>tfw you realize no language is mutually understable with english
Tfw you realize no language is mutually understable with english
Other urls found in this thread:
Scots and Appalachian.
No languages are mutually understandable. If it's the case, they basically are dialects of a language.
afrikaans is with dutch tbqh
spanish and portuguese are somewhat understandable
english is mutually intelligible with american
Slavic languages often are, like Polish/Belarussian or Polish/Sorbian
Frisian
This.
Especially if they have the same alphabet too.
Also Dutch (written at least) is understandable to someone who knows both English and German.
Regional dialects of dutch
Dialects of Latin, along with Italian and Catalan
closest is french ngl
true tbqh
>a language is a dialect with an army and a navy
However, modern English and Frisian are not mutually intelligible, nor are Frisian languages intelligible among themselves, due to independent linguistic innovations and foreign influences.
Not languages.
>Dialects of Latin
Based
A dialect of Dutch
You can understand a language or you cannot at all, i.e. you can't use it. It's like 56% white meme. There are similarities indeed because languages have a common ancestor, that's all.
>Appalachian
Holy based
As someone who lives in a French speaking country this is not true. Can't understand a thing those bastards say.
i can read Wikipedia in Sorbian but couldn't tell anything
If you are able to write in this language without major grammatical errors, I'm wrong and defeated then.
i can't write or speak, only read
if a Sorbian can read in Polish this would mean that these language are mutualy understable
Afrikaans is by south-african law not a dialect of dutch. Otherwise my little country of 17 million people would have about 50 million speakers and i refuse to believe this.
Yes, maybe. But I'd say If a Sorbian and Polish had a conversation in their respective languages without big troubles, the languages would be mutually understandable.
>all languages are dialects of Pre-Diluvian
aren't russian and polish like 90% intelligible with ukrainian and belarussian?
I feel like that's a good dividing line. Portuguese and Spanish better fit into lines of mutual intelligibility than how they look or necessarily developed. Portuguese and Spanish are dialects of Hispanian and if Portuñol were regulated it should be known formally as Standard Hispanian. Same could be said for the Northern Germanic languages, Swedish, Norwegian, Faroese and Danish could all be dialects of a reconstructed and regulated Standard Norse with relative ease.
Belorussian and Ukrainian are dialects of Russian influenced by Polish.
Afrikaans is Dutch slang from 100 years ago.
I think most european languages have some mutual intelligibility to each other, like at least 25%-50% lexical similarity.
Scots
This. It's just old Zeeuws.
You could blend every Germanic, Romance, Slavic language into European by using the most used PIE root for each word and blending the cognates, and if they’re all different you use what the word was in the actual PIE.