the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is one of the largest donors to the World Health Organization (WHO) and paid it more than $200 million in 2018 – more than Germany, France and Sweden combined in the same period. But this is not the only way in which the WHO is financed by Gates. GAVI, formerly known as the “Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation”, provided the WHO with an additional $150 million in 2018. One of GAVI’s main donors is again the BMGF, with $1.5 billion in 2016, for example.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is one of the largest donors to the World Health Organization (WHO) and paid it...
Juan Campbell
Other urls found in this thread:
towardsdatascience.com
twitter.com
Ian White
...
Aaron Price
Follow the money trail, find the culprit.
Jason Roberts
>rich guy wants to prevent pandemics because it kills profits worldwide
>gee that means he actually wants to kill us and inject satanic microchips into our body!
Colton Martin
>>rich guy wants to prevent pandemics because it kills profits worldwide
I doubt it. He's given most of his money away and doesnt work in business anymore
Benjamin Foster
Bill Gates was a close associate of Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein was obsessed with "seeding" the entire world with his DNA. The coronavirus vaccine, developed by the Bill And Melinda Gates Foundation, will include the DNA of Jeffrey Epstein in order to realize his ambitions.
Elijah Myers
Bastard
Jaxon Fisher
I guess it was also the Gates foundation that paid people to pretend to have critical respiratory problems and swarm hospitals, old people to die in retirement homes, and the number of deaths to jump compared to other years at the same time of year.
Luis Nguyen
yes.
Juan Brown
>the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is one of the largest donors to the World Health Organization (WHO) and paid it more than $200 million in 2018 – more than Germany, France and Sweden combined in the same period. But this is not the only way in which the WHO is financed by Gates. GAVI, formerly known as the “Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation”, provided the WHO with an additional $150 million in 2018. One of GAVI’s main donors is again the BMGF, with $1.5 billion in 2016, for example.
Kayden Clark
this is the same "university" that claimed most of the population was infected in california which turned out ot be bullshit
americans conservatives should be trialed in the haag for genocide
Joseph Rivera
The WHO supports circumcision.
Parker Smith
>which turned out ot be bullshit
[citation needed]
Mason Peterson
Wasnt Stanford supposed to be on par with Harvard?
Alexander Rodriguez
They tested the population in Germany and Northern Italy and the infected populated doesn't exceed 15%
Grayson Nelson
whats that have to do with california
Jose Thompson
There's no fucking way the situation in California is much worse.
Austin Turner
0.2% of the west is 2 million white people dead you faggot.
Gavin Cook
the USA has double anybody else amount tested, there is absolutely no way they tested a significant portion of those countries population.
Easton Hughes
>pandemics
they hyped this "pandemic"
Julian Clark
That's not how it works you dumbo.
They tested random people for antibodies.
Julian Peterson
post a link to whatever study you're referencing
Jace Morgan
Wow! Old people die in retirement homes when the staff leaves them alone for several days? Could have fooled me.
Luke Perry
>west
>white people
50 years ago
Ian Green
So... What?
Robert Ross
Ryder Sullivan
The staff haven't fled.
Camden Ross
>Criticism was voiced that there is only one test that can reliably detect COVID-19 antibodies and at the same time does not react to other, harmless corona viruses. However, no information on the test used has been provided from the interim results [5]
Mason Parker
That would have made the results higher, not lower.
Evan Nguyen
Yes, it would mean that more of the population was infected like the OP's study implies.
Brandon Ward
Just so all of you know, the source for this is GlobalResearch
Ethan Green
Wut no?
If the test used in the experiment reacted to antibodies to other coronaviruses the number of infected people in the village is overestimated
Elijah Murphy
both equally jewish good for nothing circlejerks
Chase Nelson
>If the test used in the experiment reacted to antibodies to other coronaviruses the number of infected people in the village is overestimated
I'm not sure where you confusion is coming from but I'll post it again in case you misread.
>Criticism was voiced that there is only one test that can reliably detect COVID-19 antibodies and at the same time does not react to other,
Meaning it does not react to the majority of corona cases (hence why it isn't being used regularly to detect the virus)
Joseph Robinson
>There is only one test that can reliably detect COVID-19 antibodies and at the same time does not react to other, harmless corona viruses
This means that tests often have false positives because they react to other coronaviruses, such as that of the common cold.