American left: smart leaders, retarded followers

cnbc.com/2019/09/26/majority-of-the-worlds-richest-people-are-self-made-says-new-report.html

More money in their pocket, duh

>american right
>smart followers
youtube.com/watch?v=BU_XQKVJ9tI

Attached: (You).jpg (364x364, 22.36K)

Nailed it

Attached: th7.gif (480x240, 580.1K)

so THIS is what best healthcare on the planet looks like.

Attached: thomas.jpg (600x489, 41.64K)

They're "right wing" purely because right wing politics work in their interest of keeping the most amount of money in their pockets and it allows them to use that money to lobby the government (something right wingers are perfectly okay with).

Adhering to right wing politics didn't make them wealthy. Being wealthy made them adhere to right wing politics.

Attached: 1586357808558.png (667x460, 402.8K)

>gamblers who want to keep their winnings
Meanwhile, scientists, doctors etc. are overwhelmingly left wing

>Adhering to right wing politics didn't make them wealthy.
It did though. Leftism is a fundamentally defeatist philosophy since it makes you believe you will never EVER scale the socioeconomic ladder and the only solution is to make everybody else as miserable as you. It's resentment of the rich masquerading as compassion for the poor.

>Thomas Shillwell
There you go, you got my (You).

>Le u jelly meme analysis
And then rightoids will pretend they're smart

>Leftism is a fundamentally defeatist philosophy since it makes you believe you will never EVER scale the socioeconomic ladder and the only solution is to make everybody else as miserable as you
>It's resentment of the rich masquerading as compassion for the poor.
If it didn't sound like a pseudo scientific cope I would believe.

>It did though.
Prove it.

They're really actually not necessarily right wing though.
Look at silicon valley billionaires, and you'll find that a surprising amount of them are very much left wing.

But why is that?
Maybe it's some form of rich people guilt, alleviated through supporting meaningless new left policies that don't threaten their wealth in any way?
Or maybe, once you've already made it to the top, right wing policies aren't really that beneficial anymore? Maybe it's some form of concession to the plebs to keep them satisfied or at least distracted?
There might not be a simple answer.

Which left wing leaders are smart currently? Everyone's gone off the deep end

They're only left wing to appear as cool and progressive, when it's about to protect their interests they're all right wing don't worry

Well most people WON'T scale that socioeconomic ladder.

That's normal. The market only has so much room for successful start-ups or w/e you're into.

You'll find that a lot of those Silicon Valley billionaires are pro-Democrat, not pro-left wing. Their obnoxious virtue-signalling stopped pretty quickly last year when Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders were leading in the polls. One of the few things the far left is correct about is the close relationship between old guard Democrats and corporate America.

>American left: smart leaders, retarded followers
>American right: retarded leaders, retarded followers

ftfy

Attached: 1564223568323.jpg (916x910, 66.23K)

If it's only that, why are obviously inefficient policies like diversity hiring so common in these companies?

>capitalist
>money earned

>the money you've """earned"""
Exploiting workers and lobbying for deregulation is worse than stealing.

I never understood why it's greed to spend billions of dollars lobbying politicians to demolish labor negotiations so that I remain artificially successful and without any competition

Diversity hiring doesn't threaten their wealth and status

Because diversity hire increases their bottom line.

literal uncle tom

It's not really inefficient and the image win makes up for it anyways

True.
But it still costs something, and it's a left wing policy.
So either they genuinely believe it's the right thing to do, OR they benefit from this in a more indirect way.

Diversity hiring is yet another facade. Despite making a lot of noise about it for a decade, most tech companies are still overwhelmingly white and Asian.