Yayoi are the ethically Korean looking group, right?
I assume the samurai were joman. The joman people resemble us Turks I've noticed
Apparently Japanese people are mostly yayoi
Levi Jones
Other urls found in this thread:
discovermagazine.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.m.wikipedia.org
en.m.wikipedia.org
en.m.wikipedia.org
en.m.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Christian Nelson
>97% Yayoi
lmao. This is even worse than those Paki Aryan LARPers. At least Pakis are 30-40% Indo-Aryan on average.
Brody King
I thought yayoi was the one they didn't want to be
Michael Myers
So even the most jomon yamato are only 20% jomon? African Americans are whiter than japs are jomon lmao
Nolan Powell
I remember reading this study and they counted people with massive amounts of jomon ancestry as yayoi, people like pic related.
Mason Miller
>us Turks
You are a greek-caucasian-turkic rape baby, nobody can "resemble you", since you are a secondary creature.
Easton Jones
Most Turks I know look like the above pic.
As for myself personally, I don't look like that, I look Germanic due to Balkan Albanian genes. Turks looks can vary, true
Easton Watson
Forget modern borderlines and the retarded Yas Forums meme Jomon-Yayoi dichotomy. That's not how it works.
The fact is, in prehistoric to ancient times Japonic peoples lived in the south of what is now Korean peninsula and north of what is now Kyushu, Japan. Those peoples, sharing Japonic language, culture, and genetics, were called Wa or Wa people (Wa-jin), the dominant ethnicity of Yayoi people. They are characterized by haplogroup O1b2a1, still dominant in Japan. They saw the archipelago between Korea and Kyushu as their realm so to speak, with their chiefdoms dotting there and interacting with each other. The interactions could be construed as a flow of people from Korea to Japan in the eye of modern people not familiar with this (a narrative Korea likes to trumpet to mislead) but they were Japonic peoples already distinct from others in the first place. This is why archaeological remains of them as well as descriptions about presence of Wa on the peninsula in ancient records from Japan, Korea, and China, are found. The peninsula Japonic societies however went into a decline in about the middle of the first millennium, and ceased to exist by the 7th century, while the island Japonic societies got more powerful and grew into Yamato, though they left a small genetic mark on Korea. And so, Korean are not Yayoi. They share part of Yayoi ancestry, but the distinctive appearance has more to do with their Tungusic heritage.
Jordan Roberts
Oh, so the yayoi people were already genetically distinct to proto-koreans even before they arrived in Japan?
So both jomon and yayoi are original japonica people's, jomon were just in Japan for longer
Christian Cox
Yes. That’s true.
Kayden Mitchell
Based jap. I respect your culture good sir. Honorary Aryans.
Chase Barnes
>t.dogeater in australia
Zachary Wood
You do realise that Koreans don't even make up 1% of the Australian population. Even Chinese are under 4%
Juan Gray
>Honorary Aryans
cringe
Charles Taylor
Well explained here discovermagazine.com
Read this
Luke Carter
Interesting
Julian Brown
Yayoi and korean is not related in DNA.
O1b2a1 - Yayoi Japanese (Yangtze river civilization) [en.wikipedia.org
JP: 24%
KR: 8%
>this meaning Yayoi and korean is not related strongly at all.
Aiden Brooks
About Origins of Yayoi.
Origine of majority of Yayoi is Yangtze people.
Yangtze people has own Yangtze civilization which is not Han or Tungus mongol.
They became later majorities of Yayoi Japanese, Beakje korean , miáozú tribe in china and some of south East Asian like vitnam.
en.m.wikipedia.org
Yangtze People and Yangtze civilization which is origins of yayoi is not even Han Chinese but more similar to minority tribe of miáozú tribe and some Of south East Asian.
And even ancient Baekje (ancient southern Korea) was Yangtze people as well.
So ancient japanese and ancient Beakje was ally and fight against ancient Silla and Tang china which is Tungus and Han people.
And this is the reason Tungus Silla destroyed Beakje complitely and many Beakje people escape to japan which the same tribe Yayoi (Southern Chinese Yangtze tribe) is living in japan.
en.m.wikipedia.org
And this is the reason japaponic language is not Tungus like modern korean based on Silla the Tungus.
Japonic language is came from Yangtze civilization which is not a Han.
Japanese is mostly mix of Jomon add Yangtze people which is not a Han (Ancient asian who was in Southern part of China ) and add some later coming Han .
Korean and chinese is mostly mix of Tungus mongol add Han tribe.
Offcouse it will be different.
A study conducted in 2017 by Ulsan University in Korea presented evidence that the genetic origin of Koreans is closer to that of southeast Asians.[9] This was additionally supported by Japanese research conducted in 1999 that supported the theory that the origin of the Yayoi people was in southern China near the Yangtze river.[10] This study further supports the already accepted admixture theory between the Jōmon and Yayoi populations.
en.m.wikipedia.org
Liam Robinson
>Honorary Aryans.
OH NONONO
Austin Carter
>Excerpts from THE Guns, Germs, and Steel of all books, the book laughed at by experts from around the world for flimsy observation and argument as well as the blatant agenda behind it
Adrian Cook
So from what I understand the Yayoi lived in Kyushu while the Jomon lived in the rest of Japan right? They speak Japonic languages but genetically different from each other?
Aaron Young
This article was obviously written by a zainichi korean
John Ward
Yangtze Civilization is origin of Japonic people. Yayoi and wa jin in korea , Beakje ad Kaya.
You can read even wiki page about Yayoi.
Yangtze is origine of those Yayoi and Japonic people in Korea.
In this modern age, we are saying "JAPONIC", but it’s basically "Yangtzic" so korean must not be angry react by this word japonic.
Because it’s simple, the rice which South Korea and Japanese is eating is JAPONICA RICE and it’s came from Yangtze By the analysis of DNA of japonica rice.
en.m.wikipedia.org
So it’s simple but Yayoi and those ancient korean who was making japonica rice in Korea was all Japonic people from Yangtze.
And they were all speaking Japonic language,
Yamato Japan anf Beakje,Kaya was all Japonic people , So that were faithful ally each other and fight against Silla korea (Tungus mongol) TANG China ally army.
And Beakje was lost by Silla
and all of those Japonic Beakje went to japan include royal family of Beakje. Because Yayoi was the same Japonic tribe who speak Japonic language as the same of Beakje.
Nathan Perry
What Jomon was speaking was similar of ainu language.
It’s different from Japonic language which Yayoi ,Beakje ,Kaya and wa jin in korea was speaking.
Origine of those Japonic people is from Yangtze, who speak Japonic language ,
Eating japonica rice (What korean and Japanese is eating even now),
And has Japonic Haplogroup O1b2a1.
So this is very clear.
Gavin Richardson
So they're just chinese in denial after all
Levi James
Yangtze is not Han chinese.
Han Chinese destroyed Yangtz civilization and they went to japan as Yayoi, went korea as Beakje and Kaya,
With japonica rice and Japonic language with Japonic haplogroup O1b2a1.
They are all Wajin(Japonic people.)
Mason Myers
>Estimated average of 97%
So basically 100%
Kek
Joseph Lopez
Yayoi and Modern korean is not related in DNA.
#
O1b2a1 - Yayoi Japanese (Yangtze river civilization) [en.wikipedia.org
JP: 24%
KR: 8%
>this meaning Yayoi and korean is not related strongly at all.
Aaron Miller
YAMERO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I dont wanna hear u!!
I don't wanna hear u!!!
I don't wanna hear u!!!!
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Camden King
Origine of those Japonic people is from Yangtze, who speak Japonic language ,
Eating japonica rice (What korean and Japanese is eating even now),
And has Japonic Haplogroup O1b2a1.
So this is very clear.
Daniel Torres
So if the yayoi aren't Korean, and they aren't Chinese? Then what are they? Which group do they cluster with most outside of modern Japan?
The yayoi obviously share no genetic similarity with jomon, so which group are they closest to?