Is there a continent more irrelevant than this?

Most irrelevant are both Africa and Oceania

OP, you're fucking retard btw

>Africa
Lol no. Africa is very resource rich.

So is South America

i swear to GOD int has been obsesed with us for the last 6 months or so
just fucking leave us alone ffs

Attached: 1565371448696.png (829x633, 338.22K)

Yeah but Africa is definitely more relevant than your shithole of a continent.

America is one continent, dumb niggers

>irrelevant BAD

Attached: d31.png (600x687, 36.55K)

oceania is more relevant

According to your logic, is more relevant than Asia and North America as well. And South America would be more relevant than Europe
What's relevant about Oceania?

>latin america
>continent
What did he mean by this?

unironically oceania and africa LMAFO

based! fuck spics! They are all subhumans (except for me ofc)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_Australian_inventions

Attached: science-output.png (640x320, 113.09K)

Well if Latin America never existed in the first place, European colonization would never take off as it did, and Europe would remain a marginalized sector of the global economy.

Australia on the other hand may as well not exist.

Wow africa is so tiny.

People talk about africa 10 million times more than they do about south america.

sp*cs need to be exterminated & replaced with pure blooded japs

Attached: 920ed8e9e648aa684e41e99bd3a71be1.jpg (640x569, 70.18K)

brazil*ans are african.

Attached: main-qimg-08ab7f20dd15faf3246ba41ace1faecf.png (772x596, 425.04K)

>People talk about africa 10 million times more than they do about south america.

That's because they're a bigger shit hole and cause more problems.

>unironically oceania and africa LMAFO
They have more relevance though
Just because they are poor
>Most irrelevant are both Africa and Oceania
>>People talk about africa 10 million times more than they do about south america.
>That's because they're a bigger shit hole and cause more problems.
They are less violent tho

Tbh when I think about "relevancy", I think about the influence/fame of the culture, but that's a fair point
Talk about what exactly? About african cinema, cuisine, culture, nature, or "poor africa so poor"? Genuine question.
Chicanos are mentally ill

NEW AFRIKA (brazil) is worster than africa

Attached: brazilians.jpg (2048x1365, 194.42K)

antarctica proly

Im jomon

Maybe they are, I'd rather live in a criminals infested country like Brazil, than these countries in Africa that go to civil war one time every decade.

They are "less violent" because they can't even afford drugs, let them uga boogas discover cocaine and you will see the hell in earth

True, pure negros are less violent. Brazilian pardo mongrels NEED to be exterminated ASAP

You need to have a social life

>They are less violent tho
violence in these regions is underreported

>Talk about what exactly? About african cinema, cuisine, culture, nature, or "poor africa so poor"? Genuine question.
'Africa is so poor'
No one talks about Latin America because there is nothing to talk about other than warzone tier murders
No one gives a shit about the culture and you guys don't produce any good cinema

>No one gives a shit about the culture and you guys don't produce any good cinema
My point is that I rather be irrelevant than relevant for the reasons Africa is talked about

>Maybe they are, I'd rather live in a criminals infested country like Brazil, than these countries in Africa that go to civil war one time every decade.
Most African countries aren't warzones
I'd rather live in Namibia or Botswana than in Brazil
I won't get shanked

You must be a retarded If you think I was implying South American cinema is relevant

Africans are more peaceful. KYS pardo muttoid

Attached: d0802fdbf48370c3fa9870ab0cabee5c.jpg (525x700, 74.42K)

>botswana's hdi is 0,728
Better than what I thought, but I wouldn't like to live there

What's up with chicanos and
>MEXICHAD [random ethnicity]/OLMEC CHAD/ MAYAN CHAD
>posting this pic talking about dominicans/puerto ricans/colombians/brazilians
>trying to pass as mongoloids
>autistically obsessed with blacks
Why do they all follow this schizoid kind of posting

m8 there aren't even statistics for africa, pretty sure daily genocides occur on the daily in the depths of africa without anyone ever finding out

If we thoroughly study the racial nature of the latinx, we conclude that latinx is not a race in the ordinary sense of the word. Instead, as Houston Steward Chamberlain wrote, it must be seen as a counter-race, although the term “counter-race” cannot be understood in a biological sense. From a biological standpoint, latinxism is a stable, inbred mixture of extreme races and racial rubbish. The concept of “counter-race” primarily means the destructive and disruptive effect of latinxism within natural races. The distinguishing mark of latinxism within human races has to do on the one hand with the racial makeup of the latinx, who have been scattered for 500 yrs, and on the other hand in their stubborn adherence to the crassest materialism, based on their so-called catholic laws.

Latinxism is the result of the mixing of every possible race. It is the biggest racial mish-mash in history. This racial mish-mash is so dangerous for all peoples because it because it includes elements from every race. The bad characteristics of these races have been passed on for many generations through latinxism in ever stronger form. From this artificial, rootless, materialistic racial mish-mash, a parasitic counter-race has developed among the peoples.

The core of latinx is the coming together of rootless, rejected, asocial, sick, and degenerate elements of the various races, predominately of injuns, med swarthoids and negro origins.

Attached: 640px-Ronaldo.jpeg.jpg (640x742, 78.31K)