Could it be said that the Turkish man's rule was benevolent to the unwashed slavic and greek tribes located in Balkans...

No. That is why we kicked your ass. But I have to state that some buildings you left behind still look beautiful, but out of place.

I'd say it was the reverse.
Observe how the literacy rate of the balkans nearly matches the AH-Otto border even 30 years after independence.

Attached: abc.jpg (1200x1116, 330.46K)

What exactly did Turks contribute to the Eastern Mediterranean civilization except putting minarets on everything and claiming it as theirs while slowly stagnating into irrelevance and dooming the territories it ruled over? I honestly can't name one positive Turkish thing.

>raped for 500 years continuously
>we kicked your ass

jesus

otto was as exploitative as the others imperialists I'm not proud of them

Turkish rule to Slavs was definitely better than Russian rule to Slavs.

inb4 russian janny comes in

You realise that the based Magyars literally destroyed every piece of Soviet heritage after their "independence"?

Only some mosques you dumb faggot.

>Balkans lost 2/3rds of population
>Polish population quadrupled under Russian rule
Yeah tell us more about the horrible Russian rule.

katyn kurwa

>Balkans lost 2/3rds of population

Proofs?

>Polish population quadrupled under Russian rule

And they destroyed our economy so Poles had to move to America to survive. Not to mention they destroyed our cultural heritage and western mentality too.

But I live in a commie block. You are confusing us with the Poles.
Yes and you expelled all the educated people because if their religion.

pretty sure they had plenty of sexual slaves both male and female, forcing people to fight and die in your shit wars is far worse than making them pick cotton btw

You could have said they were inept if they ever tried to do anything other than levy religious taxes and take children.

Come on, what is the point of lying?

If you time traveled to 1400 and then went in early 1900, you won't be able to see a difference on the Balkan parts that were under Ottoman rule.

turks only know how to build mosques, steal food and kids from the balkan people to bleach their genes.

Based Beaner.

Attached: BIG IRON ZAPATA.png (1012x636, 1.11M)

Hmm.

Attached: 15078BA2-41E9-46A2-88E2-A321F8FFFA2C.jpg (600x452, 356.34K)

Wrong. Chattel slavery is evil because it denies humanity to the slave. Ottoman slavery was not chattel slavery and slaves had legal personhood

You mean Serbs couldn't set up schools in 30 years? Damn.

The picture is very disingenious. That's how Turks treated caucasian slaves. Westerners didn't even take Turkish slaves to begin with. Negros were treated much worse than in the West by the Turkish.

What are you trying to say? That living on flat land makes learning easier?
That there's a conspiracy between slovenian cartographers and slovenia is actually all flat, therefore your map comparison actually makes sense?

You think these areas were more advanced before German colonialisation? Are you fucking nuts, Ahmed?

That sparsely populated and rural regions always have lower literacy, especially in the pre modern or early modern era. Even in Norway or Switzerland.

He is trying to say that Slavs are dindus and they are the victims of the systematic oppression of geography.