1. cunt
2. Thoughts on leftism/socialism/communism?
1. cunt
Other urls found in this thread:
dailykos.com
truthout.org
politico.com
twitter.com
Communism is a failure in the sense that it itself failed. However, it did allow us to discover the ideal economic model: the Chinese state corporatist model.
>colombia.
>it doesn't work.
be libertarian like tanya
Honest question: why do people, in general, defend property rights so ardently when 50% don't own anything.
>communism
>failed
>implying communism has been tried
This shit again.
kek
Communists aren't human
STATE SPONSORED HELICOPTER RIDES
It's inevitable.
>Stalinism/Maoism
>Communism
cringe
They get free helicopter tours
Most of the world isn't brazil. Kill yourself, honestly.
Ugh... what could have been...
More than half a century of brainwashing must have had some effect, especially in ignorant, illiterate, uneducated populations like ours
>when you hate oppression and love freedom so much you jerk off to the most cartoonishly evil authoritarian regimes imaginable
underage Yas Forumstards detected
helicopter goes BRRRRRRRRRRR
>underage communist detected
i have my qualms about capitalism would strongly prefer not to
I was actually thinking about the USA. 1% of the people own 72% of the wealth and the bottom 50% owns 2%. I don't know about Brazil's stats on this.
It's actually incredible. You will see poor people defending billionaires with their hearts with that "they make jobs" rhetoric.
ppsh goes BRRRRRRRRRR
Just one more thing: Even in highly egalitarian societies, like Scandinavians, the ownership of wealth is highly highly concentrated. This isn't about Brazil or the US. It is a global phenomenom.
Forget that capitalists fought Nazis too, Zhang?
i'm a big fan of national socialism
commies who own guns are useful idiots
marx literally advocated for firearm proliferation for the masses
Tempting
>real communism hasn't been tried yet
>i don't know how to read
capitalism and fascism are two sides of the same coin, one cannot exist without the other
unnironically the future, either that or a run by Disney and McDonalds
Yes and what is precisely the problem with that?
socialism and fascism are two sides of the same coin, one cannot exist without the other
unironically read marx
1.flag
2.Stalin did nothing wrong
>says communism doesn't work
>is a libertarian
dailykos.com
truthout.org
politico.com
leftism is retarded, coronavirus has proven that even normies think humans are cancer.
future is fascist. eugenics will eradicate all unwanted minorites. whiteness will win.
Yes.
do i have to spell it out for you smoothbrains? it doesn't matter what marx said and yes I know he was a massive advocate for prolific gun ownership by the proletariat the truth is no matter what socialist/communist world is crated based on marxism it does not in the slightest degree value that gun ownership
at worst it's a neutral force, at best it's a force for good
why
socialism and communism are not the same
that's a rare one
My granddad was a jolly good natured man but he hated communists with a passion
You can be left without believing in socialism.
Economic politics should be right while social politics should be left.
that wasnt REAL libertarianism!
fucking kys tranny
you tell me exactly what socialist institution has ever been implemented that did not fervently suppress gun ownership. it's hardly valued in any society to the degree it ought to be except maybe in the instances of america and pakistan but any leftist nation that has ever existed will go directly for the guns first.
like i said, useful idiots.
Cringe
kys commietard
Marx was a hobo who never worked a single day of his life and thinks the government should decide how much people earn and receive shit for free.
Only retarded people believe his bullshit.
Won't work
Communism assumes that people is not greedy enough to take what they don't need, and they're completely wrong
Capitalism on the other hand, assumes that everyone cares about money and nothing else and is basically evil in their nature, so it works fine because everyone's pretty much like that (includes so called socialist China which is basically more capitalist than most cunts)
this but the complete opposite
It's an inherent flaw of capitalism. I'd say there are three ways of how this will end.
1. Change in the capitalism framework: progressive tax, heavy taxation on inheritances and general continuous redistribution of wealth
2. Repressive regime to maintain capitalism and inequality (e.g. fascism/proto-fascism etc)
3. Socialist regime change.
>thinks the government should decide how much people earn and receive shit for free
factually incorrect
socialism = big goverment, dictatorship of the proletariat
communism = no state, no clases
it so fucking simple, literally just read Marx before you form an opinion on just how "wrong" he was ffs
based and samepilled
Tell me how great Venezuela is doing with their socialism.
BASADO
*coups your government and sends death squads to guillotine you*
Whoops didn't read your post lol socialist
Btw: accordingly with the curren trend, we will eventually reach 1800s' levels of inequality. I don't have to remember you lads how was the 1800 and early 1900 in terms of revolutions, do I?
conservatives are mentally ill, kill yourselves
i'm no fan of socialism and i'm not a communist either, i just want you guys to understand that you don't know jack shit about the thing you disagree with
People are greedy because of capitalism, not because because of their nature
Human nature is survival and happiness, which can only be attained under capitalism by being the most greedy and selfish
Sure... US sanctions and CIA backed coup attempts have nothing to do with it
Socialism assumes every person can survive with the same amount of wealth which is entirely wrong.
Another thread were communists treat Marx as Jesus and das Kapital as Bible
>It's an inherent flaw of capitalism
why?
>Socialism assumes every person can survive with the same amount of wealth
Which author wrote that? I'm not even advocating for socialism btw.
jesus didn't write the bible tho
Where do I begin?
Most population without means to achieve a reasonable living standard while a minority lives lavishly, people don't have acess to capital and can't invest in themselves and consequently improving society, distortion on political power, etc etc.
Socialists are mentally ill people who listen exactly the rhetoric bullshit they want to hear.
>you won't be poor anymore because the government will gift you money and support programs!
>you aren't allowed to be rich! rich people bad because they hoard the money that the poor need!
It's exactly the same rhetoric our pseudo-commie president used to sway poor people and tell them what they wanted to hear.
>muh class equality
>muh social programs
What socialism does is make everyone equally poor.
"From each according to their abilities, to each according to their needs"
How does that mean everyone gets the same amount of wealth ?
In fact, your definition is closer to what capitalism is. Where everyone is required to get a job and pay rent at the rate of the market, no matter their disabilities and their life story
Socialism rots nation from the inside.