Which is more based?

Which is more based?

Which is more cringe?

Attached: NYC-Vs-LA-top-image-0c295e.jpg (1600x800, 1.34M)

New York is the obvious awnser.

>east coast amerimutt fat goyblins vs west coest amerimutt fat goyblins
Thats a tough one

In one city I can walk into any store and yell "GIMMIE A BACON EGG AND CHEESE" and get it. The other is full of commies. You figure it out OP

Los Angeles is a mistake of history.

San Francisco should have been the Manhattan of the west.

NYC by a landslide

They're very different cities

NYC is a concrete jungle. LA is not a concrete jungle.

You can't drive in NYC. You can drive in LA (but barely because the traffic there is insane)

NYC people are really stuck up and unpleasant. LA got a mix of really nice people, valley girls that are extremely shallow and just straight up crackheads that want to murder you.

LA has a beach, NYC does not really.


They're both comfy cities desu. I think I prefer LA though.

Attached: 20180920_182710.jpg (4032x1960, 2.16M)

>tf
>tp
both cities are infested with Jews

>amerimutt larpers
>real jews
Mutts are so desperate to have a cultural idenyity they will even larp as jews

New York is an accommodating city. The people are better there
Like any place without seasons LA always seemed soulless. Only been once though

San Francisco is the correct answer.

LA a shit.

The Jews in Brooklyn are so real they still perform oral as part of their circumcision ceremony pal

El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora la Reina de los Ángeles of course

They're both shit

NYC is a real world city that has soul and character. LA just seems like an abomination.

NYC is probably my favorite city, at risk of sounding like a dork. It has character and history even with all the touristy parts.

LA felt like I was in some sort of fake city that wasn't meant to exist, like a movie set that had been left to mutate, built in like a year with a bunch of homeless people pissing anywhere they could

They are both shit compared to Melbourne

Attached: melb.jpg (2000x1130, 623.39K)

>2 pics from warsaw
the fuck are you on about?

LA is fucking shit and worse than NYC in every way. NYC has more blacks, but that's tolerable compared to the open air oven LA is nine months out of the year.

t. LA resident

H*redim make up close to a majority of New York Jews. Probably a majority at this point actually.

LA is nice as a tourist and they have better climate for my taste, but NYC is the most popular tourist destination for a reason and the better city overall. LA is only fammous because of Hollywood, which isn't a real city parameter. I like both though.

New York. At least there i can do things like

1) walk to the store instead of driving
2) walk or take the bus/train to work instead of being stuck on a 40 lane highway for 2 hours every day
3) not breathe smog
4) see interesting architecture
5) eat something other than mexican or chinese food
6) know that my house won't be destroyed by an earthquake
7) eat good pizza

NYC is better, but now that I'm older and after being born and raised in NYC, I'd rather live in LA

Attached: Battery Park City, Manhattan.jpg (3629x2722, 3.17M)

NYC is peak American character, LA is an embarrassment of the nation

Well then move out of the Valley and into the Westside if you want to bitch about the heat.

vs.

Attached: Laguna Beach, Orange County, California (2014) 02.jpg (4000x2667, 1.73M)

Can you do this in Manhattan?

Attached: BeFunky Collage.jpg (2000x2000, 890.22K)

Home alone 2 would have been shit in LA.

Fuck Los Angeles. Only gets beaten out by San Francisco in awfulness.

LA has so many Brits with regular jobs. The last Fedex driver I interacted with was from England. Loaded guys from the UK love LA.

New York, because of superior infrastructure.

Unironically looks like a landfill

chiraq please

And architecture. New York is the city to get skyscrapers right. The Art Deco helps.

only euros and brits jerk off to los angeles. even chicago shits on the spic shithole called LA

NYC because of Frankie Gennaro Gambardelli and his 35 nephews that work as waiters in Little Italy.

>New York
dont need a car
>Los Angeles
literally built for cars
im taking NYC

Attached: 4338c39c8dd46a815fe9ef6dcb08689f.jpg (3000x2038, 1.05M)

LA has shitty skyline due to a law requiring all tall building to accommodate helicopters during emergencies.

You cannot get this in NYC.

Attached: background.jpg (2009x1272, 220.49K)

uh neither can you or anyone except for the 0.001%. is this what angelinos do, jerk off their billionaire overlords as if their lives are in any way representative of los angeles writ large

Nah, clue's in the name, new YORK.

LA/NYC have all the hot women. Go to San Diego and you will find nothing but ugly short girls. That factor alone attracts successful men to these cities.

Is NYC all spic like LA?

NYC. SF would have been amazing but it's been ruined by bad policies. Pretty sad imo
Holy based

LA is half as expensive compared to Manhattan. When I meet guys from NYC who move to LA they are reborn as their money gets them a much more.

puerto rican spics, but they're pushed out all the way into the bronx. mexican spics cluster right in the middle of downtown la

Aren't Puerto Rican's United Statians?

another reason why NYC > LA. at least the ethnics are legal and didn't borderhop it over like roaches

Those of you saying SF must love cock as their women are Glasgow Manchester level ugly.

LA based Aussie Natalie Roser.

Attached: 75322215_189991435379289_2581899098999354017_n[1].jpg (1080x1349, 196.78K)

*a challenger appears*

Attached: chicago-skyline-at-sunset-tom-mcdonald.jpg (900x675, 138K)

What is this place? I've been there in GTA V.

Griffith Park Observatory.

Do pretty Rube girls move to Chicago?

Chicago needs a Giuliani to come along and throw all the niggers in prison. Maybe then it can become a respectable global city.

Well it is the best American city. NYC is the world capital, LA is its own think, and Miami is the capital of Latin America.

Laguna Beach is based but isn't LA.

t. San Diego

It is more livable than NYC but just feels like a smaller more generic version with friendlier people.

How do you manage to be this wrong?

>Based
No one
>More cringe
Los gaygeles

New york is based. LA is a hellhole full of goblinos and pollution.

LA is a concrete jungle, just most of it is in the roads rather than buildings

Really? You'd think San Diego would be filled to the brim with beach babes and Latina hotties.

I live in the south, it's not the same man.

NY has beaches. It just isn’t beach weather all year like in Cali.

did not see any really attractive girls when i visited LA, maybe they just arent near the sants monica area

NYC is by far more based. LA is full of actualy faggots, homeless people, and jewllywood elites. also NYC is mostly walkable while LA is not. havent visited NYC but LA is the shittiest place ive ever been