Has neoliberalism ruined your country?

Has neoliberalism ruined your country?
>Mexico
>Absolutely

Attached: 987654.jpg (1300x1024, 300.71K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_Memorial_Prize_laureates_in_Economics
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

i miss Peña

Yes.

Yes

US-backed neoliberalism has fucked up all of Latin America, lol.

unironically? yes.

Yes.

Yes Reagan is America's greatest disaster

Yes.

R.I.P. to my bois Allende, Evo, Perón, Martí, Zapata, etc.

Attached: f8issd9797w21.jpg (750x742, 82.52K)

>neoliberalism
Not a thing. Just a boogeyman invented by the left.

>neolibtard

If it isn't a thing then why do have people unironically going around calling themselves neoliberals?

What's the deal with the new guy?

He makes rightoids seethe

>selling the presidential plane with a fucking giveaway
>"go to give hugs!" IN A FUCKING PANDEMIC
>he has "special armbands to avoid corona"
>he fucks horses

Shut up retard

Not really. It's made our situation somewhat more volatile though.

Milton Friedman talked about it (picture) and he used to call himself a neo-liberal.

Attached: screenshot.jpg (1043x634, 169.8K)

Why does the right praise him? I was really surprised when I discovered Reagan and Thatcher were responsible for many anti-gun laws in their countries. I don't know why the right like these two.

I'm currently developing a new theory of economicks that is different from both communism/socialisticm and capitalism/liberalism

I suspect I will win the nobel prize in a few years, better watch out guys

yes, for sure

Right wingers are stupid. You should know considering king macaco rules you.

Alt righters are low IQ retards, that's why

I don't know, because I'm not sure what it is. Neoliberalism is like fascism in that they're terms thrown around liberally towards a handful of disparate issues. Any explanation I've been given has been incoherent and contradictory with every other explanation.

In case you didn't know, there is no such thing as a Nobel Price in Economics.

Neoliberalism is a legit policy, but lefties use it as a boogeyman to discredit everyone who isn't communist.

>Any explanation I've been given has been incoherent and contradictory

Can you list some of those apparent contradictions?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_Memorial_Prize_laureates_in_Economics

The complete lack of self awareness

Neoliberalism is basically Milton Friedman's economic tought. It recalls some elements of classical liberalism but is more individualistic. It's basically an enemy of all interventionism.

Basically: Reagan, Thatcher and Pinochet politics. If someone is blaming neoliberalism on anything else it's most likely using it as a boogeyman.

No, it unironically made us thriving.

I wonder why it works in such a different way in different countries.

Attached: screenshot-www.google.pl-2020.04.12-23_16_58.jpg (1253x624, 101.3K)

Implying Mexico didn’t improve from being a feudal narco state to being a neoliberal narco State.

Yes

Did you even read the article? It literally says that it's not a Nobel Price.

Taxes used to be like 70% until Reagan who reduced them to 20-30%. It works the same everywhere but the efficiency initiatives make life less cozy for some and introduce highly rational mechanisms of government that destroy the left critique of society so they are sad.

>boogeyman
Lmao the right blames neoliberalism for gay marriage and declining church attendance. Leftist correctly skewer it as an economic framework from what I've seen.

>Taxes used to be like 70% until Reagan

Which coincided with the greatest and most sustained economical growth and livingsstandards in human history.

>Muh GDP
Why are boomers like this?

Yes sorry, i should have used "populists" instead.

Yes. But also the Cold War and massive expenditures and all sorts of investments in arts and society and engineering and military. Well a lot of people said ok we are winning this thing let’s push to the end and get a little relief so we actually enjoy our victory. That meant reducing taxes so people took home more income and also enjoyed a nice stock market bull market.

name one (1) better way to measure economic activity (GDP) and wealth of an average citizen (GDP per capita)

PPP

Median income

Attached: miss-the-point.png (400x400, 3.92K)

Maybe you should stop being retarded first. Sanders was attacked as a populist by neoliberalis.

>Yes. But also the Cold War and massive expenditures and all sorts of investments in arts and society and engineering

And those investments had to be stopped, because? Billionaires needed more money for the glass dildos?

that was PPP

Eh, America had very nice growth streaks on the previous decades leading to the Great Depression. Sadly they're obviously not as documented.

Not just billionaires but a lot of deca millionaires and millionaires and hundred thousandnaires. Yes they felt that it was nicer to live grand and enjoy lots of consumption compared to living like soviet tenement people. So a doctor in the US became super rich but a doctor in the Soviet Union was like maybe a hovel for vacation as the highest attainment of status

I like Sanders, but some propositions he has, like deleting the student debt totally IS populism.

What is idiom again? You’re an outlier?

>America had very nice growth streaks on the previous decades leading to the Great Depression.
>Growth was decent until a jeopardizing bubble burst.

Nice self-own lmao. It's called the gilded age and not the golden age for a reason.

Mexico's narco problem is pretty recent