Countries whose history matters at least a little bit

Countries whose history matters at least a little bit.

Attached: Countries.png (1357x628, 43.77K)

>no Lebanon who Water
>no Syria who invented soap

>Israel not red

Sweden has been more influential in history than mongolia and netherlands

>netherlands
Even though I share a bitter rivalness with the dutchies, you're wrong. Dutch were one of the biggest traders throughout history, so stfu snownigger

Did Lebanon invent water? Never saw that in the history books

Add Poland, Hungary, Sweden and Saudi Arabia

>Saudi Arabia
Doesn’t really count. Only one major event in the 600s, later on Arabia becomes as historical and eventful as Serbia. Seriously, do you ever read about anything major happening in Arabia from the 700s till the 1800s?

>Serbia
******************Siberia

pisslam which is the second largest religion originated from there. Also caliphates were very important

>Transoxiana
>Not red

isn't north macedonia the remnants of the makedon empire of alexander the great? They should be red too imo

>Also caliphates were very important
Literally not a single caliphate/sultanate/emirate after the four imams(omar, othman, abu bakr and ali) was centered in Arabia: all of them were either in Mesopotamia, Levant, Persia, Egypt, NA, etc. Arabia became a peripheral region after the first fitna.

What did Japan do besides cut themselves up until the west BTFO them?

fictional countries have no history.

You can't be fucking serious.

Attached: c024b831.png (416x356, 34.53K)

Nordic countries, Israel, the Koreas and Saudi Arabia should be red. Might've missed some

It was Allah who sent prophet Mohammed and gave them the book, so it isn't like their personal achievement.

American history doesn't matter. Your influence is purely based on your private companies

Not sure about Netherlands, but you're retarded if you think it was more so than Mongolia.

Attached: chuckles.gif (852x676, 461.78K)

No. Sweden only had a few years of regional relevancy, before being throw into irrelevancy forever.

Netherlands was one of the big boys. Even Japan knew they existed even before opening their country to foreigners

>Koreas
>Red
They had almost no influence further than northeast China until the late 1940s

>being a superpower for 75 years is irrelevant

knew it was gonna be an amerishart flag
boys you sure are predictable

We cause an immense level of seething on a planet-wide scale 24/7. Checkmate.

Sweden's only act worthy of note was the german genocide during the religious wars and it's not worth much because you didn't finish the job.

you can't be a superpower if you lose wars to vietnam.

Attached: a38.jpg (1024x962, 66.77K)

Holy cope

We beat you twice

once, and that was mostly due to spain/france. 1812 was a win for us. also you still lost to nam lol

Lebanon who Water, absolutely based

It's relevant, but it's not important.

Ok Lindy.

why have you removed poland and sweden since the last time I saw this thread? the removal of belgium is at least understandable

they were a major regional power for centuries

> Had to get sugar daddies France and Spain to get independence
> the bongs were busy battling against the terror of Europe, Napoleon, and yet you couldn't take Canada
How are these wins, exactly?

Pretty good map. With only 2 faults. Crete missing as well as the Holy Land.

>why have you removed poland and sweden

Because their impact on world history has been marginal.

Would argue Mexico, Brazil, Ethiopia, and Mali would matter a bit.

Justify these countries.

i love japan but it doesn't matter
israel/palestine needs to be red, maybe saudi arabia too
other than that i pretty much mostly agree

who gives a flying fuck about Austria?
based retard

If we didn't win, why aren't we still a British colony?

The USSR lost to Afghanistan and they were definitely a superpower.

cope

they didn't lose to nam tho.

>non argument from a Yas Forumsirgin

>who gives a flying fuck about Austria?
Have you ever heard of Habsburgs?

the only countries that mattered : egypt inda israel greece china italy france germany

And we didn't lose to Afghanistan.

the east india company was at war with india during the american war of independence too but I'm not sure that it counts as the uk being at war with india

poland kept the ottoman empire out of europe
if it's a case of being important to world history more of the MENA and asian countries should be red and probably belgium for the belgian congo

>1812 was a win for us
cope, amis beat you in war twice and made you dissolve your empire

North Vietnam was supported by China, Russia and North Korea. If you can make excuses so can I.

>america
>history
lmao

Mali (really just the region during the empire days) as crucial to the go between from Europe to Sub-Saharan Africa. Also the salt trade.
Mexico as the first dominant colony of the "New World." And the first real use a of racial class systems which is still used today to describe our own identities.
Brazil culturally has influenced thousands of musicians, plus the creation of the first if not one of the first empires in the "New World."
Ethiopia being the last real bastion of non colonized Africa, home of the some of oldest sects of monotheistic religion, and has kept it's history decently documented since it was just a small part of the kingdom of Kush.

>japan

Oy vey where is Israel

Everyone always says this but the Vietnam war didn't end in the defeat of our military. There were only 58,000 US dead vs 850,000 NV/VC. The reason for the defeat was mostly political since the war was very unpopular among the US population due to its foreign and purely ideological nature. Had public opinion wanted the war to continue we could still be there today pointlessly slaughtering third worlders in senseless conflict.

Hey we wuz aztecs n shieett :(

>america
>japan
>uk
Does anglos really?

Peru and South Mexico should be partly shaded at least

You're not one to talk

Yeah like taking all your land north of the Rio Grande. Seethe

>tf
>tp
Why do spics have no sense of self-awareness?

>poland kept the ottoman empire out of europe
No they didn't.

>Mali (really just the region during the empire days) as crucial to the go between from Europe to Sub-Saharan Africa. Also the salt trade.

Everyone traded with each other. Impact on world history: marginal.

>Mexico as the first dominant colony of the "New World." And the first real use a of racial class systems which is still used today to describe our own identities.

Ok this has some merit but I'd argue that this is more Spanish history than what could be considered Mexican history.

>Brazil culturally has influenced thousands of musicians, plus the creation of the first if not one of the first empires in the "New World."

Marginal impact on world history.

>Ethiopia being the last real bastion of non colonized Africa, home of the some of oldest sects of monotheistic religion, and has kept it's history decently documented since it was just a small part of the kingdom of Kush.

Marginal impact on world history.

>a bit

not him but the war started because we stopped their trade with the french and they were eternally assblasted that we were impressing american seamen into the navy, the war ended with because the navy stopped impressing seamen after boney was defeated
for america it was a second war of independence, for the uk it's a war where no land concessions were made by either side and we mogged their navy

china lost their war in vietnam too though

then what do you call the european concessions of land the ottoman empire made following the great turkish war? if poland has to go I don't get why austria stays

Also Ireland saving Western Thought through surviving the black plague unscathed.

What the mongols did was totally out of Mongolia who not even existed as a country, so it make no sense to include Mongolia. Their setting was China, Russia and Iran.