Reminder Germanics destroyed this because they're absolute barbarians

Whole squad full of fucking killers, I'm a killer too

Attached: 1541622480146.jpg (834x554, 51.97K)

Milan makes perfect sense as the capital.

Do I look like a little bitch who needs weapons?? I’m 190, lean. None of my fights left the 2nd round excluding my last when I fought while injured, mate. You wouldn’t stand a chance on your feet, and you’d better be a damn good wrestler, because I’ve also got a bit of ground game.

Aren't Portuguese basically Visigoths and Suebii mixed a bunch with shitty pagan Lusitanian tribes

>poke the germanicvs bvll for centuries
>enslave them so you can watch them get raped by chimps and lions
>they get tired of your shit
>collapse your pitiful "civilization" in a few decades of peaceful migrations
>2000 years later and swarthoid "civilization" hasn't recovered.

Attached: 1547886007798.png (1125x1378, 115.63K)

Weight? And what do you practice. Tbh I'm only 184cm and blue belt in JJ but I'll take those odds.

>Waaaaaaaaa only Romanaroos can conquer foreign peoples
>Those evil germans can't do the same shit
>those idiots aren't even stripping all the local wealth and sending it back to Germania

>only we are allowed to steal and rape

Attached: efff.jpg (480x360, 19.52K)

Shut the fuck up you germshit fuck

If they actually bothered to pay their mercenaries maybe their cities wouldn't have gotten sacked every few decades.
Or even better, could have stopped being lazy scum and actually defended their empire by themselves instead of murdering eachother.

Tell me the culture and tradition Germanics destroyed of the land they conquered, did they prevent the Christians from getting on their knees and being sodomized by a priest?

Franco-Anglo-Saxon mutt checking in. Ooga-booga, where the Med women at??

Did the Germanics end Christian civilization that is invented by worshiping the Jewish Bible and church?
No, the church existed the same with the Christian Germanics that became the new land Lords, Rome died with Constantine.

>Rome died with one of the greatest reformers that reintroduced a sense of stability in Roman politics and made the military more efficient at defending its borders
Nice meme bro. If anything you could only argue that the principate died with Diocletian, and that's unironically a good thing if the Crisis of the Third Century is anything to go by. But of course repeating Yas Forums memes is easier.

>>Rome died with one of the greatest reformers that reintroduced a sense of stability in Roman politics and made the military more efficient at defending its borders

Constantine included continuous tension and civil war as well as tension and collapse of all institutions.

By the time Western Roman Empire was collapsing Germanics were basically fighting other Germanics like Stilicho or Ricimer.

>Constantine included continuous tension and civil war
He came to power in a civil war, then ended those civil wars from popping up for a considerable amount of time by making the Tetrarchy a dynastic succession system, kneecapping the system of soldier-emperors.

>collapse of all institutions
>all
Wow, I didn't know that the Roman Empire literally collapsed under Constantine. I mean, every single institution collapsed didn't it? Or are you talking about some of the old and unwieldy institutions being ended or transformed? You know, reforms? Because Rome just came out of a bloody period where emperors were being constantly assassinated, overthrown or confronted with pretenders who rose up in civil war?

milan became the capital cuz rome needed the political center closer to the front, when the front collapsed and everything was going downhill, they changed it to ravenna which was easier to defend, but also signaled that rome has become even weaker
you forgot moors too
it was many factors that led to the fall of rome, not just germanics "getting tired of your shit"
well not paying mercenaries has happened in many stages of rome history, but by the end of the empire they COULDNT pay, vandals going through spain which was the last tax giver to western rome got cut off and then they got to north africa which cut off the grain and more tax, tho rome did fuck up by not taking Alarics peace deal in 410, which led to the sack of rome, i will never understand what they were thinking, alaric basically said "just give us grain so we dont starve and let us defend your territory for you from other germanics" and rome said "lol nope" and got sacked, fucking idiots, i blame it on racism
the germanics that destroyed rome were christians themselves, during one battle romans and germans didnt fight cuz it was easter, so the romans asked alanian pagan to be the general, also during the 410 sack all churches were spared and the people in them, and alaric even said before sack "go to churches if you want to live"
christian germanics destroyed christian rome and then those christian germanics created christian kingdoms and destroyed pagan germanics later

Constantine fought against the Roman religion the Roman culture the Roman tradition the Roman gods and the Roman institutions which makes him the anti-roman the destroyer of Rome.

>you could only argue that the principate died with Diocletian
there is nothing to argue, its a fact, diocletian replaced principate with dominate

>milan became the capital cuz rome needed the political center closer to the front
This. The four capitals effectively became the home bases for the Caesars, Augusti and their personal armies (comitatenses). The Western Augustus being based in Milan allowed him to not only defend Italia from invasions from the north, but quickly reinforce Illyria to the East if need be, or quickly march into Gaul to assist the Western Caesar in Trier.

The Tetrarchy not only created a clear system of succession that the Principate always lacked, but also changed Rome's military strategy to that of a defensive line with powerful reserve armies ready to reinforce breaches or destroy enemies that managed to slip through the lines. It was the perfect solution for the problems Rome faced at the time.

ok retard

Christians should take pride in being anti-roman their God and religion was oppressed by the Roman nation, their nation is one of judea, Israel and Hebrews not romans or hellenes.

This. Various germanic tribes had already settled accross all the western empire and controlled it in all intents and purposes.
While the Eastern Empire was occupied by gr*eks and orientoids which isn't really better

Killing Rome was the goal of Christians and Christianity no?
And making the hebrew ways rather than the Latin ones the only ways.

When Rome became Christian
Rome stopped existing as Rome was defined by Roman religion and traditions/culture which Christianity is not as it's a Jewish/Hebrew religon

>Killing Rome was the goal of Christians and Christianity no?
....no. Where the fuck did you even get that idea? Serious question, I want you to point out what doctrine or church tradition included "destroy Rome".

>And making the hebrew ways rather than the Latin ones the only ways.
Except the grand majority weren't Hebrews and the Jews hated Christians. The Bar Khokba revolt saw Jews slaughtering Pagans and Christians alike until they were finally expelled.

Seriously, stop getting your historical information from Yas Forums.

Reminder that Slavic tribes helped cause the tension between Romans and Germanics as Slavs taking on more land pushed the Germanics westward and they were scared of Slavic chads.

Also a reminder, Germanics were always cucks who assimilated and got absorbed into everyone elses cultures.

>Ultimately, the Germanic groups in the Western Roman Empire were accommodated without "dispossessing or overturning indigenous society", and they maintained a structured and hierarchical (but attenuated) form of Roman administration. Ironically, they lost their unique identity as a result of such an accommodation and were absorbed into Latinhood. In contrast, in the east, Slavic tribes maintained a more "spartan and egalitarian" existence bound to the land "even in times when they took their part in plundering Roman provinces". Their organizational models were not Roman, and their leaders were not normally dependent on Roman gold for success. Thus they arguably had a greater effect on their region than the Goths, the Franks or the Saxons had on theirs.

You can't assimilate the slav or erase the slav spirit. SOUL

>Roman religion and traditions/culture
LARPing as Greeks?

What are you talking about, the Franks and their successors kept the Roman Empire alive until 1806!