Recent study showed the fact Yayoi and modern korean is not related

The OP picture is wrong but you are wrong too
Left girl is looks exactly YAMATO who is mix of jomon and yayoi but a not a pure Jomon or pureYayoi .

Right girl is Tungus mongol girl which is not to do with directly either of pure Yayoi or pure jomon.

AGSIN
Forget modern borderlines and the retarded meme Jomon-Yayoi dichotomy. That's not how it works.

The fact is, in prehistoric to ancient times Japonic peoples lived in the south of what is now Korean peninsula and north of what is now Kyushu, Japan. Those peoples, sharing Japonic language, culture, and genetics, were called Wa or Wa people (Wa-jin), the dominant ethnicity of Yayoi people. They are characterized by haplogroup O1b2a1, still dominant in Japan. They saw the archipelago between Korea and Kyushu as their realm so to speak, with their chiefdoms dotting there and interacting with each other. The interactions could be construed as a flow of people from Korea to Japan in the eye of modern people not familiar with this (a narrative Korea likes to trumpet to mislead) but they were Japonic peoples already distinct from others in the first place. This is why archaeological remains of them as well as descriptions about presence of Wa on the peninsula in ancient records from Japan, Korea, and China, are found. The peninsula Japonic societies however went into a decline in about the middle of the first millennium, and ceased to exist by the 7th century, while the island Japonic societies got more powerful and grew into Yamato, though they left a small genetic mark on Korea. And so, Korean are not Yayoi. They share part of Yayoi ancestry, but the distinctive appearance has more to do with their Tungusic heritage.

lol, you aren't Jomon

>00:54:57
why its always haplogroups? Like no other researcher gives a fuck about autosomal dna

I AM NOT WRONG:

1. I DID NOT STATE THAT THE MODEL ON THE LEFT IS «PURE YAYOI»; I STATED THAT SHE IS YAYOID —ID EST: OF YAYOI HERITAGE, WHICH IS TO CLAIM THAT HER ETHNICAL HERITAGE IS MAJORITARILY YAYOI.

2. THE YAMATO ARE A MIXTURE OF YAYOI, JOMON, AND EMISHI, BUT, AS A WHOLE, ARE PREDOMINANTLY YAYOI —ID EST: THE YAMATO ARE ETHNICALLY YAYOID.

3. THE EMISHI WERE TURANYANS WHO ARRIVED AT JAPAN, IN THE NORTH, VIA SIBERIA; THEREFORE, ETHNICALLY RELATED TO MONGOLS.

What the problem with Yayoi?
Ancient relationships of korea and Japan.

Kofun period - Wikipedia (Kofun period - Wikipedia)

QUOTE
Baekje and Silla sent their princes as hostages to the Yamato Japan court in exchange for military support.
King Muryeong of Baekjewas born in Kyushu of Japan as the child of a hostage in 462,and left a son in Japan who was an ancestor of the minor-noble Yamato no Fubito clan.
Fubito's relative (Takano no Niigasa) was a 10th-generation descendant of King Muryeong of Baekje who was chosen as a concubine for Emperor Kōnin and was the mother of Emperor Kanmu. In 2001, Emperor Akihito confirmed his ancient royal Korean heritage through Emperor Kanmu.
Baekjeand Silla sent their princes to the Wa Japan court as an hostage in exchange for military support to continue their already-begun military campaigns around 400.
the last king of Baekje (reigned 641-660), formed an alliance with Japan and made Prince Buyeo Pung and King Zenko stay there as their hostages. In 660, Baekje fell when it was attacked by Silla, who was in alliance with Tang China. Former generals of Baekje, including Gwisil Boksin, asked Japan to return Prince Buyeo Pung and asked military aid. In 663, Japan, supporting Baekje, was defeated by the allied forces of Silla and Tang China in the Korean Peninsula (the Battle of Baekgang), and the restoration of Baekje ended up in failure. While at the same time hostility between Japan and Silla escalated.
Japanese Empress Jitōhonored King Zenko by giving him the hereditary title of Kudara no Konikishi and allowed him to pass on his royal lineage to future generations.
Takano no Niigasa came from a background of the naturalized clansmen Yamato-no-Fumito and was a 10th-generation descendant of King Muryeong of Baekje. She was chosen as a wife for Japanese Emperor Kōnin and subsequently became the mother of Emperor Kanmu.

the Korean value slumped and ended when Chinese culture was introduced directly via Japanese missions to Tang China. Emperor Kanmu severed diplomatic relations with Silla in 799.

YAMATO is YAYOIC.
But problems here is that YAYOIC means nothing but a Japonic people from Yangtze. Who is origine of Japonic language ,Japonic Haplogroup , and Japonic rice farmers, which is not to do with modern korean who is Tungus sills add Han Chinese massacred those Japonic people in Korea.

Firstly, haplogroup O1b2a1(YAYOI JAPANESE )is originated in Yangtze.

Yangtze is not HAN chinese even not to do with yellow river civilization of china.
But a first Yayoi Japonic people from Yangtze is MIAO-MIEN MINORITY TRIBE add ancient Austronesian mixed asian which is rather similar to Vietnamese of now.
But Not a directly related modern korean.

O1b2a1 - Yayoi Japanese (Yangtze river civilization) [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_O-M176#O-47z]
JP: 24%
KR: 8%
>this meaning Yayoi and korean is not related strongly at all.

>Now, how you can say Yayoi and those Japonic people in ancient south Korea was the same of modern korean and chinese of now?(Modern korean DNA is showing they are Tungus Silla and Han Chinese who destroyed and massacred Beakje the Japonic people in korea.)

>If you are not functional illiteracy, you can understand this meaning well.

That’s all.

Attached: B1647EBB-660D-4C87-9F9E-6FDD08694B99.jpg (489x1159, 442.59K)

AGSIN
Forget modern borderlines and the retarded meme Jomon-Yayoi dichotomy. That's not how it works.

The fact is, in prehistoric to ancient times Japonic peoples lived in the south of what is now Korean peninsula and north of what is now Kyushu, Japan. Those peoples, sharing Japonic language, culture, and genetics, were called Wa or Wa people (Wa-jin), the dominant ethnicity of Yayoi people. They are characterized by haplogroup O1b2a1, still dominant in Japan. They saw the archipelago between Korea and Kyushu as their realm so to speak, with their chiefdoms dotting there and interacting with each other. The interactions could be construed as a flow of people from Korea to Japan in the eye of modern people not familiar with this (a narrative Korea likes to trumpet to mislead) but they were Japonic peoples already distinct from others in the first place. This is why archaeological remains of them as well as descriptions about presence of Wa on the peninsula in ancient records from Japan, Korea, and China, are found. The peninsula Japonic societies however went into a decline in about the middle of the first millennium, and ceased to exist by the 7th century, while the island Japonic societies got more powerful and grew into Yamato, though they left a small genetic mark on Korea. And so, Korean are not Yayoi. They share part of Yayoi ancestry, but the distinctive appearance has more to do with their Tungusic heritage.

THE ONLY PROBLEM THAT I SEE HERE IS THE VIRTUALLY ENDLESS GIBBERISH REGARDING HAPLOGROUPS, AND THE SEQUENT CONFUSION; HAPLOGROUPS ARE USELESS TO DETERMINE ETHNICITY, AND RACE.

arr rook same
thread\

You are a Han-Abo mutt, end of story.

Lsnguge, record of war, and even DNA analysis of japonica rice itself and it’s roots suggesting and supporting this theory.
If you say that, try to logically counter argue by other source.
You are fucking loser dog of the argument

Bytheway I’m Zainichi korean myself but I still support this theory
Modern korean is clearly showing the roots of Tungus Mongolian add Han chineee even from its face,Body and mentality.
This is PSY most common face among of koreans.
This is exactly the face of South Mongolians.

Attached: C14EF3F6-8873-41EB-8806-CA6538B05605.jpg (300x400, 13.6K)

why are Japanese posts always so high quality

Is soooooo Ironic but Jomon is Haplogroup D which is originated came from Lake Baikal later became native Americans ,Siberian and Jomon Japanese.

And sooooo irony but YAYOI is south Chinese minorities of Mian tribe which is RATHER RELATED AOUSTRANESIAN ABOS MORE THAN JOMOM.
Realiy is always shocking,

So even from this fact , modern korean who is descendant of Tungus mingol and Han,is not related Yayoi.

A recent study (2018) shows that the Japanese are predominantly descendants of the Yayoi people and are closely related to other modern East Asians, especially Koreans and Han Chinese.[89][90] It is estimated that the majority of Japanese only has about 12% Jōmon ancestry or even less.[91]

Recent studies suggest that the Japanese people are predominantly descendants of the Yayoi people, and that the Yayoi largely displaced the local Jōmon.[92]

A genome research (Takahashi et al. 2019) shows that modern Japanese (Yamato) do not have much Jōmon ancestry at all. Nuclear genome analysis of Jōmon samples and modern Japanese samples show strong differences.[63]

i am jomonese

YAMATO is YAYOIC.
But problems here is that YAYOIC means nothing but a Japonic people from Yangtze. Who is origine of Japonic language ,Japonic Haplogroup , and Japonic rice farmers, which is not to do with modern korean who is Tungus sills add Han Chinese massacred those Japonic people in Korea.

Firstly, haplogroup O1b2a1(YAYOI JAPANESE )is originated in Yangtze.

Yangtze is not HAN chinese even not to do with yellow river civilization of china.
But a first Yayoi Japonic people from Yangtze is MIAO-MIEN MINORITY TRIBE add ancient Austronesian mixed asian which is rather similar to Vietnamese of now.
But Not a directly related modern korean.

O1b2a1 - Yayoi Japanese (Yangtze river civilization) [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_O-M176#O-47z]
JP: 24%
KR: 8%
>this meaning Yayoi and korean is not related strongly at all.

>Now, how you can say Yayoi and those Japonic people in ancient south Korea was the same of modern korean and chinese of now?(Modern korean DNA is showing they are Tungus Silla and Han Chinese who destroyed and massacred Beakje the Japonic people in korea.)

>If you are not functional illiteracy, you can understand this meaning well.

That’s all.

But in the end, does it really even matter?

>Haplogroup D which is originated came from Lake Baikal later became native Americans ,Siberian and Jomon Japanese
take your meds, nobody gonna believe your sourceless made up fact.

Attached: 1558397621156.jpg (114x125, 2.69K)

YOUR RESPONSE IS A NON SEQVITVR —IT DOES NOT RELATE TO ANYTHING THAT I POSTED.