Literally the only asian character in Harry Potter

you are saying like it was a bad thing

>she is antisemitic too

Sauce on this?

i miss when i was 15 years old and i had no responsibilities and i was just sitting home reading Harry Potter

Attached: 1410490011504.jpg (535x577, 61.43K)

>Harry Potter

Attached: serveimage (1).png (640x677, 129.48K)

>reading
>not watching

Attached: 1587059951972.png (502x694, 116.27K)

She a qtee though, remember fancying her as a kid.

the huwhite woman fear the samurai

All I know is that JK Rowling makes trannies seethe.

Attached: 1532223654499.jpg (1125x1169, 95.37K)

She wants chinks to fuck off. Harry Potter is for transexual bi-racial people that like to rub dicks together.

>Ching chong and ching chang chong are pejorative terms sometimes employed by speakers of English to mock or play on the Chinese language, people of Chinese ancestry, or other East Asians or Southeast Asians perceived to be Chinese. Several public commentators have characterized the term as derogatory, noting that assaults or physical intimidation of East Asians are often accompanied by racial slurs or imitation Chinese.[1][2]

Attached: 1586371853076.jpg (600x600, 248.08K)

She's not a self-aware little englander, tho. She goes around thinking she has a great understanding of foreign cultures and traditions while pulling off dumb shit like this and the whole Mahōtokoro and friends.

Tbh my dick got hard for the first time in my life when i saw they are kissing

That's all middle class folk

B
A
S
E
D

>Finland cannot read
Her name is Cho Chang.

Attached: 10335.jpg (192x192, 13.75K)

Aren't chang and ching unironic chinese names? The fuckers mock themselves kek

>dick got hard for the first time in >2007
underage ban

*RING RING RING RING*

Attached: 1583280716912.png (406x596, 136.97K)

Its expected to have the most generic, stereotypical characterization in the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: dullest.jpg (1565x2823, 2.76M)

>asoiaf and lotr in shit-tier
i would love to beat the living shit out of the elitist prick who made that bs image

It really is a shame that Harry Potter threads must always elicit the dullest pasta in the history of Yas Forums memes. Seriously each version bashing the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from its half-assed nature, the pasta’s only consistency has been its lack of originality and ineffective use of the accompanying image, all to make the humor humorless, to make creativity seem undesirable.

Perhaps the die was cast when the underage faggots poo-pooed the idea of creating any original content; they made sure the pasta would never be mistaken for a work of originality that meant anything to anybody - just a ridiculously bland guarantee of (You)s. The pasta might be anti-Semitic (or not), but it’s certainly anti-Baneposting in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the first time was clever
"Brap!"

The writing is dreadful; the pasta was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time someone replied to the pasta, the word “based!” was used.

I began marking on the back of a Harry Potter DVD every time that word was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the DVD several dozen times. I was incredulous. Yas Forums’s mind is so governed by cliches and dead memes that it has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of the pasta by Stefan Molyneux. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading this pasta at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to listen to my rhetoric." And he was quite right. He really was making an argument. When you read this pasta you are, in fact, trained to reply to this post or your mother will die in her sleep.

Based dullposter

Oh no no no. I liked Gayman.

Attached: Screenshot_2020-04-20-16-23-04-189_org.mozilla.firefox.jpg (1080x1920, 612.83K)

>LotR
>shit

Shant be taking that seriously then. It's just as valuable as 1984.

Truly ebin

Attached: 1.jpg (852x480, 23.81K)

I enjoyed Sandman. It was pretty creative.

twitter.com/BlastCero/status/1250678027652001797

based