How is he regarded in your cunt?

Hitler is demonized because of the genocide

Why would that make you hypocritical

royalists cucks are the highest cancer who appeared, they are ignorant about the important role of liberals during the 19th century, they resume the revolution only to the first one and ignore that France started her true supremacy during that century.

up there with Caesar as one of the greatest military leaders. He is regarded as so and he completely centralised our country and government, so he's respected

A robber.
Don't (You) me.

Another great Italian in an already long list of extraordinary Italians

Not only, in France he is particularly demonized because he BTFO us forever and occupied us.
He was no worse than Hitler, he was a conqueror who invaded lands to brings war.

Most people know him as just a short historical figure

Beating his autist empire made us the dominant power at the time so theres that, please ty of fiction about the napoleonic wars here

Napoleon and Hitler were nearly total opposites. Good meme though

stop posting anytime

>Invaded other countries to bring them under his control
>Implemented new laws where he went
>Charismatic
>Big groups of countries came together to defeat them
>Got btfo

Pretty similar

Yes, Hitler was TOTALLY DIFFERENT because the jew tell you that, thank you mister american, the same Iraq was part of the force of darkness because Saddam started to sell oil in euros and not in dollars anymore.

Attached: 1548098478498Asuka.png (1026x770, 468.84K)

Vive la France ! Montjoie !

hero

God

Napoleon is the first antichrist and Hitler the second.

Hero
Ok nazicuck

True, but most Americans who know anything at all about Nappy will take the A*glo view that he was literally Hitler.

As a short retard

great

Napoleon gave right to jews though and nappy tried to unify all of europe, fuck you!

literally hitler

A cunt, but one you wouldn't mind marrying your sister

War criminal, French Hitler

*Unify europe under his rule

US genocided native americans. And we actually succeeded where hitler failed.

genocide dont mean shit

his conquests forced the portuguese royal family to flee and set up court here, so he basically founded the country, and in doing so did more for us than any other portuguese.

You've made an incredibly erroneous conclusion based on what you've said. You've taken some shortcuts in order to get to your false conclusion...

There legacies are total opposites.
Hitler is disregarded as a low-grade politician, a liar, faked his entire image, who seized power through a lucky break, was a tyrant for a few years, bullied his weaker neighbors, and then failed miserably when he overshot himself and became too confident.
Napoleon is rightfully remembered as a rebirth of the ideal Roman despot who is now a champion for modern liberties and ideas, despite his aggressiveness in pursuing it

Remembered in that way by autists, in real life noone likes being invaded and noone likes war. I love his modern ideas of being free under his yoke and legal reform as long as you're part of his empire

not nazi, just being objective.
of course he his probably demonized in Poland because you are huge LOSERS.

as the father of the german unification

I was blown away when I saw that this portrait is in the National Gallery here in DC. I was like, "whoa! that's here? this is THE portrait of Napoleon?"

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_national_legal_systems
>ctrl+f: napoleon.
36 matches
>crtl+f: Hitler
0 matches

Really makes me think

He was admired even by his enemies:
>It was a private commission from the Scottish nobleman and admirer of Napoleon, Alexander Hamilton, 10th Duke of Hamilton in 1811 and completed in 1812. Originally shown at Hamilton Palace, it was sold to Archibald Primrose, 5th Earl of Rosebery in 1882, from whom it was bought by the Samuel H. Kress Foundation in 1954, which deposited it in Washington D.C.'s National Gallery of Art, where it now hangs.[

unify all of europe under french supremacy, are you naive? just think about when your country occupied some land on the past. Nappy was not here for playing, the ones who call him a savior are the liberals (les libéraux, using 19th century definition) who wanted to create republic states with democracies against monarchist states with feudalism. (called the "conservatives"). however Napoléon turned to be an imperialist for french interests. it's good for us but it sucks for others.

so comparing him to Hitler is right, it's of course stupid to says they have the same ideology BUT they are the same kind of character who did a lot of shit during their conquest, it's war after all you know.

>discussion about napoleon
>uk flag appears
>constant stream of bullshit flowing

Like clockwork

Ok Pierre. Now tell how are you feel with living in first country in the history which is being conquered by his own former subordinates even without one shot

Literally everything I wrote is true seething frog, what is wrong

Neutral. Lithuanians hoped we'd get a similar treatment to Poles, but he just didn't care much while passing through here and didn't do much else besides the usual requisitions.
There is some admiration to him as a celebrity, of course. If you're ever in Vilnius and visit the St. Anne church, any Lithuanian will make sure to tell you "Napoleon saw it and said he wished he could take it in his palm and move it to Paris!" And schooltextbooks mention that serfdom was abolished in the part of the country that was part of the Duchy of Warsaw. Other than that, no one cares or knows about his politics.

Attached: 3df832c671cd0c6d3e38aef934359263.jpg (695x553, 89.38K)

they don't come in your country because you are too poor. simple as that.

Europeons be like Napoleon is evil he came in our countries instituted democracy and civil rights and freed us from slavery, fuck liberalism long live the chains.

crushed the mediterranean jew (venice) so he is good guy.

We don't cares how they are remembered, are you stupid? how some historic characters are remembered depend of the current political regimes who rules.

I was talking about his actions, and it's a fact that Napoléon was a conqueror who could totally be compared to Hitler. you perfectly know he has good reputation because he became a meme on your pop culture, that's just it.

You're implying that France attacked its neighbours when it's completely the opposite you absolute fucking retard

Like a decent enemy

>Napoleon and Hitler have the same kind of character
Hitler was a self-indulging brainlet who believed in pseudo-historical analysis, and banned non-German artist and anyone different.

Napoleon meanwhile was reserved and respectful. Napoleon respected science and academic. He praised non-French artists and invited them to Paris. That's why the German legend Goethe looked back fondly and said meeting Napoleon was the epoch of his life

You are not objective, you obviously take part for a side. I can use the exact same arguments to defend Hitler or every kind of conqueror who come as "liberator".

Yes to be fair he literally started out defending france from being invaded by all the monarchs and powers that be who wanted to reinstate ol Louis boy. I feel bad that he did end up taking it too far but he was literally thrown in that position.

There's a lot of regimes in the last 200 years who all praised Napoleon

There are no regimes today who praise Hitler

Napoleon has a good reputation because he was brilliant at everything he did and it was hard to argue he wasn't right about everything

But retard, we don't cares how they were, i'm talking about the military actions here. and idealizing so much 19th century leaders is a proof that you believe all the fucked up things he did during wars doesn't matters because it's older than 20th century. learn to be more objective. Napoléon was a good thing for french interests (and liberals who wanted revolutions, they were all masonic dudes) but sucked for the lands he conquered.

>instituted democracy
It's hard to romanticise Napoleon even as a liberal. On the one hand, yes, he was far ahead of most other rulers, but on the other - he abandoned the republic, scaled back most of the democratic policies and reinstituted the monarchy itself.
Also, it turned out he wasn't much of a liberator and more of a conqueror with plunder on his mind. War feeds itself and all that.

>These bad things he don't count because other countries also did bad things

He invaded his neighbours and took over their countries end of

Even Hitler praised Napoléon you moron, nobody praise him because he lose the war and that america did everything to make a bad reputation about him. bad reputation for Hitler is the same as bad reputation for Japan Empire.

anyway I was refering to military actions; we don't cares if somebody else was brilliant or charismatic here, it's about blood, corpses and conquest. I can even says fucking George W Bush is also comparable to Hitler and Napoléon because he started the same kind of warmongering actions.

In 1808 Napoleon rolled back a number of reforms (under the so-called décret infâme, or Infamous Decree, of 17 March 1808), declaring all debts with Jews to be annulled, reduced or postponed. The Infamous Decree imposed a ten-year ban on any kind of Jewish money-lending activity. Similarly, Jewish individuals who were in subservient positions—such as a Jewish servant, military officer, or wife—were unable to engage in any kind of money-lending activity without the explicit consent of their superiors. Napoleon's goal in implementing the Infamous Decree of 1808 was to integrate Jewish culture and customs into those of France. By restricting money-lending activity, Jews would be forced to engage in other practices for a living. Likewise, in order to even engage in money-lending activity, the decree required Jews to apply for an annual license, granted only with the recommendation of the Jews' local consistory and with the surety of the Jews' honesty.[1] This caused so much financial loss that the Jewish community nearly collapsed. On a different note, the Infamous Decree also placed heavy restrictions on the Jews' ability to migrate. The decree prevented the Jews from relocating to the regions of Alsace and required that Jews wishing to move to other regions of France own or purchase land to farm. It also required them to refrain from engaging in any kind of money-lending activity. (The law eventually only placed these restrictions on the Jews of the northeast.) Likewise, the French decree required Jewish individuals to serve in the French military,

Like Julius Caesar, he lost confidence in republicanism. But, Napoleon still used his position of power to spread civil rights.

>Napoléon was a good thing for french interests (and liberals who wanted revolutions, they were all masonic dudes) but sucked for the lands he conquered.
>nobody praise him because he lose the war
Are you sure this is the reason nobody praises Hitler? Do you think maybe it might be for a few other things?

Also, Napoleon lost the war, yet is still praised....why not Hitler?

Napoleon was a genius who fucked the Jews and the Jews couldn't defame him without being immoral, Hitler was a barbarian mongolois outplayed by jews whose nation is raped by Jews today.

And plunder the lands he conquered and continue warring. Like I said, hard to be romantic about him as a republican/liberal

>Also, Napoleon lost the war, yet is still praised....why not Hitler?
Because you are controlled by jews, you won the war, made all of western europe your unofficial colonies and you are forcing us to believe in the holocaust and love nigger dicks with your soft power.

anymore questions?

A hero, and one of the most powerful and talented leader who ever lived
He was at least 2 centuries ahead compared to the rest of Europe, oh what could have been.

Attached: Europe_1812_map_en.png (1920x1263, 1.49M)

Just imagine....
United Republican Imperial revived Empire

>why not Hitler
Because of all the genocide, crushing of human rights, warmongering, etc.
Also, Napoleon was in fact very demonized in the 1800s. He was basically used the way we use "Hitler"

Lisbon to Vladvistok Nationalistic Virteous Republic of the EVROPEAN Razza.

Napoleon wasn't a republican, he literally reinstated monarchy in France and appointed his family and friends as kings and queens in the countries he conquered.

Although, I suppose it could be argued it would have led to a faster unification of Europe. On the other hand, it would have been achieved through force, who knows, it would have probably exploded like a pressure cooker eventually.

If he had succeeded, Europe would probably be free of nigs
Us frenchmen literally live in the worst possible timeline

reason why europe should never have continental hegemony

>If he had succeeded, Europe would probably be free of nigs
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

There was plunder involved in some aspects, but plunder theres 150 years of difference separating the two plunderings Hitler/Napoleon

>demonized in the 1800s
It's no coincidence he was demonized during a time of when monarchy still reigned supreme

>jooooooos
Stopped reading there. Just shut the fuck up. No body takes you seriously and never will

Europe would own the planet and the European race would dominate and take over as the leading population of the planet with all of Africa made into European departments, all middle east and Asia and the world conquered for Evropa, where education, merit and virtue are valued and banking is taken away as a posistion of privilige but as an institution of the state.

so they will always be weak and divided. the future belongs to massive unions (USA, USSR, Chinese States).

go brexit go!

Rothschild's funded the war against european triumph, twice has Evropa been killed but we keep reviving like a phoenix.

he wanted slavery back, dumb nigger