Why does the European Council refuse to allow Morocco and Turkey to join the EU?

Why does the European Council refuse to allow Morocco and Turkey to join the EU?

Attached: Morocco_Turkey_Locator.png (1160x1056, 63.57K)

Other urls found in this thread:

ecfr.eu/article/commentary_finally_some_good_news_albania_and_north_macedonia_on_the_road_t
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Because they're not European.

This. And why would they invite a country to the EU if they are economically unstable?

Then why was Cyprus able to join the EU?

Morocco and Turkey are better than Albania and North Macedonia, but the EU has invited Albania and North Macedonia.

>the EU has invited Albania and North Macedonia.
No.

Copenhagen criteria
They have an association agreement though

ecfr.eu/article/commentary_finally_some_good_news_albania_and_north_macedonia_on_the_road_t

Because Greece is European

My dream

Attached: EU.jpg (1080x747, 220.26K)

Fuck off racist

Fuck off David

They will not join the EU, too many countries are against it. They'll probably sign a treaty but will never enter the Schengen agreement nor the Eurozone.

>North Africa yes
>Russia, Norway, Iceland no

>Then why was Cyprus able to join the EU?
Because its european, pay attention my friend.

Your dream is shit and you're a retard

Russia, Norway and Iceland do not want to join the EU.

Geographically Cyprus is Asia.

My dream too. Except Russia should be in EU and switzerland should be destroyed.

because they're muslim

They started the accession process, so they may join eventually
But they have so many reforms to do that if they'll ever join they'll be unrecognisable and actually decent countries

>Russia should be in EU
Cringe. Russia must return the Crimean peninsula to Ukraine.

>the accession process

Yeah, Turkey did too

Geographically all of europe is in Asia.

it will take several years at least, they dont fulfill the copenhaguen criterias, serbia strarted the process 10 yrs ago and they are still not ready so the fact that the accession file is being reviewed doesnt mean shit

Impossible. It's actually inhabited by Russians and I don't think anyone would start a war with them for Crimea.

>all those leeches in the eu
retard, plus while seeing your flag its none of your matter davido kun

Yeah but they don't have border disputes with a member state and seem willing to actually reform
It's a step forward, but yes it will take 10-20 years probably

20 years yeah.
but seriously who let this retards in? they will just be bigger burdens on the rest and wont bring shit

Russia being in the EU would probably solve a lot of problems, considering their economy is less than half the size of Germany so they'd be easily controllable.

>Russia must return the Crimean peninsula to Ukraine.
Not really. Crimea should have never become part of Ukraine to begin with.
Russia should fuck off from the Donbass and the rest of eastern Ukraine. But Crimea is legit theirs.

And they are undemocratic, undeveloped fucking shitholes. You can go "yeah maybe in 10-20 years we'll see lol" but the real answer right now is "no".

>but the real answer right now is "no"
Yeah well of course. *Maybe* in 10-20 years. For now they are just officially candidates, which is better for them than a few years ago
The whole process is pretty long

Attached: 1559120499595.jpg (1448x2048, 342.31K)

It has a pretty big population. I think they would get more MEPs than even Germany

>I think they would get more MEPs than even Germany
They would get the same amount because there is a cap for MEPs.

Who really decided unanimously on letting Bulgaria of all places join? I mean really? The whole enlargement has been a joke. It shouldn’t have stretched further eastwards than Italia

economic union is good.
but will EU really exist for decades?
will Russia really make good for Europe?

Turkeys population is too big, you dont want to have so many european delegates to go to retarded backwards people

Fuck off you dumb Polish larper. Use your real flag. Nobody’s fooled by your stupid imitation of a Nip.

Of all the east-expansion countries, Bulgaria is by far one of the least problematic candidates.
They don't really make any trouble, don't hover up a lot of convergence funding and just play along.

>Morocco and Turkey are better than Albania and North Macedonia
Actually no.

Romania and Bulgaria are alright, they made a lot of reforms before joining and in general are good members. They are just poor
Hungary and Poland are more troublesome members by far

nah,only one question.
I worry about that.
why so angry?

racism

Boom, ahahaha

True, turkish racism is a big part of the problem.

in economic,maybe
morroco s GDP is 30th or 50th

Why care?
Is it really important to which of two East Slavic shitholes this shitty peninsula belongs?

I’ve noticed Hungarians are probably the most toxic posters on Yas Forums. Shame about their dictator desu, has a lot in common with Erdogan.

May i remind you they sent all their fucking gypsies in western europe? Enlargement was a huge mistake.

It's not like there were no immigrants before. Most of our Albanian immigrants came here in the early 90s

Attached: 1584548655296.png (1280x850, 2.3M)

Says a person whose country genocided millions of Greeks, Assyrians, Kurds and Armenians, also illegally occupies land stolen from them.

>Enlargement was a huge mistake.
I agree, but Bulgaria is a really bad example for why.
Yes, optimally no country should have gotten full membership until they can be a net payer into the EU budget as most fundamental economic rule. There should have been a lot more transitional stages.

>May i remind you they sent all their fucking gypsies in western europe?
We got plenty of them too, and its not really like they didn't come beforehand anyway.

RIP. Should import a bunch of Argies to balance it out.

Also, Arabs were so disgusted at Turks that they literally held England to conquer Palestine and kick the Ottoman ass, lol.

There is a cap at 96 (our MEP number) but they would be quite influential in those votes where you need a certain percentage of the total EU population to pass or veto a decision.

Attached: 1585382207748.jpg (798x944, 220.99K)

t. Siberian larper

t. Ahmed abu Al Nasrallah

EU is a cancer and USA and Russia should put their forces together and destroy it before it evolves into a thousand jahriges reich with global influence

Attached: 1586425771890.jpg (1295x845, 381.13K)

Its legit not theirs'. The region could go through the normal process of secession via real referendum.

Russia promised to DEFEND Ukraine's territorial integrity when they leaned on them along with the US to defang them from having warheads, I don't care what Moscow wants after that.

>Hungary and Poland are more troublesome members by far

Troublesome in the sense that there is no actual trouble but we don't do what you say unconditionally beyond of what was agreed upon. I bet that if Poland invited millions of randoms to their country and then demanded you to take them you'd shit yourself with outrage.

As for the systemic problem its literally hot air you retroactively trumped up with the kraut sponsored 5th column in Poland and Hungary.

>Its legit not theirs'.
Crimea was never ukrainian. The peopel there were always russian first and you'd have to be delusional to think they didn't prefer being annexed by Russia.
Thats the simple reality of it and this way the whole shitshow happened without a single shot having to be fired. If there had been a formal referendum, it would have been a lot messier with US intelligence trying to stoke up another color revolution to prevent it.

I'm all for sanctioning russia for the donbass invasion, but Crimea should be left where it is now.

>Russia promised to DEFEND Ukraine's territorial integrity when they leaned on them along with the US to defang them from having warheads
I'm glad they said whatever it took to talk them into giving up their nuclear weapons because I'd be way more scared of Ukraine having nukes than I would ever be of Russia going around annexing territory. Was it a dick move? Sure, but it was just a consequence of a long string of broken promises that were made after the Cold War.

>Says a person whose country genocided millions of Greeks, Assyrians, Kurds and Armenians, also illegally occupies land stolen from them.

Attached: 1583244946895.png (1052x754, 851.54K)

>Troublesome in the sense that there is no actual trouble but we don't do what you say unconditionally beyond of what was agreed upon.

You paid internet warrior really need to get new lines by now. No one really gives a fuck aboutr that. Slovakia, for example, also refused that and no one considers them a problem because the immigration deal thing is just an excuse for your retarded deflecting.
The fact that you are turning into a blatant one-party dictatorship is way more concerning.

Ta gueule pédé

Neither are Eastern "Europeans".

Yet, Poland and Hungary are far more developed and integrated with West European economy despite the politics. Meanwhile Romania is staunchly loyal to the EU but we're still in 2007 just with more foreign mall and banks.