Who was the absolute worst leader in your cunts history?

who was the absolute worst leader in your cunts history?

Attached: Woodrow_Wilson-H&E.jpg (2308x2988, 371.64K)

still is unfortunately

all of them

Nehru

FDR

That's not FDR, Lincoln, Truman, Nixon, Reagan, LBJ, or Trump.

Tony FUCKING Blair

Attached: A56B34BB-BD99-4E8B-B924-48EF69E73DA5.jpg (906x1230, 582.94K)

Pinoshit by far

What do American think about Coolidge today?

why is fdr worst

FDR because he dragged the US into an unnecessary war and put a hundred thousand Japanese Americans into concentration camps, robbing each them years of their life

First off not be such an absolutist ruler, reform the empire sooner to a federation, not just after he lost the German war. Also not fight the German war in the first place since at that point it really was clear Germany was going to be stronger and instead focus on the empire instead of the German princes. And last but most importantly not expand further into the fucking Balkans. Literally the worst decision leading to 2 world wars and millions lives lost.

>bound to be absorbed by Germany sooner or later
But you are Germans, what's wrong with joining up?

Austria was a power in its own right in those days, in Germany we would have been just another province.

We've had plenty of bad leaders but this one probably did the most long term damage

Attached: Howard-John.jpg (638x958, 154.91K)

Donald J. (the J stands for jew) Drumpf

Bolsonaro by far
The man can't even speak properly. Must be a subhuman with a crippling low IQ

Meme answer: Drumpf
Non-meme answer: Adams or Buchanan

>FDR BAD

Attached: 4295F216-2163-4589-B67B-E3177E43E3BD.jpg (971x565, 77.58K)

Yes

>wasted resources in the Spanish and Ethiopian conflicts
>brought Italy unprepared into WWII
>did so poorly his own lieutenants turned on him
>ended up being a puppet in the hands of Hitler
>became the head of a rogue puppet State
>tried to blame it on the Monarchy
>spawned a civil war
Honestly pathetic, he even recognised his own husk-like state near the end of his life.

Attached: Benito_Mussolini_colored.jpg (742x1100, 178.95K)

go back

Compared to Buchanan, the one whose actions and inactions essentially facilitated the Civil War, by far the bloodiest war in U.S. history?

I'm not sure why you rate Buchanan as worst when Lincoln was the one who actually made the decision to initiate the war by invading the South

What the hell is so bad about Adams as president, compared to some of our worst?

He had few major low points other than internal politics, and his major high point was keeping our young and ill-equipped nation out of a European war while keeping the European nations from attacking us (for another 12 years which gave us time to build up power, til basically in 1812 we were willing co-provacateurs).

Civil war needed to happen. Lincoln is worse because he is partially responsible for the wrong side winning, as well as strong arming border states from seceding. All of that is trivial, however, compared to the actions of the prog era borderline communists (yes, even Teddy)

I put him there for the Alien and Sedition Acts, but now that I think about it he wasn’t as bad as any of the weak pre-Civil War presidents like Buchanan or Pierce.

He expanded the power of the federal government.

>initiate the war by invading the South
How do you invade what is your own territory? The U.S. Army was met with armed rebellion when it entered what is legally its own fort.

Don't pretend there is any legal interpretation that gave the South some kind of territorial authority when it declared its secession. It's a rebellion, plain and simple.

Her Majesty the Queen of England

you posted him

the one currently in charge

>Muh federal government
There’s a reason why the Articles of Confederation failed to be an effective government framework.

Blocher, on behalf of Swissfags.

Like his policies or not, the fuckwit couldn't even serve through his incumbency like literally every other executive. In other words, he's the first executive in Switzerland to be "fired" by the people in over a century.

He's been called "the Trump before there was Trump"

Hitler

Eat shit Woodrow

Attached: taft.jpg (624x696, 87.58K)

Dragged America into the war by deliberately provoking Japan and Germany with trade sanctions and arming the Allies and then put hundreds of thousands of people in concentration camp for no real reason

Was Willy II good?

Agustin P Justo probably
that's the true beginning of the end for Argentina, when we started to tumble, military regimes became acceptable and the central bank became a thing
there was also an uptick in political fuckery after that, so my second guess would be Ramon Castillo, that tool

It was fine before the Great Depression.
That too.

>Lincoln was the one who actually made the decision to initiate the war by invading the South

Attached: F04EC045-0342-4D95-A021-5F21E8461C10.png (1221x764, 30.2K)

Ofc Moon, the disaster^^

I know nothing about South Korean politics, why do people dislike Moon?

Fuck you, faggot. No seriously fuck you.

Attached: list-santa-anna-2.jpg (921x1200, 219.52K)

Never trust a veracruchango

Have a lot
Hipolito Yrigoyen
Saenz Peña
Alberto Fernandez
Cristina Kirchner
Nelson Kirchner
De la Rua
Military dictatorship 1976
Alfonsin
Mauricio Macri

Moon chase Sun away turn Day into Night heap big darkness bring until Blue Sky God waken for morning.

Would be odd living an in alternate universe where the Texas Revolution was put down and Texas would still be in Mexico. I wonder if the Anglo settlers there would stay pure or if they would become mestizos over time.

Hatoyama “loopy” Yukio

You posted him

Warren Harding

>perhaps the single dumbest person from an IQ standpoint to ever sit in the Oval Office
>appointed his poker buddies to cabinet positions where they proceeded to steal everything that wasn't nailed down
>his own father said of him "If Warren were a girl, he'd be in a lot of trouble because he can never say no to anyone."
>also one of the least written about presidents simply because there's not a lot interesting to say about him

The thing is annexing Texas on behalf of its Anglo (read American) settlers was a big part of America's push to get into the Mexican-American War. That and Florida. And historically, wherever huge numbers of Americans start settling, the U.S. is likely to try to annex and eventually turn into a State. That's what happened with Hawaii and Alaska.

(Conversely, the fact that Anglo Americans did not settle en masse in places like Amer. Samoa and Guam and Puerto Rico is why there has been almost zero push to make them states (no, P.R. referenda that can barely reach a plurality don't count). )

What I'm saying is when you've got a lot of American settlers, I think the "'Merica, Fuck Yeah!" attitude is just going to be too overwhelming to ever go away, even after decades. In Hawaii it just built up and built up until they essentially forced their Queen to sign over the islands to the U.S..

>fancy himself a military genius and the Napoleon of the Americas
>get captured along with his entire army by ragtag Texas force
>later catastrophically defeated by burgers on the battlefield
>later on he retake power and sell off even more clay to burgers because he claim he need money to rebuild the army
>most of this money gets squandered or lines his pockets
>he gets couped for the final time
>ends up dying blind and in poverty exiled in NYC

I guess then the interesting alt history would be the U.S. government saying "no" to annexation of Florida and Texas (like how they resisted for quite a while with Hawaii) until one or both territories pulls either a bloodless or bloody coup a la Hawaii to be independent or join USA.