming with sane-ish leadership meant that people made and make excuses for stability.

Plus lots of rural people feel that the complaints of Tiananmen are “elitist” in the hierarchy of needs sense, ie while they starved cities enjoyed the benefits of continued food exports and now they want to blow everything up for “democracy”?

>A person from Canton is as different from a person from Luoyang as Londoner is different from an Athenian
False.

Attached: Devs1.jpg (2534x1752, 877.28K)

It’s a bit of an exaggeration but it’s not entirely untrue. For example when speaking Wu (Shanghainese) prior to the Republican era guoyu language reforms “外國人” (foreigner, lit outside country person) applied to people from the far north and far south. These sorts of sub national identities persisted and do persist.

The best Western analogy might be Ancient Greece or the Holy Roman Empire which had cultural concepts of “Greece” or “Germany”, but distinct regional identities that only started to disappear with modern state building.

what's the thingy on top of the Mongolian flag? I've seen it on Pictish inscriptions, and on shields of auxiliary tribes of Roman army.

Attached: notitia-dignitatum-peronet-lamy-facsimile-edition-09.jpg (2100x1400, 423.74K)

Yeah I just think his implying they're completely different races is asinine.

Are you blind? It's not the same symbol, Mongolian one is clearly a flame.

Race is an amorphous thing.

French and Germans are different ethnically, there is probably as much difference between northerners and southerners not to mention the thousands of small minorities in places like Guangxi or Yunnan. It’s just that those ethnic differences didn’t happen to line up with sovereign nation states but rather internal divisions during rebellion.

clearly

I beg to differ

No that's not what I meant

Then beg harder.